What makes Bamber innocent?

[lookout]

because they had no doubt jb was the killer

I think it's about time you realised that DB's statement had been edited to such an extent that it was deemed necessary to interview personnel from the DPP's office. Now figure out why.

The same statements were undated and unsigned.

[lookout]

Also while you're at it,ask yourself why AP had lied about the whereabouts of his rifle and giving two or three locations on its whereabouts at the time of the tragedy.
BTW his rifle and silencer were at WHF during the tragedy----all AP took home was the bolt ! Why lie ??

[Adam]

Why do you think it was a risk Steve. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

It was impossible for the relatives to expertly put Sheila's blood into the silencer. Thread created.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained ?  They would certainly be seriously prosecuted as criminals for trying to frame an innocent man of killing his family.

Then again, Julie was doing to same because Bamber apparently jilted her and the 'treacherous' Stan Jones was ahead of everyone, secretly taking a silencer out of WHF on the 7th August for no apparent reason.

[mike tesko]

It is conceded that one of the two silencers found at the scene by relatives was handed over to 'Stan' Jones by Peter Eaton, and via 'Bob' Miller, it found its way into the possession of 'Ron' Cook, who in turn took the said silencer to the lab' for the attention of Glynis Howard on the 13th August 1985. At this time, according to 'Ron' Cook, this particular silencer did not have a signed exhibit label attached to it, so Cook himself attached a brown CJA exhibit label to it, marking it, ' SJ/1'. He states that he did not know that 'Stan' Jones had a middle Christian name, hence why he marked the label, 'SJ/1'...

[buddy]

It was impossible for the relatives to expertly put Sheila's blood into the silencer. Thread created.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained ?  They would certainly be seriously prosecuted as criminals for trying to frame an innocent man of killing his family.

Then again, Julie was doing to same because Bamber apparently jilted her and the 'treacherous' Stan Jones was ahead of everyone, secretly taking a silencer out of WHF on the 7th August for no apparent reason.

What do you mean expertly? an idiot could have done that.
Anyway the silencer was a red herring.

[mike tesko]

It is conceded that one of the two silencers found at the scene by relatives was handed over to 'Stan' Jones by Peter Eaton, and via 'Bob' Miller, it found its way into the possession of 'Ron' Cook, who in turn took the said silencer to the lab' for the attention of Glynis Howard on the 13th August 1985. At this time, according to 'Ron' Cook, this particular silencer did not have a signed exhibit label attached to it, so Cook himself attached a brown CJA exhibit label to it, marking it, ' SJ/1'. He states that he did not know that 'Stan' Jones had a middle Christian name, hence why he marked the label, 'SJ/1'...

We also learn, that both Cook and Howard signed 'that' brown CJA label which Cook had marked with the exhibit reference of 'SJ/1', at positions, two and three. Cook leaving the first position empty so that the finder of this silencer could sign the label there...

[Adam]

What do you mean expertly? an idiot could have done that.
Anyway the silencer was a red herring.

No Buddy. You need to create the back splatter effect into the silencer baffles. With Sheila's blood. Thread already created.

[David1819]

It was impossible for the relatives to expertly put Sheila's blood into the silencer. Thread created.

The silencer can be unscrewed and taken apart without any tools. They took possession of Sheila's blood stained underwear. means motive and opportunity is all there.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained ?  They would certainly be seriously prosecuted as criminals for trying to frame an innocent man of killing his family.

If you believe Jeremy took the risk of trying to frame an innocent women of the killing her family then there is nothing to preclude you to believe the alternative.

Its a much easier task to plant blood in a moderator than it its to murder five people and engineer it to look like a murder suicide

[mike tesko]

We also learn, that both Cook and Howard signed 'that' brown CJA label which Cook had marked with the exhibit reference of 'SJ/1', at positions, two and three. Cook leaving the first position empty so that the finder of this silencer could sign the label there...

Here, we can view the brown CJA label that both Cook, and Howard signed at positions, two and three. The signature which appears at position one of the same label belongs to the gun dealer, Radcliffe...

[Adam]

The silencer can be unscrewed and taken apart without any tools. They took possession of Sheila's blood stained underwear. means motive and opportunity is all there.


If you believe Jeremy took the risk of trying to frame an innocent women of the killing her family then there is nothing to preclude you to believe the alternative.

Its a much easier task to plant blood in a moderator than it its to murder five people and engineer it to look like a murder suicide

Bamber is an 'Inheritance Killer'. Of which there are several. The rewards were worth the small risks.

I have yet to know of relatives who had nothing to with a crime, try to frame another innocent relative after the event. Espescially of 5x murder.

[buddy]

No Buddy. You need to create the back splatter effect into the silencer baffles. With Sheila's blood. Thread already created.

OK Adam from memory it was about the fourth baffle the blood was found, so by some miracle the blood passed three baffles without touching. How about using an eye dropper with blood in it, pushing past the first three baffles. That is what I think Jones did, after all he had access to Sheila's blood.

[buddy]

Bamber is an 'Inheritance Killer'. Of which there are several. The rewards were worth the small risks.

I have yet to know of relatives who had nothing to with a crime, try to frame another innocent relative after the event. Espescially of 5x murder.

Don't you get it the family were relatives Adam.

[buddy]

Why did the family give Jones a job as head of security at the caravan park when they knew he was a drunkard?

[lookout]

That's just it buddy,they weren't " blood " relatives,which was motive enough " to help police with their enquiries ".
I'm sure I would have done if I'd been that way inclined and the result was half a million !!

[buddy]

Peter eaton certainly was not impressed by Jones when he just chucked the silencer [tainted] into the boot of the car