Author Topic: What makes Bamber innocent?  (Read 348307 times)

0 Members and 76 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3300 on: July 20, 2016, 04:49:AM »
Cops who shot and killed Sheila, have effectively waived their right to a reliance upon 'self-defence' because of the cop cover up...

Misuse of the blood / paint contaminated silencer with its introduction was enough of a distraction to fool the jury into convicting Bamber of the murders. The most damning piece of the prosecutions case being a reliance upon the disturbing claim that the blood found inside 'the' silencer belonged uniquely and exclusively to Sheila Caffell, when as we have now learned that it was 'not'. This deception of the prosecution caused intolerable damage to the prospect of Jeremy Bamber being acquitted by the jury because the responsibility for the killings, including his sister's, was put to the jury on the footing that 'it' could only have been Bamber or his sister who did it. This proposition was clearly wrong similar in its seriousness and magnitude to the 'cut off time' of 3.15pm in the 'Hillsboro' tragedy. Use and a reliance upon the suggestion that either, and only Jeremy or his sister was the killer served to mislead the jury, firstly because Sheila had been one of the victims and she was not on trial or ever in peril of being convicted in law of anything, and secondly, unbeknown to the jury at the time of the October 1986 Chelmsford Crown court trial, that Sheila's body was at the centre of a significant controversy involving it's whereabouts inside the farmhouse when armed cops first came upon it. This related to the reported presence of a dead female body downstairs in the kitchen, initially based upon a mistaken sighting by PC Collins on looking in through the kitchen window, which was immediately cleared up once armed cops entered the kitchen of the farmhouse, because PC Collins realised by that stage that the body he had seen in the kitchen from his original vantage point outside the kitchen window looking in, had been the body of Ralph Bamber, not as was first thought to have been the body of a female. However, that was not the end of the controversy because another report of an 'additional'  females body was reported as being present inside the kitchen in addition to when Ralph Bambers body had been confirmed as being found there (7.37am) 'THE BODY OF ONE DEAD MALE, AND THE BODY OF ONE DEAD FEMALE, FOUND ON ENTRY TO KITCHEN'. (7.38am) 'One dead male, ONE DEAD FEMALE'. (7.42am) 'Can someone contact the police surgeon and Coroner's Officer, regarding TWO BODIES'. Within minutes of these messages being passed, a Civilian employee who was on duty back in the control room at Chelmsford police station, had contacted DS Davidson (SOCO) at his home address by telephone at 7.45am, requesting that he ' attend the office because police were dealing with an incident at whf'  involving a murder, and 'A SUICIDE'. By 8.10am the remaining three bodies were reportedly found upstairs...

Had this well documented account not been deliberately concealed from the court during the trial, the jury would have been entitled to ask the question, ' if Sheila's body had originally been downstairs in the kitchen from first entry into the kitchen by armed cops, how had her body managed to end up on the bedroom floor upstairs in her parents bedroom'? Another question would surely have been, was Sheila still alive at 'the' time, and if not why had police carried her body from the kitchen up to the bedroom, and more significantly, at what stage had this ' displacement' of her body from the kitchen downstairs to the bedroom upstairs, occurred? Linked to this issue, is the damning admission known about back in the control room that police at the scene by 7.45am were already dealing with the discovery of two bodies, one' a murder', the other 'a suicide'. All the other four victims in the tragedy had suffered multiple gun shot wounds, so the reference to one of the two bodies found upon entry to the kitchen had to have been (female body) a specific reference to Sheila.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2016, 09:01:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3301 on: July 20, 2016, 09:12:AM »
Misuse of the blood / paint contaminated silencer with its introduction was enough of a distraction to fool the jury into convicting Bamber of the murders. The most damning piece of the prosecutions case being a reliance upon the disturbing claim that the blood found inside 'the' silencer belonged uniquely and exclusively to Sheila Caffell, when as we have now learned that it was 'not'. This deception of the prosecution caused intolerable damage to the prospect of Jeremy Bamber being acquitted by the jury because the responsibility for the killings, including his sister's, was put to the jury on the footing that 'it' could only have been Bamber or his sister who did it. This proposition was clearly wrong similar in its seriousness and magnitude to the 'cut off time' of 3.15pm in the 'Hillsboro' tragedy. Use and a reliance upon the suggestion that either, and only Jeremy or his sister was the killer served to mislead the jury, firstly because Sheila had been one of the victims and she was not on trial or ever in peril of being convicted in law of anything, and secondly, unbeknown to the jury at the time of the October 1986 Chelmsford Crown court trial, that Sheila's body was at the centre of a significant controversy involving it's whereabouts inside the farmhouse when armed cops first came upon it. This related to the reported presence of a dead female body downstairs in the kitchen, initially based upon a mistaken sighting by PC Collins on looking in through the kitchen window, which was immediately cleared up once armed cops entered the kitchen of the farmhouse, because PC Collins realised by that stage that the body he had seen in the kitchen from his original vantage point outside the kitchen window looking in, had been the body of Ralph Bamber, not as was first thought to have been the body of a female. However, that was not the end of the controversy because another report of an 'additional'  females body was reported as being present inside the kitchen in addition to when Ralph Bambers body had been confirmed as being found there (7.37am) 'THE BODY OF ONE DEAD MALE, AND THE BODY OF ONE DEAD FEMALE, FOUND ON ENTRY TO KITCHEN'. (7.38am) 'One dead male, ONE DEAD FEMALE'. (7.42am) 'Can someone contact the police surgeon and Coroner's Officer, regarding TWO BODIES'. Within minutes of these messages being passed, a Civilian employee who was on duty back in the control room at Chelmsford police station, had contacted DS Davidson (SOCO) at his home address by telephone at 7.45am, requesting that he ' attend the office because police were dealing with an incident at whf'  involving a murder, and 'A SUICIDE'. By 8.10am the remaining three bodies were reportedly found upstairs...

Had this well documented account not been deliberately concealed from the court during the trial, the jury would have been entitled to ask the question, ' if Sheila's body had originally been downstairs in the kitchen from first entry into the kitchen by armed cops, how had her body managed to end up on the bedroom floor upstairs in her parents bedroom'? Another question would surely have been, was Sheila still alive at 'the' time, and if not why had police carried her body from the kitchen up to the bedroom, and more significantly, at what stage had this ' displacement' of her body from the kitchen downstairs to the bedroom upstairs, occurred? Linked to this issue, is the damning admission known about back in the control room that police at the scene by 7.45am were already dealing with the discovery of two bodies, one' a murder', the other 'a suicide'. All the other four victims in the tragedy had suffered multiple gun shot wounds, so the reference to one of the two bodies found upon entry to the kitchen had to have been (female body) a specific reference to Sheila.

Additionally, the jury were entitled to know that prior to Sheila's body ending up on the floor of her parents bedroom with the anshuzt rifle upon it, that some evidence existed to suggest that her body had at one stage been laid on top of the bed, with the body of her mother, and with a Bible on her chest. The rifle said to have been laid in-between the two bodies there. If true then Sheila's body had been reportedly found downstairs in the kitchen upon entry along with the body of her adoptive father Ralph Bamber, and 'it' had also been upstairs on the bed in her parents bedroom with the body of her adoptive mother, and 'it' had ended up on the bedroom floor with the anshuzt rifle on her body. The jury were entitled to know about these facts in coming to a decision as to whether or not, Jeremy had been responsible for killing her, or whether or not she had taken her own life? Additionally, it opened the door for the argument that police might have shot her...
« Last Edit: July 20, 2016, 09:14:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3302 on: July 20, 2016, 09:22:AM »
Key prosecution witnesses collectively and deliberately kept the truth hidden from the jury regarding the positioning of Sheila's body at different stages of the police operation in-between 7.37am, and 10 am, during which time Sheila's body had 'migrated' from its original position of being present in the kitchen, to being present on her parents bed (after 8.10am), to 'it' ending up on the floor to the left hand edge of the bed as viewed from the foot of the bed. Ironically, her mother's body had ended up on the bedroom floor near the doorway of the bedroom, to the right hand side of the bed, if viewed from the same vantage point....
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3303 on: July 20, 2016, 09:27:AM »
One by one, the prosecution witnesses filed into the courtroom, guarding secrets which would almost certainly have collapsed the case, if anyone of them had made mention of, or blurted out, the fact that at a particular time Sheila's body was in this place, or that place, other than it eventually ending up on the bedroom floor with the rifle from the window upon it...
« Last Edit: July 20, 2016, 09:27:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3304 on: July 20, 2016, 09:29:AM »
One by one, the prosecution witnesses filed into the courtroom, guarding secrets which would almost certainly have collapsed the case, if anyone of them had made mention of, or blurted out, the fact that at a particular time Sheila's body was in this place, or that place, other than it eventually ending up on the bedroom floor with the rifle from the window upon it...

What a wicked, awful thing to do, all such witnesses are vile evil monsters...
« Last Edit: July 20, 2016, 12:08:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3305 on: July 20, 2016, 09:30:AM »
Let's identify all of these vile evil monsters that call themselves 'human beings'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3306 on: July 20, 2016, 09:32:AM »
Let's identify all of these vile evil monsters that call themselves 'human beings'...

The eight members of the armed raid team, Collins, Woodcock, Manners, Rozga, Webb, Hall, Delgado, and Alexander - Smart. These eight armed coppers know with 100% certainty that Ralph and Sheila's body were both present downstairs in the so called main kitchen long before Sheila's body became displaced upstairs onto the bed...
« Last Edit: July 20, 2016, 09:44:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3307 on: July 20, 2016, 09:43:AM »
The eight members of the armed raid team, Collins, Woodcock, Manners, Rozga, Webb, Hall, Delgado, and Alexander - Smart. These eight armed coppers know with 100% certainty that Ralph and Sheila's body were both present downstairs in the so called main kitchen long before Sheila's body became displaced upstairs onto the bed...

Then you had the following senior officers situated in the forward control point which was situated in an outbuilding close by in the vicinity of the barns. These included Adams, Montgomery, Harris, Gibbons and Wright. All of these senior officers knew the truth regarding the 'migrating' features involving the body of Sheila Caffell from one location inside white house farm, from 'it' original position downstairs in the kitchen, to the bed upstairs in the so called main bedroom, until 'it' was eventually moved onto the bedroom floor...
« Last Edit: July 20, 2016, 09:47:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3308 on: July 20, 2016, 09:52:AM »
Then you had the occupants of CA07 (News, Myall, and Saxby) who between them whilst babysitting Jeremy, who performed Communication duties, relaying messages that were being passed from the armed raid team inside the farmhouse, to the senior officers situated in the forward control point, to staff back in the control room. All these people belonging to all these groups knew the 'absolute truth', regarding the 'migrating facets involving the body of Sheila Caffell...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3309 on: July 20, 2016, 09:57:AM »
Other senior Officers who arrived at the scene 'after' 9am, learned the history of events regarding the movement of Sheila from and into other parts of the farmhouse, but they witnessed Sheila's body on the bed before 'it' was moved onto the bedroom floor, from the bed. These included DCI 'Taff' Jones, DI 'Bob' Cook, DS 'Stan' Jones, DC 'Mick' Clarke, DC Hammered, DS Davidson, and PC 'David' Bird...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3310 on: July 20, 2016, 10:40:AM »
Other senior Officers who arrived at the scene 'after' 9am, learned the history of events regarding the movement of Sheila from and into other parts of the farmhouse, but they witnessed Sheila's body on the bed before 'it' was moved onto the bedroom floor, from the bed. These included DCI 'Taff' Jones, DI 'Bob' Cook, DS 'Stan' Jones, DC 'Mick' Clarke, DC Hammered, DS Davidson, and PC 'David' Bird...

Later that same morning, between them, DS 'Stan' Jones, and DC 'Mick' Clark, were present at Jeremy's cottage, when when between them, one or other, or both of them informed Ann Eaton and the other relatives who were present there that the bodies of Sheila and June had been on the bed, with the rifle laid on the bed between them, and that Sheila had got a Bible on her chest - so, the relatives themselves knew about Sheila's body being 'on the bed's, before it somehow ended up on the floor to the left hand side of the bed. Yet, despite later finding out that Sheila's body was photographed on the bedroom floor in possession of the anshuzt rifle, none of the relatives chose to try to make an issue of them being told on the same morning of the shootings that Sheila's body had been on the bed, along with the body of her adoptive mother. It is somewhat puzzling as to why the relatives should all remain mute in this matter considering that at every available opportunity they complained to Essex police about this, that, and the other? Why didn't the relatives mention any of this whilst testifying during the October, 1986 trial?

'Selective', that's the approach these relatives took, they only saw fit to mention things which strengthened their own position, and if they had alerted the court to the 'fact' that cops had told them that Sheila's body had been on the bed in the bedroom when 'Stan' Jones, and 'Mick' Clark had seen it there before leaving the scene to come to Jeremy's cottage, it would have tended to favour Jeremy's innocence in her death circumstances...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3311 on: July 20, 2016, 10:42:AM »
Newspaper reports of the day, place the bodies of Sheila and June, on the bed with the anshuzt rifle between both bodies, and with a Bible on top of Sheila's body...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3312 on: July 20, 2016, 12:07:PM »
One of the 'Commanders' of the police operation at the scene (from 5am to 8.30am), PS Adams did not enter the farmhouse until around 9am. At this time, he visited the main bedroom where the bodies of Sheila and June ended up. At a debriefing held later that same evening at Witham police station, Adams voiced his concern that the position of Sheila's body which was captured in PC Birds crime scene photographs shown to everyone present, appeared to suggest that her body had been moved after he had viewed it, for Sheila's body to have ended up in the position shown in the photographs...

Years later (1991) when Adams was interviewed as part of the 'COLP' inquiry, he told them that when he first viewed the scene in the main bedroom that in discussion with other officers present there at the time, how it appeared that June and Sheila had been engaged in Bible study shortly before the mayhem ensued. Now, this is very interesting because it involves mention of a Bible, which despite 30 years having already elapsed still remains 'unaccounted' for. In total it is known that there should have been four separate Bibles in use at the farmhouse, yet one of them (either, DRH/33, or DRH/44) is 'missing. If Sheila and June had been Bible reading as touched upon by Adams in his 'COLP' interview, it suggests the use of two Bibles in the main bedroom, not only one. I am tending to favour a different Bible on Sheila's chest when her body was on the bed, and a different Bible near her body when cops moved her body from the bed to the floor. Locating the whereabouts of this missing Bible is paramount toward reconstructing what cops did with, to, or in response to Sheila's body, right up until the moment PC Bird started to take photographs after the bodies had been staged by the cops themselves. Then there is the issue of the anshuzt rifle which ended up on Sheila's body, where just prior to this and in accordance with what 'Stan' Jones, and 'Mick' Clark told relatives at Jeremy's cottage on that first morning of the investigation, that the rifle was laid on the bed in-between the bodies of Sheila and June...

At 7.15am that morning, APC Julia Healed spotted the barrel of 'that' rifle leaning against the side of a first floor window. It is irrelevant for the purposes of trying to keep things simple, at which upstairs window the barrel of this rifle was seen at. All that matters is that 'the rifle was at one of the upstairs windows at around 7.15am, where previously no such rifle had been present. The rifle therefore which was at an upstairs window at that stage, could not also have been laid on the bed in-between the bodies of Sheila and June, or upon Sheila's body on the bedroom floor clasped hug tight against her abdomen by her right hand, since the said rifle was either leaning against an upstairs window, or it was laid on the bed, or it was on top of Sheila's body, at around or by 7.15am, the same rifle could not have been in two places at one and the same time. No, I will rephrase that for the purpose of being entirely specific, ' the said rifle could not be in three different places all at the same time (window, bed, floor). At 7.15am, however, WPC Jeapes had accurately trained her eye with use of the scope afixed to her rifle on one particular first floor window where the barrel of a rifle had abruptly appeared out of nowhere...

Whilst in the process of reporting what she could see back to the Commander (Seargent. Adams) at the forward control point, Jeapes noticed the armed six man raid party making its approach to enter the farmhouse. Without any doubt then long before the first cop set foot inside the farmhouse, of key importance to all and sundry was the presence of the rifle at one of the upstairs windows. A rifle had abruptly appeared there out of the blue, at a window at which for the previous three hours or so, no rifle had been present...

This tells a trained investigator a lot of things...

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3313 on: July 20, 2016, 12:10:PM »
Where had 'that' rifle been for the previous three hours, or so?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3314 on: July 20, 2016, 10:10:PM »
How utterly bizarre, therefore, that once armed cops trespassed beyond the threshold of the back door which had been battered from its two hinges by five heavy and consecutive sledge hammer blows, that at no stage or any point did any member of the six / eight man raid team mention seeing, or finding any rifle leaning near any upstairs window? The only rifle found upstairs in any of the first floor rooms, so we are led to believe, was the .22 anshuzt rifle which after 10 am, PC 'David' Bird, had photographed upon Sheila's body once cops had moved Sheila and the rifle, from the bed. So, let's be clear about what I am reporting here, the journey of 'that' rifle which ended up at just after 10 am, being plonked on Sheila's body, presumably by PC Bird himself, since upon first entering the farmhouse, 'Ron' Cook had told him, 'to make sure that he got photographs showing the correct position of the gun on Sheila's body's...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...