I am not misquoting anything. You are simply making up excuses to avoid finding a plausible alternative answer because you cant find one. You say I am a xxxx xxxx xxx xxx xxxxx simply to manipulate the forum members in the hope they wont listen to me. You cant debate me so you resort to tenuous smear xxxx xxxx xxxxxx against me instead.
Oh no Caroline 
The significance of posting what you have written in the past shows everyone here that you KNOW Julie Mugford has no credibility and you KNOW and FULLY UNDERSTAND in great detail why her testimony does not add up. Thus you KNOW the case against Jeremy is bogus 
it is you that is the insidious one.
You know there is not a shred evidence that's why you post xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx, No substancial evidence worth the time of day. Just xxxxxxxxxx, xxxx and xxxxxxxxx to try and stain Jeremy's character and then diverting attention away from genuine evidence you don't like to discuss. There is certainly an underlying motive here, as you do not produce any valid reason as to why you believe Jeremy is guilty, Then when pressed on it you become evasive.
Still accusing me of stealing things you never thought of or never worked out another xxxxxxxxxxx x xxxx xxxxxxx of yours
Your the one who got personal because what I bring the forum gets in the way of your xxxxxxxxxx xxx you have xxxxxxxxxxxx committed yourself to.
You are misquoting, RB said that SHEILA WOULD HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH LOADING THE RIFLE. You're dishonest David - completely dishonest. Instead of quoting what he actually said, you chose to post an inaccurate account, even though you must have seen his actual words but chose to post what suited your agender.
You have become obsessed but not because you think Jeremy is innocent, but because you think you might get something out of it. You're not even a supporter!!
Telling me what I think makes you look like an idiot, you can keep saying there is no evidence and misquote things to serve that purpose but your arguments fall flat every time and your dishonesty becomes more and more obvious which makes your comment about 'genuine evidence' laughable. You bend the truth to defend Jeremy but have nothing to support that Sheila was responsible - if you think her palm print on the bible makes her look guilty, then you are more deluded than I thought you were. Stain Jeremy's character? I think a lot of people got there before me on that one - he's a convicted murderer for gods sake and one that EVEN YOU can't say is innocent!
Let me make this plain for you and draw you a picture so that you can understand once and for all and that other members will be clear also - I first brought up the notion of the palm print, you cottoned onto it and thought you could use it to your OWN advantage. You quizzed me about it and used what I said (implications for the hand swabs etc.) as a
BASIS for your report - you even included the dimensions of the bible from one of my posts. I made a guess when you asked me that question and the dimensions in your report are incorrect! I have PM's where you admitted "There is some truth to my accusations", even going so far as to suggest we collaborate! Like that would EVER be an option when I believe Jeremy is guilty!
I'm laughing at your last sentence - 'what you bring to the forum' you mean misquotes and twisting of the truth? And I'm not the only one who had noticed! If EVER you are called to be a witness at any appeal (like that's going to happen!) - your behaviour here will be brought into question and you will be discredited. I'd have thought you would have wanted to keep a low profile, given what you were 'supposedly' told but you have done nothing but brag and become ever more obsessed as the days go on.
