What makes Bamber innocent?

[susan]

I second that Susan. Could I just say that many of us are unsure of the silencer evidence, but even without it this does not make Jeremy innocent-it means that others introduced false evidence in an attempt to shore up their case.

Hello steve I have always thought EP knew he was guilty but lacked evidence to prove it so kinda engineered some so they had a case for Court

[Adam]

Sure you can believe Jeremy is guilty without the sound moderator, But you must realise that no sound moderator then makes it possible for Sheila to have committed the crime.

There are over a hundred pieces of forensic evidence that shows it wasn't Sheila.

You know this. So I don't know why you say things that are wrong.

[Adam]

Hello steve I have always thought EP knew he was guilty but lacked evidence to prove it so kinda engineered some so they had a case for Court

There is a mountain of forensic and circumstantial evidence. Probably more than in 99% of other cases. Excluding criminals caught red handed or who pleaded guilty.

[David1819]

There are over a hundred pieces of forensic evidence that shows it wasn't Sheila.

You know this. So I don't know why you say things that are wrong.

Things you make up do not count as forensic evidence Adam.

[Adam]

Things you make up do not count as forensic evidence Adam.

It's documented evidence. I don't need to make up 'forensic evidence breakthroughs'.

[Steve_uk]

Hello steve I have always thought EP knew he was guilty but lacked evidence to prove it so kinda engineered some so they had a case for Court

I think Taff Jones just wanted a quiet life and took the easy way out on the day. It looked like a murder suicide and of course who could possibly differentiate on first inspection when a diabolical brother puts a rifle into the hands of his schizophrenic sister and pulls the trigger? It's despicable that he used a mentally ill person to cover his tracks. If anyone has ever witnessed someone like Sheila, struggling bravely with her illness yet not "all there" it's quite conceivable that the crime progressed as it did.

[David1819]

It's documented evidence. I don't need to make up 'forensic evidence breakthroughs'.

No its not, you list things with nothing to support your claims whatsoever. If your saying you have found 99 exhibits of smoking gun evidence that the CPS has missed in the last 30 years maybe you should apply to run the place 

[Adam]

No its not, you list things with nothing to support your claims whatsoever. If your saying you have found 99 exhibits of smoking gun evidence that the CPS has missed in the last 30 years maybe you should apply to run the place 

Well go into the the 35 forensic evidence threads showing over 100 pieces of incriminating evidence. Based on documentation. And prove them all wrong.

Rather than pretending they don't exist and claiming the silencer is the only piece. Although I appreciate this is the tactic of all supporters.

[Caroline]

The police concluded it was Sheila. They found NOTHING to contradict this. Supt Kenneally then reviewed the situation AGAIN and found Sheila responsible.

It was only when the discovery of blood in the sound moderator (the realtives found) around mid September did they have anything to contradict their original conclusions. and to this day it remains the only thing.

The whole case rests on the fact that Sheila could not have committed suicide if the moderator was attached thus Jeremy must have killed her and everyone else. Ironically the only thing that shows Sheila could not have commited the crime you believe to be fake.

The police concluded it was Sheila because Jeremy staged the scene that way. So what evidence (circumstantial or otherwise) shows that Sheila is guilty?

[susan]

I think Taff Jones just wanted a quiet life and took the easy way out on the day. It looked like a murder suicide and of course who could possibly differentiate on first inspection when a diabolical brother puts a rifle into the hands of his schizophrenic sister and pulls the trigger? It's despicable that he used a mentally ill person to cover his tracks. If anyone has ever witnessed someone like Sheila, struggling bravely with her illness yet not "all there" it's quite conceivable that the crime progressed as it did.

Steve excellent post one which I agree with

[Caroline]

Sure you can believe Jeremy is guilty without the sound moderator, But you must realise that no sound moderator then makes it possible for Sheila to have committed the crime.

Without any forensic evidence on her to show she even fired one shot!

[Adam]

The police concluded it was Sheila because Jeremy staged the scene that way. So what evidence (circumstantial or otherwise) shows that Sheila is guilty?

I've already gone through the crime scene of each individual. Using the 2002 appeal as a source. Each crime scene shows it was not Sheila.

David knows this but constantly claims the silencer is the only piece. Although all supporters do this to deflect from the other evidence.

As it happens David rejected my invitation to explain how the silencer was fabricated. Along with everyone else.

[David1819]

Without any forensic evidence on her to show she even fired one shot!

Ive explained the GSR about two dozen times already I'm not going to repeat myself

But answer me this.... Who's prints did they find on the empty shell casings? They cannot be Jeremy's because if they were the police would not claim to this day they never found any prints despite there own results saying otherwise. So why then did Robert Boutfour ask the police to then show him Sheila's fingerprints on the shell casings and then write in his dairy about Jeremy getting Sheila's prints on the bullet casings?

So who's prints were on the bullet cases?...... 

Does not take much detective work to figure out 

[Caroline]

Ive explained the GSR about two dozen times already I'm not going to repeat myself

But answer me this.... Who's prints did they find on the empty shell casings? They cannot be Jeremy's because if they were the police would not claim to this day they never found any prints despite there own results saying otherwise. So why then did Robert Boutfour ask the police to then show him Sheila's fingerprints on the shell casings and then write in his dairy about Jeremy getting Sheila's prints on the bullet casings?

So who's prints were on the bullet cases?...... 

Does not take much detective work to figure out 

What results? And I wasn't talking about GSR

[David1819]

What results? And I wasn't talking about GSR

Ive explained the GRS about 20 times now. if its not going to sink in why repeat myself

As for my last post you simply have no answer then I take it?