What makes Bamber innocent?

[mike tesko]

I was bought up to tell the truth. I fail to see how stating one's beliefs can be said to be dishonest. It WOULD be dishonest, though, if I was to say I believed Jeremy to be innocent, when I, in fact, believe him to be guilty.

I would respond to someone like you by asking you what convinces you that Jeremy was 'guilty'?

There is no 'direct' evidence which points to his culpability!!!

People like you rely upon supposed evidence, from never never land, you fool yourselves into believing something is true, despite there existing contradictory evidence, to the effect that no such evidence exists, at all. Good luck with your fantasies...

Jeremy Bamber did not shoot and kill anybody...

[Caroline]

I am xxxxxxx sick to death, of any members who cannot appreciate that 'bent' cops, often get dodgy witnesses to say exactly what 'the bent cop' wants them to say...

I xxxxxxx 'hate' a bent cop, be 'it' a man, or a woman...

xxxxxxx xxxx'...

Just because people don't agree with you on this matter, doesn't mean that we think the police aren't capable of corruption. I think Bamber is guilty and I am sure if you did, you would spend a second feeling sorry for him. If you can't have a debate without being sworn at, what's the point?

[Caroline]

I would respond to someone like you by asking you what convinces you that Jeremy was 'guilty'?

There is no 'direct' evidence which points to his culpability!!!

People like you rely upon supposed evidence, from never never land, you fool yourselves into believing something is true, despite there existing contradictory evidence,, to the effect that no such evidence exists, at all. Good luck with your fantasies...

This works both ways

[mike tesko]

Just because people don't agree with you on this matter, doesn't mean that we think the police aren't capable of corruption. I think Bamber is guilty and I am sure if you did, you would spend a second feeling sorry for him. If you can't have a debate without being sworn at, what's the point?

You haven't got any xxxxxxx reliable evidence to support the nonsense you are advocating...

[mike tesko]

What a friend you turned out to be, Jeremy is certainly better off without you on his side...

[mike tesko]

What a friend you turned out to be, Jeremy is certainly better off without you on his side...

Why don't you follow in the other members footsteps, and practice your acts of deception on the alternative 'red' forum...

[mike tesko]

This works both ways

How would you feel if the prosecution 'stitched you up? And you were convicted of a series of crimes, and sentenced to any term of imprisonment, or life imprisonment?

You would be almost certainly be 'singing' from an entirely different hymn sheet, if that occurred...

Be thankful...

[Caroline]

How would you feel if the prosecution 'stitched you up? And you were convicted of a series of crimes, and sentenced to any term of imprisonment, or life imprisonment?

You would be almost certainly be 'singing' from an entirely different hymn sheet, if that occurred...

Be thankful...

Of course I would IF I were innocent but I believe that Jeremy is guilty!

[Caroline]

Why don't you follow in the other members footsteps, and practice your acts of deception on the alternative 'red' forum...

I have no acts of deception - but that's fine, I'll leave you to it.

[David1819]

Bit like you when it comes to showing Sheila was responsible YOU CAN'T!

The police concluded it was Sheila. They found NOTHING to contradict this. Supt Kenneally then reviewed the situation AGAIN and found Sheila responsible.

It was only when the discovery of blood in the sound moderator (the realtives found) around mid September did they have anything to contradict their original conclusions. and to this day it remains the only thing.

The whole case rests on the fact that Sheila could not have committed suicide if the moderator was attached thus Jeremy must have killed her and everyone else. Ironically the only thing that shows Sheila could not have commited the crime you believe to be fake.

[susan]

Mike that is not a very nice way to talk to sami he just happens to think Jeremy is guilty and surely he is allowed that on a forum it is all about freedom of speech.

[Steve_uk]

I second that Susan. Could I just say that many of us are unsure of the silencer evidence, but even without it this does not make Jeremy innocent-it means that others introduced false evidence in an attempt to shore up their case.

[guest7363]

Mike that is not a very nice way to talk to sami he just happens to think Jeremy is guilty and surely he is allowed that on a forum it is all about freedom of speech.

Quite true Susan, Mike likes a forum of yes men and cannot handle true debate.  We all cannot be like David, I was never brought up to swear and esp at ladies and I worked in the mines

[David1819]

I second that Susan. Could I just say that many of us are unsure of the silencer evidence, but even without it this does not make Jeremy innocent-it means that others introduced false evidence in an attempt to shore up their case.

Sure you can believe Jeremy is guilty without the sound moderator, But you must realise that no sound moderator then makes it possible for Sheila to have committed the crime.

[susan]

Quite true Susan, Mike likes a forum of yes men and cannot handle true debate.  We all cannot be like David, I was never brought up to swear and esp at ladies and I worked in the mines

Justice I have always known you were a gentleman but David is a nice guy too and never swears Mike gets so cross and forgets who he is talking to bet he feels awful afterwards when I thought Jeremy innocent he never said a wrong word to me just think he has loads to deal with I know that is no excuse but I always try and understand why people behave like they do.