What makes Bamber innocent?

[mike tesko]

Lets bring back 'hanging' for all lying prosecution witnesses, and its supporters, who support such a scenario...

[Jane]

The relatives, and the cops (under pressure), manipulated the 'truth', which can be emphasized in clear unambiguous terms...

OR the truth told has been manipulated, misrepresented and emphasised in WHOLLY ambiguous terms.

[mike tesko]

beautifully worded jane, :) :)

The facts are that, the prosecution witnesses, hadn't got a clue about the deception being introduced, or relied upon by any of the prosecutions, witnesses...

[Jane]

Lets bring back 'hanging' for all lying prosecution witnesses, and its supporters, who support such a scenario...

AND for all those who scream their innocence when in fact they're guilty as hell.

[mike tesko]

OR the truth told has been manipulated, misrepresented and emphasised in WHOLLY ambiguous terms.

My position, has always been to 'try and establish the truth', I will leave the 'bullshit' to others...

[sami]

Lets bring back 'hanging' for all lying prosecution witnesses, and its supporters, who support such a scenario...

yes and also  for child killers like jb,iam all for that

[David1819]

Just about anything is possible "in theory". Theory, as opposed to fact, CAN produce con artists and glory seekers.

And what "facts" may these be 

[mike tesko]

AND for all those who scream their innocence when in fact they're guilty as hell.

No, stop right there, how can you say such a thing without referring to the circumstances of individual prosecutions? THE CPS and cops are 'not' as white, as somebody like you, would have us 'all' believe...

[sami]

And what "facts" may these be 

the facts are 10 out of 12 jury members found jb guilty and and he still is guilty,nothing can change that,he has had appeals and failed them

[mike tesko]

No, stop right there, how can you say such a thing without referring to the circumstances of individual prosecutions? THE CPS and cops are 'not' as white, as somebody like you, would have us 'all' believe...

You are 'swiftly' making yourself as appearing to be 'an agitator', someone who is only interested in anything that makes somebody appear as though 'they were, or are, guilty'...

You come across as someone, not 'interested', in the truth - 'good luck' with the deception you are trying to pull off...

[Caroline]

You believe no sound moderator was used therefore you accept a conspiracy has taken place to manufacture evidence. If you don't believe in a conspiracy then you haven't thought your position through.

Manipulating JM and SB is the easiest part.

I know exactly what I think and who I think was responsible. I wouldn't share that with you though, you would be the last person! They had/have enough without the silencer to show Jeremy is guilty - it was insurance. Whether you agree with it or not - a man who kills 5 people including two small boys deserves a whole life tariff.

I didn't just mention JM and SB - you know that though!

Oh by the way, I have done a list of circumstantial evidence with just a little more to do - however, I will post it AFTER you show us the evidence that points to Sheila.

[David1819]

the facts are 10 out of 12 jury members found jb guilty and and he still is guilty,nothing can change that,he has had appeals and failed them

Having a conviction does mean you committed the crime, only in an ideal world is that the case

[David1819]

I know exactly what I think and who I think was responsible. I wouldn't share that with you though, you would be the last person! They had/have enough without the silencer to show Jeremy is guilty - it was insurance. Whether you agree with it or not - a man who kills 5 people including two small boys deserves a whole life tariff.

I didn't just mention JM and SB - you know that though!

Oh by the way, I have done a list of circumstantial evidence with just a little more to do - however, I will post it AFTER you show us the evidence that points to Sheila.

You keep saying this but when asked to elaborate or show evidence your like.............

[Jane]

You are 'swiftly' making yourself as appearing to be 'an agitator', someone who is only interested in anything that makes somebody appear as though 'they were, or are, guilty'...

You come across as someone, not 'interested', in the truth - 'good luck' with the deception you are trying to pull off...

And why not when someone is guilty?  You are trying to make someone, who MANY believe to be guilty, appear to be innocent. Where is the truth in that?  Your accusation works both ways, Mike.

[Caroline]

You are 'swiftly' making yourself as appearing to be 'an agitator', someone who is only interested in anything that makes somebody appear as though 'they were, or are, guilty'...

You come across as someone, not 'interested', in the truth - 'good luck' with the deception you are trying to pull off...

Jane isn't an agitator at all, she, like me and others, believe that Jeremy is guilty as sin and don't want him walking the streets.