How utterly remarkable, that two different assistants ('BAKER' and 'BIRCH') confirm the presence of animal bloods on the silencer on both the 13th August, and the 13th September 1985, and nobody remembers to tell the defence about this? Worse still, the jury were not given this vital information either...
Was it of interest that, for example, one of the four blood groups enzymes detected in the flake (AK1) belonged to both animals (rabbits), and humans?
Of course'it was', but the court was not told about it by the blood experts, 'Glynis Howard', or 'John Hayward', but had they been, the jury would have surely been warned about relying upon the AK1 type blood found inside the silencer in the form of the flake, because it was a 50 / 50 chance of 'it' being animal blood, or human blood. A feature strengthened by the presence of rabbits blood found on the outside of the same silencer...
That would have left the prosecution, and the defence with only three blood group results to argue with, A, EAP BA and HP 2-1...
Of course it would have made a huge difference, since it then became an equal possibility for these three blood results to have originated from both June Bamber or Sheila Caffell, or both of them, or an intimate mixture of June Bambers and Ralph Bambers blood, or Ralph Bambers and Sheila Caffells bloods. Certainly not the nailed on certainty that was presented to the court at trial, along the lines of it belonged 'exclusively' to Sheila Caffell...
So, the blood experts, Howard and Hayward, along with their assistants BAKER and BIRCH, sought to deceive the court, and it worked in favour of the prosecutions case to a treat, a dishonest treat...
