Author Topic: What makes Bamber innocent?  (Read 348286 times)

0 Members and 31 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2310 on: June 04, 2016, 02:39:PM »
There is only the word of the relatives that the silencer was ever present inside that gun cupboard on Saturday, the 10th September, 1985, when David Boutflour supposedly 'found it' there. The key players in its introduction into the folklore of this case, were (1) David Boutflour, (2) Ann Eaton, his sister, and (3) Robert Boutflour, their father...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2311 on: June 04, 2016, 02:44:PM »
There is only the word of the relatives that the silencer was ever present inside that gun cupboard on Saturday, the 10th September, 1985, when David Boutflour supposedly 'found it' there. The key players in its introduction into the folklore of this case, were (1) David Boutflour, (2) Ann Eaton, his sister, and (3) Robert Boutflour, their father...

In other versions of 'the find' the 'executor of the parents estates (Basil John Cock) was present'. But, he did not attend the house until September, 1985. He making mention of how much white fingerprint powder was on everything on that visit. Cops did not start fingerprinting until September 1985, so this sheds more light on when the true introduction of the silencer (DRB/1) must have occurred (September, not August)...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2312 on: June 04, 2016, 02:47:PM »
Whichever way you look at it, the relatives were solely responsible for the introduction of the silencer (DRB/1), containing the blood, and paint evidence...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2313 on: June 04, 2016, 02:49:PM »
Whichever way you look at it, the relatives were solely responsible for the introduction of the silencer (DRB/1), containing the blood, and paint evidence...

They introduced 'it' at best on the 12th August 1985, and at worst on the 11th September 1985...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2314 on: June 04, 2016, 02:59:PM »
Bamber and Bamber alone is responsible for his circumstances.




You'd better think again.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20872
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2315 on: June 04, 2016, 03:02:PM »
In other versions of 'the find' the 'executor of the parents estates (Basil John Cock) was present'. But, he did not attend the house until September, 1985. He making mention of how much white fingerprint powder was on everything on that visit. Cops did not start fingerprinting until September 1985, so this sheds more light on when the true introduction of the silencer (DRB/1) must have occurred (September, not August)...
Didn't Jeremy make some reference to the fingerprint powder?

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13705
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2316 on: June 04, 2016, 04:08:PM »
No need, this allegation that he was framed is pure pish!

unfortunately it is not

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2317 on: June 04, 2016, 04:23:PM »
unfortunately it is not

I agree - but he's still guilty.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2318 on: June 04, 2016, 07:38:PM »
I agree - but he's still guilty.




The only thing that JB's guilty of is not getting himself a decent defence.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2319 on: June 04, 2016, 07:51:PM »



The only thing that JB's guilty of is not getting himself a decent defence.

Perhaps his defence didn't feel he gave them enough to defend.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2320 on: June 04, 2016, 07:59:PM »
Perhaps his defence didn't feel he gave them enough to defend.

Hard to defend the indefensible.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2321 on: June 04, 2016, 08:03:PM »
Hard to defend the indefensible.


There certainly wouldn't be much enthusiasm, especially if it sounded as if the prosecution was going to wipe the floor with them.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2322 on: June 04, 2016, 09:46:PM »
I think the defence knew he did it.  They certainly were of the opinion he had psychopathic tendencies.

I agree John. It's hard to hide the kind of resentment he must have been harbouring. Rejected at birth and packed off to boarding school - he didn't seem to have any of his own friends. People say he didn't show any anger, I think it's odd that he was so controlled - bit like a pressure cooker - calm on the outside, but boiling away on the inside. The crime scene showed a lot of anger. Sheila didn't bottle things up and she was willing to confront things from her past - like meeting her natural mother. Jeremy saying he wasn't bothered about meeting his, is hard to believe.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2323 on: June 04, 2016, 09:54:PM »
I agree John. It's hard to hide the kind of resentment he must have been harbouring. Rejected at birth and packed off to boarding school - he didn't seem to have any of his own friends. People say he didn't show any anger, I think it's odd that he was so controlled - bit like a pressure cooker - calm on the outside, but boiling away on the inside. The crime scene showed a lot of anger. Sheila didn't bottle things up and she was willing to confront things from her past - like meeting her natural mother. Jeremy saying he wasn't bothered about meeting his, is hard to believe.


Caroline, I can't help but feel that everything which affected Sheila re her adoption must also have affected Jeremy. We know very well that internalized feelings of anger and resentment, if not allowed to be expressed WILL at some point find their own way out in devastating ways. Sheila seems to have been capable of releasing hers in places she felt safe, ie Colin. I believe Jeremy kept his bottled. They'd both have had to live with the physical feelings of abandonment because it goes hand in hand with being adopted.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2324 on: June 04, 2016, 09:55:PM »
Perhaps his defence didn't feel he gave them enough to defend.




No-------------EP had most of it,hidden/undisclosed.