I didn't say it wasn't - that was Reader. I asked to see the unedited picture because the picture you have posted looks (to me) like it was taken after the carpet samples were cut out (hence you can see the underlay) which would be AFTER the bodies were removed. This being the case, the time on the clock means nothing.
DS Davidson did not take carpet samples until 8th August 1985 (ND/10 and ND/11). The problem you are faced with by trying to go down that avenue is that the bodies are there in 'that' bedroom blanked out by somebody else not me. Also bear in mind that the bottom bed sheet and two pillow cases from June Bambers side of the bed were also seized, and most importantly of all, bear in mind that 'this particular photograph, was taken on a 'negative strip', which shows the rifle on Sheila's body insitu either side of this image. That negative strip has been put into the correct sequence by Mr Sutherst. Mr Sutherst is the expert, he not only can tell which strips of negatives were used before any other, or after any other, and he has the expertise to be able to tell which of the individual negative strips which cops cut up to try to conceal the deception they had practised in producing a false and very misleading photographic record to cover up for the 'tampering with the bodies and the rifle', during that training exercise, otherwise known as 'familiars'. In other words call that training exercise, call it 'familiars, but at the end of the day, 'that's when' cops committed the unforgivable naughty deeds that have now come back to bite their arses...
