What makes Bamber innocent?

[mike tesko]

COLP witness statement for DS Neil Davidson, dated, 7th February, 2002...

[mike tesko]

How come this clock isn't visible in the photograph that you've also just posted that shows June's cabinet? Can you post the unedited photograph which shows this clock?

Did you deliberately make your post at 10:20am? No, what a coincidence, though...

Give me a few minutes...

[mike tesko]

Hand swab evidence was 'fundamentally flawed', because cops knew that the bloodied fingers of her right hand had been wiped upon the front lower right part of her nightdress. Most of any firearm residue and or lead deposit got wiped from the fingers of her right hand at this time...

[mike tesko]

In addition, bloodied fingermarks were found upon her own throat, and on the pages of the blue covered bible, and lastly but not least of all, her bloodied fingermarks got deposited on the edge of the kitchen worktop. Was it any wonder that the hand swabs that were eventually tested produced little if any firearm residue, or lead deposits?

[mike tesko]

In addition, bloodied fingermarks were found upon her own throat, and on the pages of the blue covered bible, and lastly but not least of all, her bloodied fingermarks got deposited on the edge of the kitchen worktop. Was it any wonder that the hand swabs that were eventually tested produced little if any firearm residue, or lead deposits?

In addition to all the possible sources where the fingers of Sheila's right hand were wiped, there was also the question of the protective plastic bags placed over both of her hands at the scene, and also the additional factor that cops fingerprinted her right hand...

[mike tesko]

...

[mike tesko]

We are now at the stage where even those who want Jeremy Bamber to be 'the killer', have come to accept that 'Cops moved Sheila's body', and 'they brought the rifle from the bedroom window and cops (not Jeremy) plonked it upon Sheila Caffells body', to give the impression when it came around to photographing her body on the bedroom floor, that 'she had taken her own life, with use of that rifle.'

[mike tesko]

We are now at the stage where even those who want Jeremy Bamber to be 'the killer', have come to accept that 'Cops moved Sheila's body', and 'they brought the rifle from the bedroom window and cops (not Jeremy) plonked it upon Sheila Caffells body', to give the impression when it came around to photographing her body on the bedroom floor, that 'she had taken her own life, with use of that rifle.'

This is very serious...

[mike tesko]

We have got members who think that 'it's alright for cops to stage manage the death scene of a victim', and then 'take photographs' claiming that the body with the rifle has been photographed unmoved, untouched, upstaged, without a cop, a police surgeon, a coroners officer, a firearms officer, or a member of the ambulance crew, so much 'as lift a single hair' on the victims body, until 'after' all the crime scene photographs of her body with that rifle in her possession had been taken...

Worse still...

Some of the images captured on the crime scene video were 'deliberately withheld', because it 'filmed Sheila Caffells body' in 'a different location upon the bed', before cops moved the body to the bedroom floor, at 'a time when the victim only 'sported one gunshot wound to her neck'...

Now...

pay particular attention, to what I am about to say next, because it is highly important and dramatically significant...

[mike tesko]

The CCRC were sensationally given access to 'the crime scene video' after two photographs/ images of Sheila's body upon the bed in the parents bedroom were 'presented to them' by way of being handed in at the CCRC reception to security officers on duty at reception. One of these images showed Sheila Caffells body laying on top of the bed with the hem of her nightie raised above the top of her thighs, so that her dignity was fully exposed, and the other image was a close up view of the region of her neck sporting 'only one gunshot wound', not two...

Once these were received by the CCRC, they contacted Essex police, and lo and behold, Cops produced the 'Crime Scene video footage', which includes scenes of Sheila's body on the bed, then it being moved onto the bedroom floor, including the first images of when 'two shotgun wounds' appeared on her neck after the rifle had been brought to her body from the window. The video footage captured Sheila's body then upon its right side, minus the rifle that fired the second fatal shot, until eventually about 40 minutes later, cops moved her body (again)into its final resting place, brought the rifle back to her body from the window where it had been placed after inflicting the second shot, and placed 'it' firmly into her possession with her hands positioned around or upon it to give an impression that she had shot herself with use of 'that' gun...

The CCRC 'know' that cops shot Sheila on that second (fatal) occasion, because the evidence I am talking about was provided in part to them (voluntarily) and since that pivotal moment reluctantly, in the form of 'that crime scene video footage'. They ended up having to acknowledge to Jeremy that such a video existed and that they had possession of it, but that 'he could not view the images it contains' because the content was too sensitive and upsetting. it is too sensitive, and too upsetting, because it shows Sheila's body being 'abused' by the cops who performed the so called, 'familiars'.  They lifted the hem of her nightie whilst she was laid on the bed and exposed her dignity for the pleasure of these cops who are too embarrassed and ashamed to be named because of the despicable manner with which they abused Sheila's body whilst she was 'not even dead' by that stage. She was clearly, 'not yet dead' because at the time her body was being 'filmed on the bed' as described, she was only sporting one shotgun wound to her neck - cops didn't bring the rifle to her body until 'after' they shifted her body to the bedroom floor...

Cops are responsible for shooting Sheila Caffell and killing her, after they 'abused her body' as described by me. Jeremy himself knows this to be true because he himself has officially complained about it...

[Caroline]

How come this clock isn't visible in the photograph that you've also just posted that shows June's cabinet? Can you post the unedited photograph which shows this clock?

Did you deliberately make your post at 10:20am?

I have asked for this too - but like the attempts to make communication with someone inside the farmhouse, my request has been met with 'no response'.

[mike tesko]

I have asked for this too - but like the attempts to make communication with someone inside the farmhouse, my request has been met with 'no response'.

I beg your pardon, the clock is clearly present on the bedside cabinet in the following images:-

[mike tesko]

You need access to the 'negative strip upon which these images originated from, not my department, cops in control, CCRC incompetent and 'not fit for purpose'...

[Caroline]

I beg your pardon, the clock is clearly present on the bedside cabinet in the following images:-

I didn't say it wasn't - that was Reader. I asked to see the unedited picture because the picture you have posted looks (to me) like it was taken after the carpet samples were cut out (hence you can see the underlay) which would be AFTER the bodies were removed. This being the case, the time on the clock means nothing.

[mike tesko]

The clock is clearly there on June Bambers bedside Cabinet...

All Mr Sutherst had to do, was find out which 'negative strip' the main photograph was taken on, as opposed to the negative strip that photograph number 23 (anshuzt rifle shown leaning near bedroom window) was taken on, and then -  establish which negative strips were used first, second, third, fourth, fifth, etc...

Guess what, it gets even more 'interesting', because PC David Bird, and DI 'Ron' Cook, both lied about the sequence with which the anshuzt rifle photographed at the bedroom window from the vantage point of the middle landing of the main staircase (Photo' 23), as opposed to the same anshuzt rifle being photographed on Sheila's body in photographs, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, were taken. This can now be proven by reference to one of  PC Birds witness statements which he made to COLP, and to the work carried out by Mr Sutherst...