Author Topic: What makes Bamber innocent?  (Read 348305 times)

0 Members and 65 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1365 on: May 22, 2016, 11:05:PM »
Let's examine what cops said about moving bodies and items at the scene 'prior' to photographs being taken:-

« Last Edit: May 22, 2016, 11:28:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1366 on: May 22, 2016, 11:35:PM »
Simples!  It was removed from the body in order to make it safe and render it secure.  Later it was put back for the photo you refer to.  No mystery, no conspiracy!

As or State corruption...PIFFLE!!

That isn't the case.

Photograph 23 was taken after photograph 32.

The numerical references do not indicate the order in which they were taken.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1367 on: May 22, 2016, 11:37:PM »
I will now seek to post the trial transcript of the other 'SOCO's', DS Davidson, PC Bird, and DI 'Ron' Cook, so that we are all 'singing from the same hymn sheet' regarding whether or not, cops moved or touched bodies of victims, the gun, and other items of evidential value. It is my case that all these cops deny moving anything until 'after' PC Bird took his crime scene photographs, with the exception of 'Ron' Cook, who as I have said on previous occasions, moved Sheila's right hand, to allow PC Bird to take 'this photograph'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1368 on: May 22, 2016, 11:53:PM »
That isn't the case.

Photograph 23 was taken after photograph 32.

The numerical references do not indicate the order in which they were taken.

Not according to the expert, Mr Sutherst...

In any event, we all now know that the only rifle found upstairs was 'the anshuzt rifle', and according to WPC Jeapes, and PC Brown, that rifle was leaning near the side of an upstairs window. So, you can perform as many exercises as you wish to try and muddy the waters regarding 'that' rifle being at an upstairs window, before cops brought it to the body. The fact is, who put the rifle at that window at 7.15am, if everybody was already dead inside the farmhouse by 'that' stage? More significantly, how did 'that rifle' end up on Sheila's body at and by 10.20am, that same morning? Because if Sheila had been dead since before 3am, it needs to be explained about the movement of 'that rifle' to the upstairs window by 7.15am, and then onto Sheila's body at just after 10.20am, that morning, because if Sheila was dead like you claim she must have been from a very early stage, then she couldn't have taken the rifle from the aforementioned window after her death and moved it onto her own body, because dead victims can't move around, and pick things up just so what they must have done became part of the prosecutions case, against Jeremy, or as the case may be, against Sheila herself. Cops brought 'that' rifle from the window and put it on Sheila's body, then photographs were taken, and eventually these very same 'faked' photographs were used to brainwash the jury into accepting that it had been Jeremy who had put the rifle onto his sisters body, placed there by him to supposedly fool cops into believing that Sheila had shot herself twice with use of 'that' same rifle and committed suicide. How can J have taken 'that' rifle from 'that' bedroom window after 7.15am, and put it onto his sisters body?
« Last Edit: May 22, 2016, 11:55:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1369 on: May 23, 2016, 12:05:AM »
That isn't the case.

Photograph 23 was taken after photograph 32.

The numerical references do not indicate the order in which they were taken.

Been here before though, once or twice.  :P

23 was taken after the other photographs. Numerical exhibit order is not time/date order.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1370 on: May 23, 2016, 12:17:AM »
Been here before though, once or twice.  :P

Refer to Mr Sutherst's report, and PC Birds COLP interviews, and additional witness statements, about the order strips of serial numbers strips of negatives were used at the scene by him, and his admission that when he testified during the trial in 1986, how he had got the order with which particular photographs had been taken by him. In any event, everybody now knows that the only rifle found upstairs in each of the two versions mentioned by cops, was the anshuzt rifle - placed at an upstairs window by 7.15am, that would later that same morning be photographed on Sheila's body just after 10.20am...

How can Jeremy have put the rifle in question onto his sisters body?
« Last Edit: May 23, 2016, 02:51:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1371 on: May 23, 2016, 12:20:AM »
Let's examine DI 'Ron' Cooks, 39 page, COLP witness statement, dated, Wednesday, 25th September, 1991, to find confirmation, that nobody moved anything or any bodies body until 'after' PC Bird have finished taking photographs:-
« Last Edit: May 23, 2016, 02:05:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1372 on: May 23, 2016, 12:25:AM »
Been here before though, once or twice.  :P




Photograph 23 was taken at 'M'.

Photograph 32 was taken at 'B'.

Claims to the contrary are false.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1373 on: May 23, 2016, 01:29:AM »



Photograph 23 was taken at 'M'.

Photograph 32 was taken at 'B'.

Claims to the contrary are false.

You better get back to the drawing board then chummy, because PC Bird told the COLP investigators that he 'got the sequence with which photographs had been taken - 'WRONG'...

Oooops, yet another clanger by murder scene cops...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1374 on: May 23, 2016, 02:31:AM »
List of trial transcripts in my possession (somewhere)...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1375 on: May 23, 2016, 02:41:AM »
Trial transcript for DI 'Ron' Cook...
« Last Edit: May 23, 2016, 02:47:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1376 on: May 23, 2016, 02:49:AM »
Trial transcript of DS Neil Davidson, will eventually appear her:-
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1377 on: May 23, 2016, 02:50:AM »
Trial Transcript of PC David Bird will eventually appear here:-
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1378 on: May 23, 2016, 02:54:AM »
COLP witness Statement of DS Neil Davidson, consisting of two pages, dated, 3rd September, 2002...
« Last Edit: May 23, 2016, 03:28:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1379 on: May 23, 2016, 02:55:AM »
If we refer to the left hand side of the bed as 'Ralphs' side', and the right hand side of the bed as Junes side', the clock on the bedside cabinet which shows the time as being just after 10.20am is located on the cabinet at the side of Junes side of the bed...
How come this clock isn't visible in the photograph that you've also just posted that shows June's cabinet? Can you post the unedited photograph which shows this clock?

Did you deliberately make your post at 10:20am?