What makes Bamber innocent?

[lookout]

Ask her what? Of course I dare, why wouldn't I? 

That's fair enough.At least I won't see the egg on your face.

[Jane]

Enlarge the image, the clock clearly shows the time 10.20am...

Hmm It says that twice a day.

[sami]

Enlarge the image, the clock clearly shows the time 10.20am...

so what if its 10.20am.that proves what

[sami]

Hmm It says that twice a day.

thats witty jane

[mike tesko]

Now, before you get carried away, I can tell you that the photograph which includes the clock at its time of 10.20am, or just after, shows the anshuz rifle on Sheila's body and that this photograph was taken 20 minutes or so 'after' photograph number 23 which puts the rifle resting next to the bedroom window...

So, please explain to me in as much corrupt language that you or anybody else can think up, to convince me that it was Jeremy Bamber who placed 'that' rifle on his sisters body, and staged her death scene, between 10am and just after 10.20am, that morning?

[mike tesko]

Hmm It says that twice a day.

Stop being stupid, how could cops have photographed the bodies of June and Sheila insitu at just after 10.20pm, either on evening of 6th or 7th August 1985?

[sami]

Now, before you get carried away, I can tell you that the photograph which includes the clock at its time of 10.20am, or just after, shows the anshuz rifle on Sheila's body and that this photograph was taken 20 minutes or so 'after' photograph number 23 which puts the rifle resting next to the bedroom window...

So, please explain to me in as much corrupt language that you or anybody else can think up, to convince me that it was Jeremy Bamber who placed 'that' rifle on his sisters body, and staged her death scene, between 10am and just after 10.20am, that morning?

post the photo so we can see the rifle the body and the clock

[Caroline]

Clock showing time at 10.20am, is on bedside cabinet in main bedroom. This photograph was taken 'after' photograph number 23 (master copy album). The significance being that Rifle 'was' photographed leaning against bedroom window (23)  before cops brought it to Sheila's body and allowed the cops to stage her death scene with her in possession of the same rifle, by now in her possession, at a time when she had two gunshot wounds to her neck...

Why have the bodies been blanked out of the picture Mike? They have been left in most of the others?

[mike tesko]

Stop being stupid, how could cops have photographed the bodies of June and Sheila insitu at just after 10.20pm, either on evening of 6th or 7th August 1985?

These cops are in 'big' trouble...

[mike tesko]

Why have the bodies been blanked out of the picture Mike? They have been left in most of the others?

For decency...

[sami]

These cops are in 'big' trouble...

which cops and in trouble with who

[Jane]

Now, before you get carried away, I can tell you that the photograph which includes the clock at its time of 10.20am, or just after, shows the anshuz rifle on Sheila's body and that this photograph was taken 20 minutes or so 'after' photograph number 23 which puts the rifle resting next to the bedroom window...

So, please explain to me in as much corrupt language that you or anybody else can think up, to convince me that it was Jeremy Bamber who placed 'that' rifle on his sisters body, and staged her death scene, between 10am and just after 10.20am, that morning?

You may have failed to notice, Mike, but I would NEVER lower myself to using corrupt language. It matters little what time the clock say. It is perfectly reasonable to accept that the police removed said rifle FROM Sheila to make it safe, leaned it against the window, took pictures and returned it to where they'd originally found it. It makes far more sense that what you're saying. The more convoluted the tale -as with yours- the less likely it is to be true.

[Caroline]

For decency...

But they aren't blanked out in any other pictures - we have lots of pictures in the archives so don't understand why in this particular picture, you have blanked them out?

[sami]

You may have failed to notice, Mike, but I would NEVER lower myself to using corrupt language. It matters little what time the clock say. It is perfectly reasonable to accept that the police removed said rifle FROM Sheila to make it safe, leaned it against the window, took pictures and returned it to where they'd originally found it. It makes far more sense that what you're saying. The more convoluted the tale -as with yours- the less likely it is to be true.

thats exactly how it happened jane

[mike tesko]

post the photo so we can see the rifle the body and the clock

This evidence that I am talking about and which I have drawn your attention to is a compelling reason / grounds that 'will' lead to the quashing of Jeremy Banners convictions. This is because, it can now be proven by reference to two crime scene photographs taken by PC Bird, that the anshuzt rifle was photographed resting against the bedroom window (23), before the rifle was brought by the cops from the window, and placed on Sheila Caffells body, (photo's 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32) and her death scene staged by 10.20am, or thereabouts, to make it appear as though Sheila had shot herself twice with 'that' rifle. But the truth of the matter was that she was only shot 'once' by use of 'that' gun upstairs in the bedroom. I will leave it to you to try to fathom out which gun was used to shoot her downstairs in the kitchen with the anshuzt rifle still resting at the window upstairs by the time cops reported a dead female downstairs in the kitchen from 7.37am, onward...