What makes Bamber innocent?

[Caroline]

Wrong.  Bews said Myalls said "I think I saw someone".  Skip about first 3 mins.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/video/2011/jan/30/jeremy-bamber-new-evidence-video

You don't believe the silencer Caroline.  So I assume you think corruption noble is ok?  Why did everyone need to make up the silencer if the case against Jeremy was strong?  I will start a thread on this tomorrow. 

Off to bed now.  Up early to feed my two horses 

That's what I said, they are talking about MOVEMENT and NOT a figure. Since then it's become a figure which has now grown legs and even has a name.

No I don't believe in the silencer and I do think he would still have been convicted without it - no I don't believe in noble cause corruption or in guilty people being allowed to get off scot free on a technicality.

Do I think faking the silencer was fair - no
Do I think Jeremy is guilty - yes
Do I think he should gain his freedom if the silencer is ever proven to have been faked - no
Do I think it would be fair for him to have a retrial - yes.

[sami]

That's what I said, they are talking about MOVEMENT and NOT a figure. Since then it's become a figure which has now grown legs and even has a name.

No I don't believe in the silencer and I do think he would still have been convicted without it - no I don't believe in noble cause corruption or in guilty people being allowed to get off scot free on a technicality.

Do I think faking the silencer was fair - no
Do I think Jeremy is guilty - yes
Do I think he should gain his freedom if the silencer is ever proven to have been faked - no
Do I think it would be fair for him to have a retrial - yes.

i agree with all bar the last one caroline . i dont think he should be given a retrial this has gone on for long enough lets not forget the remaining members of the family.he was convicted and nothing new has come up to change that convictions our peers have refused him twice

[lookout]

 nothing new has come up to change that convictions our peers have refused him twice


             That's what you think !

[Caroline]

i agree with all bar the last one caroline . i dont think he should be given a retrial this has gone on for long enough lets not forget the remaining members of the family.he was convicted and nothing new has come up to change that convictions our peers have refused him twice

I don't think he would win Sami and it would be an end to all of this.

[sami]

nothing new has come up to change that convictions our peers have refused him twice


             That's what you think !

where is it and will it come out in my lifetime iam 49years old

[Caroline]

where is it and will it come out in my lifetime iam 49years old

I'm sure there wil be lots of little bits and pieces but nothing that will show Jeremy is innocent.

[sami]

I don't think he would win Sami and it would be an end to all of this.

good point a chance to finish it for good

[sami]

I'm sure there wil be lots of little bits and pieces but nothing that will show Jeremy is innocent.

what could it be caroline most of the evidence is gone and i cant think of anything jb could produce to get a retrial i think the supporters are just living in hope.but i cant see it

[mike tesko]

correct jane ps bews says it was a trick of light and no one was at the window

Let's get the facts right. PS Bews  was a member of the CA07 crew, who relayed the messages from inside the farmhouse by members of the raid team, stating at 7.37am, ' THE BODY OF ONE DEAD MALE, AND THE BODY OF ONE DEAD FEMALE, FOUND UPON ENTRY TO KITCHEN', followed by at 7.38am, 'ONE DEAD MALE, ONE DEAD FEMALE', and again at 8.10am, 'A FUTHER THREE BODIES FOUND UPSTAIRS, FIVE DEAD IN TOTAL'. Now, we have Bews talking nonsense about a supposed 'trick of light', when his colleague who was present at the time of the same sighting, described the sighting as involving an 'unidentified' male person. How come, PS Bews, PC Myall, or PS Saxby, have no recollection of receiving the aforementioned messages from inside the farmhouse at 7.37am, 7.38am, and 8.10am, regarding how the 'bodies of the five victims' were 'distributed downstairs and upstairs' at the close of play by 8.10am?

Selective recall, by dodgy dishonest cops...

What is Bews, Myall and Saxby going to say about these messages 'they' received and relayed from the scene to the control room back in Chelmsford? A 'trick of sound', or some other 'dishonest' explanation...

[mike tesko]

Why hasn't the 'publicity seeking' stink bomb Bews  given an explanation about the contents of these received and relayed messages from the scene to the control room, involving the 'declaration' that two bodies were downstairs, and the other three upstairs?

[lookout]

As JB says,it's hope that keeps his spirit alive. He's not doing all this research for nothing-------and neither are his team of barristers/lawyers/and various other members who are specifically trained in areas of which are seen as vital in investigating a very complex case.

[sami]

Let's get the facts right. PS Bews  was a member of the CA07 crew, who relayed the messages from inside the farmhouse by members of the raid team, stating at 7.37am, ' THE BODY OF ONE DEAD MALE, AND THE BODY OF ONE DEAD FEMALE, FOUND UPON ENTRY TO KITCHEN', followed by at 7.38am, 'ONE DEAD MALE, ONE DEAD FEMALE', and again at 8.10am, 'A FUTHER THREE BODIES FOUND UPSTAIRS, FIVE DEAD IN TOTAL'. Now, we have Bews talking nonsense about a supposed 'trick of light', when his colleague who was present at the time of the same sighting, described the sighting as involving an 'unidentified' male person. How come, PS Bews, PC Myall, or PS Saxby, have no recollection of receiving the aforementioned messages from inside the farmhouse at 7.37am, 7.38am, and 8.10am, regarding how the 'bodies of the five victims' were 'distributed downstairs and upstairs' at the close of play by 8.10am?

Selective recall, by dodgy dishonest cops...

What is Bews, Myall and Saxby going to say about these messages 'they' received and relayed from the scene to the control room back in Chelmsford? A 'trick of sound', or some other 'dishonest' explanation...

why didnt jb accuse them in court of lying about not seeing the figuer in the window.he made no mention of it in court why not.please explain

[mike tesko]

Why hasn't the 'publicity seeking' stink bomb Bews  given an explanation about the contents of these received and relayed messages from the scene to the control room, involving the 'declaration' that two bodies were downstairs, and the other three upstairs?

Bews  and the other two, passed the 'goddam' messages in question, why is Bews , and these other two, 'keeping their gobs shut' about messages they had involvement in receiving and relaying from one place to the other. Forget about the sighting of the 'unidentified' man, or the 'trick of light', for a moment, concentrate on what the occupants of CA07 did hear, did receive, and what they did relay from the scene to the control room. Why hasn't any of 'these blighters' made a witness statement giving details of these duties being carried out by them, and what it was they heard, what it was what they were told, and what it was what they told to the others in far away Chelmsford?

[Caroline]

why didnt jb accuse them in court of lying about not seeing the figuer in the window.he made no mention of it in court why not.please explain

Funny that!

[lookout]

There's a Hell of a lot that JB didn't say in court------------because he was taken by surprise over the whole fiasco of being accused. How was he supposed to remember what he didn't do,or knew nothing about anything ? I suggest that those who put him away were much the same as those here------without empathy,void of humanity and as thick as two short planks.