In a 'signed' witness statement made by DC Hammersley, dated, the 22nd October, 1985, on page 4, he states that on 'the 13th September, 1985 I caused the exhibit DRH/33 to be forwarded to the forensic Science Laboratory, at Huntingdon'...
But 'that was 'not true', because the driver who took it to the lab' (C. J HARVEY) took it the lab' on the 27th September, 1985. And, more to the point, when he arrived there with 'it', on 'that' date, A Detective Sergeant Lovell accepted 'it' (DRH/33) from him, as can be seen by the signatures, of both Harvey, and Lovell, that both originally dated their signatures with the date, 27th September, but the driver made an attempt to alter the date alongside his signature, into 13th September 1985, to match the fraudulent Laboratory stamp bearing the incorrect date, 13th September, 1985. DS Lovell, on the other hand, left the date alongside his signature (27th September, 1985), thus making a fundamental mistake exposing all parties as co-conspirators, including, DC Hammersley (soco), C. J. Harvey (the driver who took DRH/33 to the lab), as DS Lovell (the officer who accepted DRH/33 from C. J. Harvey, on 'that' (27th September, 1985) date...
It should also be pointed out, that this 'fraudulent' submission form, relating to 'hand swabs' which had already been previously rejected by the lab' on the 9th August, 1985, was created under the supervision, of DS 219, Davidson (soco). So here at long last, is 'clear evidence' that cops involved in the investigation 'tampered with the 'records' pertaining to the resubmission of the hand swabs. If these facts had been known about at the time of the trial, the hand swab evidence would have been thrown out, and almost certainly brought the trial to a halt for the reasons given...
