This is taken from Jeremy's own website, the Bonnet's log was withheld, how come they are talking about it being discussed by the prosecution? This is the 03:26 log, the one SUPPOSED to be from Nevill and it was made available to the jury. West read from his log in court - the jury were aware according to Jeremy's OWN website.
J's phone log contents were disclosed to the defence, the court, and the jury. It was the 'timing' of the call that was in issue during the trial, and the 'fact' that PC Wests time keeping was questionable, because in the phone log West wrote out the time of the call was recorded as 3.36am, but in one of his witness statements he stated that J's call occurred at 3.26am, that is what was being argued about during the trial, involving testimony from Malcolm Bonnet who told the court that at 3.26am he was contacted by PC West. The 3.36am log contents were disclosed, but not the 3.26am phone log contents which did not come to light until many years later...
What I believe happened was that before J called cop at Chelmsford, that West spoke to Bonnet about dads call at 3.26am. Then when J called at 3.36am, West contacted Bonnet again and told him that the son of Mr Bamber has contacted cm and passed a message, and upon learning of this Bonnet updated the earlier call from dad (3.26am) to that effect. That is why the contents of the 3.26am log are written up like they have been which included information passed to Malcolm Bonnet from dad, and his son. Please note that this same feature is not duplicated in the contents of PC Wests version of J's phone log (3.36am). The other thing you need to be aware of, is the fact that Malcolm Bonnet did not know that PC West kept his own phone log of J's call timed as having started at 3.36am. This became apparent during the trial, and but for the sly prosecution not disclosing the contents of dads log (3.26am), the cop and the civilian employee would have both been rumbled for trying to give damning evidence confirming that dad had called cops, just like the prosecution were alleging that dad would have done, if Sheila had got possession of 'the gun' and was going crazy. West and Bonnett got away with it during the trial by the skin of their teeth, helped by the sly prosecutor. I know exactly what went on, you mark my words.The prosecution couldn't afford to disclose the contents of 'both' phone logs, because the ruse that West and Bonnet pulled off relating to the purported 'timing' of J's call to West 'was' at 3.36am. West and Bonnett made it a confusing issue, and did so deliberately because prosecution needed an excuse for why the occupants of CA07 had been deployed to the scene (3.35am) before J's call to West at 3.36am, so, between them West and Bonnet sought to bring the time of J's call forward by 10 minutes. Imagine, all hell breaking loose in court if 'both' phone logs had been disclosed to all parties, and the shit hitting the fan, when the defence, the court in general, and the jury, discovered that the contents of each log were different to the other one. The first one, timed at 3.26am, (ladies and gentlemen of the jury) written as if spoken by dad, the second one, timed at 3.36am, written as if spoken by J. At that point 'the cat would have been out of the bag'. Defence counsel would have reminded the jury in his closing address, how the prosecution and its witnesses, in the form of PC West and Malcolm Bonnet, had set out to create a 'smokescreen' by suggesting that J had called PC West at 3.26am, not at 3.36am like PC West had first thought. However, the real reason for West and Bonnet trying to confuse everybody with these times, surounding J's call to PC West was 'because dad had called cops, himself' at 'that' time (3.26am), and I have no doubt in my mind that the jury would have bought into defence counsels argument to the effect that cops were trying to 'stitch J up for the murders, and that cops and the prosecution only stoop to such lowly despicable tactics when they have no other evidence to rely upon to convict the defendant...
