Author Topic: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim  (Read 68700 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #540 on: May 08, 2017, 11:38:AM »




It's clearly bothering you more than it is me. Why the impatience ??

Well I did first ask David in March 2017.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2017, 11:46:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #541 on: May 08, 2017, 11:54:AM »
Well I did first ask David in March 2017.

I recommend you ask Justice to ask his allusive wedding tipster. It's a mystery man that knows his stuff. A bit like Mikes "informant Z"  ::)

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #542 on: May 08, 2017, 11:58:AM »
I recommend you ask Justice to ask his allusive wedding tipster. It's a mystery man that knows his stuff. A bit like Mikes "informant Z"  ::)

Ask Justice to ask his wedding tipster what Bamber's lawyers said to you in you're meeting/s with them ?

I'm sorry I don't quite follow.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2017, 12:00:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #543 on: May 08, 2017, 12:10:PM »
Well I did first ask David in March 2017.





So ? Be patient and wait. It's not as though you're supporting the man and awaiting good news is it ?

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #544 on: May 08, 2017, 12:15:PM »
Ask Justice to ask his wedding tipster what Bamber's lawyers said to you in you're meeting/s with them ?

I'm sorry I don't quite follow.
You have got to give Walt time Adam, he has to go back to the drawing board each time his fantasies are rubbished, it must be a full time job making cartoons and I am glad to help and divert his fixation from certain posters.  (water of a ducks back springs to mind)

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #545 on: May 08, 2017, 12:17:PM »
I recommend you ask Justice to ask his allusive wedding tipster. It's a mystery man that knows his stuff. A bit like Mikes "informant Z"  ::)
Dont tell me Z wasn't real oh no, what is the world coming to

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #546 on: May 08, 2017, 12:21:PM »




So ? Be patient and wait. It's not as though you're supporting the man and awaiting good news is it ?

Always patient with David.

Been waiting 5 months for his latest 'Sheila scenario' & he wouldn't divulge his 'forensic evidence breakthrough'. Now I've been waiting two months for feedback from his meeting/s with Bamber's lawyers.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #547 on: May 08, 2017, 12:25:PM »
Always patient with David.

Been waiting 5 months for his latest 'Sheila scenario' & he wouldn't divulge his 'forensic evidence breakthrough'. Now I've been waiting two months for feedback from his meeting/s with Bamber's lawyers.





Well isn't there anything else you could be doing instead of waiting the months you're busy moaning about ? If you're that desperate,get to the source of the matter--------the CT legal team !

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #548 on: May 08, 2017, 01:41:PM »
Ask Justice to ask his wedding tipster what Bamber's lawyers said to you in you're meeting/s with them ?

I'm sorry I don't quite follow.

Well. After a short conversation with his wedding tipster. Justice was left in "No doubt whatsoever" that Bamber was guilty.  ::) Thou the details of this conversation has never been revealed.  ::)

There is no point wasting your time asking me. I'm just pointing you to a more reliable source of information.  ::)

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #549 on: May 08, 2017, 01:56:PM »
Well. After a short conversation with his wedding tipster. Justice was left in "No doubt whatsoever" that Bamber was guilty.  ::) Thou the details of this conversation has never been revealed.  ::)

There is no point wasting your time asking me. I'm just pointing you to a more reliable source of information.  ::)

I asked you because you claimed you met Bamber's legal team. After you sent them you're 'forensic evidence breakthrough'.

But as you said, asking you what was said in the alleged meeting/s is wasting time. 
« Last Edit: May 08, 2017, 01:58:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #550 on: May 08, 2017, 07:55:PM »
I can only conclude David didn't meet Bamber's lawyers.

I don't see why the lawyers would need to meet him when they already had his 'forensic evidence breakthrough' & can discuss it with Bamber or other experts. Or they can ignore the 'forensic evidence breakthough', which was just a palm print on the bible. 

David said he met the lawyers in reply 482 of the 'Letter Trail' thread, but didn't answer my question in reply 489. Or today.

« Last Edit: May 08, 2017, 08:10:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #551 on: May 08, 2017, 11:11:PM »
I can only conclude David didn't meet Bamber's lawyers.

I don't see why the lawyers would need to meet him when they already had his 'forensic evidence breakthrough' & can discuss it with Bamber or other experts. Or they can ignore the 'forensic evidence breakthough', which was just a palm print on the bible. 

David said he met the lawyers in reply 482 of the 'Letter Trail' thread, but didn't answer my question in reply 489. Or today.

Nice try Adam. But I will not be giving you any details.

If they already had my 'forensic evidence breakthrough'  Jeremy would not have asked me to go and show them. See the letter I posted a while ago.

Furthermore, If such meeting never took place, I would never have got this either. 
« Last Edit: May 09, 2017, 12:59:AM by David1819 »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #552 on: May 08, 2017, 11:24:PM »
Nice try Adam. But I will not be giving you any details.

If they already had my 'forensic evidence breakthrough'  Jeremy would not have asked me to go and show them. See the letter I posted a while ago.

Furthermore, If such meeting never took place, I would never have got this either.

Thanks for responding to my post after 3 hours. Not sure what you're picture is supposed to be saying.

Why didn't Bamber give you're 'forensic evidence breakthrough'/palm print to his lawyers himself ? You had already sent it to him.

And why the secrecy regarding what was said in you're meeting with Bamber's lawyers. After annoncing on here you had met them ? Don't tell me it's to 'prevent the crown from having more time to prepare'. Again.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2017, 11:26:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #553 on: May 08, 2017, 11:34:PM »
Thanks for responding to my post after 3 hours. Not sure what you're picture is supposed to be saying.


Your welcome. Better late than never.

Why didn't Bamber give you're 'forensic evidence breakthrough'/palm print to his lawyers himself ? You had already sent it to him.

I didn't/couldn't send it to him. I explained to him what it was via writing.

And why the secrecy regarding what was said in you're meeting with Bamber's lawyers. After annoncing on here you had met them ? Don't tell me it's to 'prevent the crown from having more time to prepare'. Again.

This has already been explained to you. See NGBs post and see AHs Email. 

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #554 on: May 08, 2017, 11:40:PM »
Your welcome. Better late than never.

I didn't/couldn't send it to him. I explained to him what it was via writing.

This has already been explained to you. See NGBs post and see AHs Email.

So what was Bamber thanking you for in his letter which you posted on here ?

Can't see a problem in you sending it straight to Bamber. You sent it to NGB & AH. Both of whom could have also passed it on.

Anyway it seems you met Bamber's legal team to hand deliver the documents yourself. Hope they bought you a coffee after you're efforts.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2017, 11:41:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.