Author Topic: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim  (Read 68578 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #495 on: April 11, 2016, 04:53:PM »
You have had various posters remind you of the evidence against Bamber in this case lookout ad nauseam yet you still drag out the same uninformed response.  When are you going to admit your mistake and accept that Bamber must be GUILTY?






Wrong. Various posters have skirted around my question just like you've done. 

guest154

  • Guest
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #496 on: April 11, 2016, 04:58:PM »





Wrong. Various posters have skirted around my question just like you've done.

If you still don't know what evidence convicted Bamber, go and read the 2002 rejection, there is a lot of information in there. But members have listed the evidence to you before now, John is correct. Not agreeing with the evidence is different than not knowing what the evidence is. Don't know how you, or anyone can say the evidence is wrong when they are constantly asking what the evidence is.

John

  • Guest
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #497 on: April 11, 2016, 05:08:PM »





Wrong. Various posters have skirted around my question just like you've done.

You have been told at great length what the evidence is, evidence which implicates Bamber by default because Sheila could never have done what is claimed and ended up in the way she did.

You're probably one of these folk who think Julie Mugford made it all up.   
« Last Edit: April 11, 2016, 05:18:PM by John »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #498 on: April 11, 2016, 05:13:PM »
Forensic ? Don't all shout at once.

John

  • Guest
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #499 on: April 11, 2016, 05:19:PM »
Forensic ? Don't all shout at once.

BULLETS
BLOOD
FINGER PRINTS
STAINING
SPATTER
GSR
AUTOPSY
« Last Edit: April 11, 2016, 08:56:PM by John »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #500 on: April 11, 2016, 09:23:PM »
BULLETS
BLOOD
FINGER PRINTS
STAINING
SPATTER
GSR
AUTOPSY






Where do they fit in with Jeremy ?

guest154

  • Guest
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #501 on: April 11, 2016, 09:29:PM »





Where do they fit in with Jeremy ?

They rule out Sheila. Who does that leave?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #502 on: April 11, 2016, 09:38:PM »
They rule out Sheila. Who does that leave?






They all involve Sheila,so get out of that one.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #503 on: April 11, 2016, 09:41:PM »
BULLETS
BLOOD
FINGER PRINTS
STAINING
SPATTER
GSR
AUTOPSY

You have personally on the phone said to me JB might not be guilty

True or false ?
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #504 on: April 11, 2016, 09:45:PM »
In the event that we are unlikely for any of Sheila's accomplices coming forward, we have to proceeded on the basis that Sheila played a significant role in the deaths, of the others...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #505 on: April 11, 2016, 09:50:PM »
The CPS know that Jeremy is innocent, but they are more concerned with trying to protect the image of Essex police...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

John

  • Guest
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #506 on: April 12, 2016, 05:24:AM »
You have personally on the phone said to me JB might not be guilty

True or false ?

He might not but he most likely is by all the evidence.  I still put it at 99% to 1%.

Cheers!
« Last Edit: April 12, 2016, 05:24:AM by John »

John

  • Guest
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #507 on: April 12, 2016, 05:25:AM »
The CPS know that Jeremy is innocent, but they are more concerned with trying to protect the image of Essex police...

You do post some rubbish, was that one of Ali Bongo's theories?   :o
« Last Edit: April 12, 2016, 05:26:AM by John »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #508 on: April 12, 2016, 08:59:AM »
He might not but he most likely is by all the evidence.  I still put it at 99% to 1%.

Cheers!






If we had the death penalty,you'd have to be 100% certain--------no " might be's ".
As it is,JB has got a " death sentence " because the verdict was " either/or " ! ( Sheila or Jeremy )

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #509 on: April 12, 2016, 10:16:AM »





If we had the death penalty,you'd have to be 100% certain--------no " might be's ".
As it is,JB has got a " death sentence " because the verdict was " either/or " ! ( Sheila or Jeremy )

Thank you Lookout
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill