David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim

[mike tesko]

' Daily Telegraph', 18th September, 1985, - ' the weapon involved was .22 automatic rifle '...

[mike tesko]

'Maldon & Burnham Standard', 19th September, 1985, ' mention of .22 rifle and it was reloaded during the shooting'...

[mike tesko]

' Evening Gazette', 19th September, 1985, - 'Five victims had been shot with Mr. Bambers .22 automatic rifle'...

[mike tesko]

' Evening Standard', 19th September, 1985, - 'Jeremy Bamber  told police house contained at least 10 guns'...

[mike tesko]

' Witham & Braintree Times', 19th September, 1985, -' Police initially thought Sheila had run amok with .22 automatic rifle'...

[mike tesko]

' Witham & Braintree Times', 26th September, 1985, ' Five victims had been shot with Mr. Bambers .22 automatic rifle'...

[mike tesko]

'Sun', 30th September, 1985, ' all 5 victims shot with Mr. Banners .22 automatic rifle'...

[John]

Sheila's body was here, there, and everywhere. The rifle was at the bedroom window, it was not at the bedroom window. The gun was on Sheila's body, it was not on Sheila's body. The gun was alongside Sheila's body, the gun was not alongside her body. The gun was resting between the bodies of June and Sheila on the bed, the gun was not resting between the bodies of June and Sheila on the bed. There is scientific evidence to prove Jeremy was the killer, there is no scientific evidence to prove Jeremy is the killer. All 25 bullets were fired from the same gun, all the bullets were not fired by the same gun. Sheila was alive when cops entered the farmhouse, Sheila was dead when cops entered the farmhouse. Her body was in the kitchen, her body was on the bed upstairs, her body was on the bedroom floor upstairs. Two bodies found downstairs, one body found downstairs. Three bodies found upstairs, four bodies found upstairs. First two bodies found were a murder, and a suicide first two bodies found were a murder and a murder. There was only one silencer, there were two silencers, Relatives only handed one silencer over to cops, relatives handed two silencers over to cops. Length of rifle with silencer fitted would have been too long, length of rifle with silencer attached would not have been too long. There was only ever one silencer held by cops during there investigation into these deaths, it had a variety of different exhibit references, SBJ/1, DB/1 and DRB/1, it had different lab' item numbers at different times, first it was item 22, then it was item 23, then it got reverted back to 22. There was a grey hair attached to the silencer, there wasn't a grey hair attached to the silencer, there was an elongated shiny scratch along the outer casing of the silencer, there was not an elongated scratch mark on the silencer. The silencer was coated in harmful superglue fumes, the silencer was not coated in harmful superglue fumes. Bullets fired through the silencer were being damaged, bullets fired through the same silencer were not being damaged, you can't believe anything which formed part of the prosecutions case, unless your from the guilty camp, then of course you might tend to believe anything ...

The evidence in the case is crystal clear, only you are attempting to muddy the waters.

[mike tesko]

There can be no doubt whatsoever, that Jeremy Bamber  has been framed for these murders. I have seen many examples of 'a fit up', in my life, as a serving prisoner and since. Without question, Banners is the worst example of them all, that I have witnessed. In most of the other cases which I am referring to, most of these cases were returned to a higher court, and the convictions quashed. What strikes me about the so called ' Bamber  case', is that the powers that be, simply do not want to entertain anything which in any other case would be sufficient to get a conviction quashed. Therefore, we have to conclude that the case of Jeremy Bamber has something about out, that the powers that be, are frightened of having to act upon it, through fear or a realisation that should Bambers convictions be quashed,  it will set into motion another million pound plkus, investigation into what went wring?

[Stephanie]

So is it the gunshot residue on the hands theory? Or am I wrong?

I was close 

[Caroline]

I was close 

It's related to that too.

[lookout]

The evidence in the case is crystal clear, only you are attempting to muddy the waters.

Remind me---------what evidence ?

[John]

Remind me---------what evidence ?

With a silly response like that, no wonder you still don't understand why Bamber is guilty.  Wishing him to be innocent just doesn't cut the mustard lookout.

[lookout]

With a silly response like that, no wonder you still don't understand why Bamber is guilty.  Wishing him to be innocent just doesn't cut the mustard lookout.

 Ah well I suppose a sillier answer from yourself equals the " silly response " from me.

[John]

Ah well I suppose a sillier answer from yourself equals the " silly response " from me.

You have had various posters remind you of the evidence against Bamber in this case lookout ad nauseam yet you still drag out the same uninformed response.  When are you going to admit your mistake and accept that Bamber must be GUILTY?