David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim

[guest7363]

I do think David is doing the right thing by not putting the information out there in the public domain, I agree entirely with that, I don't think Andrew Hunter would have been my choice of go-between though, But I bet he regrets putting this topic up stating that he has found something.

I think he just cannot wait to tell people and it got the better of him.  Good bloke though and credit for finding something if he has? I would have gone to NGB first like he did then put it to me and you lol

[maggie]

Maggie must say I do agree don't post for an hour I am off walking hahahahaha

[lookout]

I admire David for the work,time and thought that he has put into this latest " find " and I sincerely hope that it's the breakthrough that is so needed after all this time.
I doubt David cares who the " accused " is as his aim is to see fair play within the justice system so he's not emotionally attached in any way. It could happen to anyone ! Well done to him. 

[David1819]

It is just my personal view but there are a number of other members who appear to agree. You do appear to be attention seeking and trying to obtain recognition.

I am on a forum that has a handful of regular members and few guests visit not only that I also conceal my identity thus attention and recognition is not my agenda.

There is a place for those desperate for attention and recognition its called the X Factor 

You may have sought advice from Andrew Hunter, citing him as being older and wiser. Whilst he is certainly older, being 73 years old and having survived a major stroke in May 2014. I do however question his wisdom, to use your favourite accusation of being delusional, this is the man who in 2005 stood up in Parliament and preached that:

An apparent cut 'n' paste from the campaign team website of the time? Or maybe the chicken came first, unless it was the egg? 

Your saying Andrew gave me bad advice but I cant tell of your being honest or trying to get me to release the info. 

On a final note, and again as already mentioned, we will wait and see, but to the disappointment of some I am sure, I won't be holding my breath. 

I understand why you wont be holding your breath. However I am not the CT or Mike so give me a chance. If this amounts to nothing and then I make a second bold claim you will have every reason to ridicule and criticize me but until then this is a first.

[John]

I mentioned yesterday That one of the reasons I decided not go public with the findings is that if it turns out I am wrong I wouldn't want the campaign using it as propaganda. Of course I have considered I could be wrong. NGB can back me up on that one

What exactly are you trying to say David?  That Jeremy Bamber didn't shoot his family but had someone else do it for him?

[susan]

Ha ha hi Susan, Mat has a good sense of humour like me.  Must catch up sometime, have you got half a day spare lol.  Don't like secerets though Susie like David keeps ha ha

Hi Justice
I love a sense of humour.  Have missed our chats will pm you before this day is out I hate secrets but can't wait to be told what David has uncovered

[Stephanie]

I admire David for the work,time and thought that he has put into this latest " find " and I sincerely hope that it's the breakthrough that is so needed after all this time.
I doubt David cares who the " accused " is as his aim is to see fair play within the justice system so he's not emotionally attached in any way. It could happen to anyone ! Well done to him.

3 weeks is hardly a long time IMO. NGB has already given an indication that it is his belief, on its own it won't be enough. My opinion is it won't see the light of day.

Who said anything about a third party or are you speculating? And of course he's emotionally attached; his previous posts support this.

What could happen to anyone?  A miracle 

[lookout]

I didn't mention a third party !

[Stephanie]

I didn't mention a third party !

My mistake I misread your post.

[Stephanie]

Well the opposite has happened in that because there's a chance of JB's appeal happening,it's those who say guilty are the ones who are kicking off !!  WHY ??

Because guilty men lie over and over and over again.

[Neil]

What a horrible nasty thread and to think that those who see JB guilty not long ago said that the likes of myself would be hopping mad and still looking towards innocence if/when found guilty again.
 Well the opposite has happened in that because there's a chance of JB's appeal happening,it's those who say guilty are the ones who are kicking off !!  WHY ??

As it stands, it's all a lot of fuss about, quite literally, nothing!

[guest7363]

Jeremy Bamber tweeted: The #JeremyBamber Case: Appeal for New Information... Please RT @jbcampaignltd @FreeBamberNow @JBamberFacebook

Now's  your chance David, Jeremy's appealing for new information

[Stephanie]

As it stands, it's all a lot of fuss about, quite literally, nothing!

I would be interested to hear how David is approaching this, unless he's answered it and I've missed it!?

Does he think Bamber is;

Innocent

Guilty

and/or

looking at a technicality in law as opposed to either of the above?

[Stephanie]

I would be interested to hear how David is approaching this, unless he's answered it and I've missed it!?

Does he think Bamber is;

Innocent

Guilty

and/or

looking at a technicality in law as opposed to either of the above?

Again David has been inconsistent (this was in response to Scipio);

The Series of issues you put forward are constructed with innumerable guesses and speculations on your part. Your portraying a prosecuting version of events rather than solid unbiased facts.

I appreciate the effort you make but at the end of the day not you or anyone else can solve the White House Farm murders I realised that myself a while ago having thoroughly read about the case being swayed one way or another by flimsy circumstantial evidence and opinion I soon realised you would have to have been there that night to be certain of what happened.

I once was fairly sure of Jeremy's guilt until two lawyers told me on separate occasions that if he was on trial today he would be found not guilty. That got me thinking and the more I looked into things the more cracks and holes I found in the prosecution. At the end of the day only Jeremy knows. So if he is innocent there will always be guesses rumors and doubt. If he is guilty he is only one that can effectively solve the case by providing a detailed confession.

Are you attempting to impress the two lawyers you've referred to David?

There are often cracks and holes in prosecution cases btw David. You'll find this a common denominator in many cases; especially where the convicted is maintaining innocence. It goes with the territory.

You also appear to be familiar with psychological projection and confirmation bias David, I therefore ask again have you applied this to your own theories and indeed reasonings for doing what you are doing?

[JackiePreece]

I admire David for the work,time and thought that he has put into this latest " find " and I sincerely hope that it's the breakthrough that is so needed after all this time.
I doubt David cares who the " accused " is as his aim is to see fair play within the justice system so he's not emotionally attached in any way. It could happen to anyone ! Well done to him.

Excellent post Lookout, I totally agree