David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim

[Stephanie]

All we have to debate, is NGB's flowery assessment of your findings.

The way I interpreted it was; 

Looks like a good point, but would require conformation/further work by an expert.
Alone, it would probably not be enough to get the CCRC to have another look at the case.

Agreed Neil 

[sherlock]

I appreciate your support! 

I have had it officially confirmed to me by Essex Police (on the record) about 2 months ago that there is a current ongoing investigation into the Jeremy Bamber case ...

Maybe you should consider suggesting to Jeremy's legal team that they might hand over a copy of your report  to Essex Police (on a confidential basis) as soon as possible in case it assists them with their current investigation ...

[Stephanie]

Secondly My Dad recommended I take my findings to the press as I could get money for it

Do you think you may kick yourself in future and think you should have listened to your Dad David? 

[Stephanie]

I have had it officially confirmed to me by Essex Police (on the record) about 2 months ago that there is a current ongoing investigation into the Jeremy Bamber case ...

Maybe you should consider suggesting to Jeremy's legal team that they might hand over a copy of your report  to Essex Police (on a confidential basis) as soon as possible in case it assists them with their current investigation ...

Utter nonsense!!!

I only posted this the other day http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-35932802

[Adam]

I'm sure if you go through all of David's posts there will be a clue there somewhere Adam.

No thanks.

I don't believe it will go an

[Adam]

well we will just have to wait and see then.

Don't wait up.

[Neil]

I only made the discovery three weeks ago. Its not like I have held onto it for ages and said nothing

Your announcement seems to be premature.  It would be different if you were openly debating it here.  I totally understand why you're not, but why mention it all?

What did you think would be achieved, by prematurely alluding to these findings?

[sherlock]

Utter nonsense!!!

I only posted this the other day http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-35932802

Are you accusing me of lying ?

Please say if you are ...

Trust me there is a current ongoing Essex Police investigation into the Jeremy Bamber case ...

My Grandma always used to say to me "don't believe everything you read in the newspapers" ...

As i said in my post Essex Police confirmed to me ON THE RECORD that there is an ongoing current investigation ...

If anyone is really interested then you can always email the officer mentioned in the article and ask him if he really meant to say that the case will not be re opened - or if he has been slightly mis quoted - this is his email address :

[email protected]

So there you have it ...

[Neil]

I have had it officially confirmed to me by Essex Police (on the record) about 2 months ago that there is a current ongoing investigation into the Jeremy Bamber case ...

Maybe you should consider suggesting to Jeremy's legal team that they might hand over a copy of your report  to Essex Police (on a confidential basis) as soon as possible in case it assists them with their current investigation ...

That's interesting Sherlock.  Can you be any more specific?  Could it be that rather than looking into the crime itself, their investigations relate to other aspects, for example; a defamation claim?

[Stephanie]

Are you accusing me of lying ?

Please say if you are ...

Trust me there is a current ongoing Essex Police investigation into the Jeremy Bamber case ...

My Grandma always used to say to me "don't believe everything you read in the newspapers" ...

As i said in my post Essex Police confirmed to me ON THE RECORD that there is an ongoing current investigation ...

So there you have it ...

You tell me?!

I've just phoned Essex police and they denied your claims?

[Adam]

Your announcement seems to be premature.  It would be different if you were openly debating it here.  I totally understand why you're not, but why mention it all?

What did you think would be achieved, by prematurely alluding to these findings?

David knows he can't support Bamber by debating the released evidence. And he knows he can't make up new evidence on here. He will just get tarred as being another Mike or Lookout.

So he created a theory and annonced that he's sent it to Hunter. When that had no impact on here, he asked the least busy but most respected supporter on here to write a conservative post prasing his theory.

David will now be posting as a supporter on the grounds of invisible evidence. But still won't give his 'detailed' account of how Sheila committed the massacre.

[Adam]

Are you accusing me of lying ?

Please say if you are ...

Trust me there is a current ongoing Essex Police investigation into the Jeremy Bamber case ...

My Grandma always used to say to me "don't believe everything you read in the newspapers" ...

As i said in my post Essex Police confirmed to me ON THE RECORD that there is an ongoing current investigation ...

So there you have it ...

Have you got a source ?

Anyway there will always be an ongoing investigation. Bamber's always going on about it.

[Neil]

David knows he can't support Bamber by debating the released evidence. And he knows he can't make up new evidence on here. He will just get tarred as being another Mike or Lookout.

So he created a theory and annonced that he's sent it to Hunter. When that had no impact he asked the least busy but most respected supporter on here to write a conservative post prasing his theory.

David will now be posting as a supporter on the grounds of invisible evidence. But still won't give his 'detailed' account of how Sheila committed the massacre.

NGB is the "most respected supporter on here" for good reason.  He would never enter into such a dishonest plot. 

I think you're gonna have to face it Adam, David has it seems, at the very least, found a new point worthy of serious debate.

[Adam]

David did say he was going to stop posting his findings as authors may steal it for their books.

He then confidently gave an example of CAL stealing his idea of Bamber disabling all phones at WHF. Although Woffinden and me had already discussed this months and years before.

He has also refused to submit his 'detailed' account of how Sheila committed the massacre and refused to say how he has developed this current invisible theory.

So there won't be anything to negate the forensic evidence library.

[sherlock]

That's interesting Sherlock.  Can you be any more specific?  Could it be that rather than looking into the crime itself, their investigations relate to other aspects, for example; a defamation claim?

They were very careful with their words ...

All they said is :

"There is a current ongoing investigation into the Jeremy Bamber case" ...

I know nothing other than that ...

There are reasons why they told me this - they didn't do it or say it lightly - i am NOT going to go into those reasons other than to say that they told me on the record ...

Otherwise i would not be repeating what they told me ...