Author Topic: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim  (Read 68687 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #60 on: April 05, 2016, 10:57:PM »
She isn't goading Jackie - she is just showing herself up ...

Only an obsessed person could confuse me with Mike ...

I am more than happy to let other forum members reach their own conclusions as to her very obvious lack of reasoning abilities regarding her silly comment :)

Probably best you put  'it' on ignore
Just a minor irritant while we are interested in looking for the truth
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline sherlock

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1419
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #61 on: April 05, 2016, 11:01:PM »

If you want to be recognized as Mike, a word of advice. Stop using his phraseology. Stop using his grammar. Stop using his style. Stop using his punctuations......................or you could find yourself accused of being obsessed with him.

You are showing yourself up in public again Jane  ;)

It is obvious to all forum users just how bizzare your claim that i am Mike actually is ...

Still carry on if you want - it's no skin off my nose - and i actually find it amusing  ;D

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #62 on: April 05, 2016, 11:04:PM »
David is 100% correct to give this to the lawyers before putting it on an internet forum Adam ...

Surely you can see the reasons for that being the correct course of action ?

Maybe it wasn't Sheila or Jeremy Adam ...

One unexplained factor of this case is the 3 burn marks on Nevilles back ...

No one has an explanation for that - it is a mystery to every one ...

The most likely explanation is he was tortured / threatened to make that call ...

You yourself have pointed out that it is VERY strange that Neville must have waited some time for Jeremy to answer the phone and yet when Jeremy answered he only had time to say a very few words before the phone went dead - sort of fits with the torture theory don't you think ?

Like i have said before keep an open mind Adam ...

One of the very best lawyers in the UK once said to me that it is dangerous to assume anything ...

He said that for very good reason ...

There is a thread on the burn marks. And the Arizona tests which resulted in Bamber saying Neville's burn marks were from the rifle nozzle.

Is that why Neville's call to the police was not in the 2012 CCRC submission ? Because they had already released it as front page news in the Mirror two years earlier ? Guess they should have kept it secret.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2016, 11:08:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline sherlock

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1419
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #63 on: April 05, 2016, 11:05:PM »
Probably best you put  'it' on ignore
Just a minor irritant while we are interested in looking for the truth

I genuinely suspect that Jane's real agenda on this forum might be to cover the real truth ...

Maybe she knows more than she is prepared to say ...

I really mean that for very good reason ...

If you analysise Jane's posts you will see she is obsessed with protecting the people who ended up with all the loot ...

And i really do wonder why ...

Offline sherlock

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1419
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #64 on: April 05, 2016, 11:09:PM »
There is a thread on the burn marks. And the Arizona tests which resulted in Bamber saying Neville's burn marks were from the rifle nozzle.

Is that why Neville's call to the police was not in the 2012 CCRC submission ? Because they had already released it as front page news in the Mirror two years earlier ?

There are LOTS of threads and posts on this forum covering the burn marks ...

And i haven't seen one single post or idea relating to the burn marks that is anywhere near as likely as the torture scenario ...

In fact i cannot think of a single post that has even attempted to come up with a theory at all ...

Have you Adam ?
« Last Edit: April 05, 2016, 11:10:PM by sherlock »

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #65 on: April 05, 2016, 11:12:PM »
I genuinely suspect that Jane's real agenda on this forum might be to cover the real truth ...

Maybe she knows more than she is prepared to say ...

I really mean that for very good reason ...

If you analysise Jane's posts you will see she is obsessed with protecting the people who ended up with all the loot ...

And i really do wonder why ...




I have noticed that too Sherlock, it's become very obvious
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #66 on: April 05, 2016, 11:14:PM »
Blimey, why do you people all start frothing at the mouth?
Some of the posts in this thread are ridiculous.

Good for you David, if you have discovered something that may indicate that Jeremy may be innocent.

Obviously people will be sceptical, I certainly am, but this is much better than baking cakes or reading letters a grave sides.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #67 on: April 05, 2016, 11:17:PM »
There are LOTS of threads and posts on this forum covering the burn marks ...

And i haven't seen one single post or idea relating to the burn marks that is anywhere near as likely as the torture scenario ...

In fact i cannot think of a single post that has even attempted to come up with a theory at all ...

Have you Adam ?

I have it's in my thread.

Bamber took the silencer off to burn Neville's back with the rifle nozzle. To make sure there were no signs of life. 

Who agrees ? Bamber does.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline sherlock

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1419
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #68 on: April 05, 2016, 11:19:PM »
I have noticed that too Sherlock, it's become very obvious

And i bet we are far from the only 2 members / guests who have noticed it either ... ;)

But Hartley is right we should all stick to discussing David's excellent efforts in this thread ...

And we should all be following his example ...

ie analysing the facts logically and if possible scientifically and with an open mind ...

You have set a great example to us all David - well done !

« Last Edit: April 05, 2016, 11:21:PM by sherlock »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #69 on: April 05, 2016, 11:22:PM »
And i bet we are far from the only 2 members / guests who have noticed it either ... ;)

But Hartley is right we shall all stick to discussing David's excellent efforts in this thread ...

And we should all be following his example ...

ie analysing the facts logically and if possible scientifically and with an open mind ...

You have set a great example to us all David - well done !

Excellent efforts.

He hasn't posted has he. Although he has sent something off to Andrew Hunter. But won't say what.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2016, 11:25:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #70 on: April 05, 2016, 11:23:PM »
Who was supposed to have tortured Neville ?

The hit man or Sheila ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline sherlock

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1419
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #71 on: April 05, 2016, 11:27:PM »
I have it's in my thread.

Bamber took the silencer off to burn Neville's back with the rifle nozzle. To make sure there were no signs of life. 

Who agrees ? Bamber does.

So why didn't he test for signs of life with June or Sheila then ?

But let's save that for another thread Adam ...

What do you think about David's approach to trying to discover what happened ?

NGB has told us enough about David's methods for us to discuss it ...

So what do you think ?

Neil

  • Guest
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #72 on: April 05, 2016, 11:27:PM »
Blimey, why do you people all start frothing at the mouth?
Some of the posts in this thread are ridiculous.

Good for you David, if you have discovered something that may indicate that Jeremy may be innocent.

Obviously people will be sceptical, I certainly am, but this is much better than baking cakes or reading letters a grave sides.
Classy, as always.


Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #73 on: April 05, 2016, 11:28:PM »
David intially annonced he had sent something off to Andrew Hunter several days ago.

When that made no impact he went to NGB, seeking his approval on the forum. As a fellow supporter, this was done.

One problem, no one knows what this mysterious new evidence is.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim
« Reply #74 on: April 05, 2016, 11:30:PM »
So why didn't he test for signs of life with June or Sheila then ?

But let's save that for another thread Adam ...

What do you think about David's approach to trying to discover what happened ?

NGB has told us enough about David's methods for us to discuss it ...

So what do you think ?

How could Sheila burn her own back  ? She was supposed to have committed suicide.

He checked out Neville as he had put up a tremendous fight for life. So a good idea to make sure.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.