Latest Vlog _ Jeremy's Polygraph Test_2

[lookout]

Your thoughts are one things but you said you read something about lacerated indentations in Venezis's written report - we were discussing June and you said you weren't referring to June so who were you on about?

I was referring to June and also Neville,having read from what SHOULD have appeared at the Court of Appeal from Vanezis post-mortem ORIGINALS,but were OMITTED.

[Steve_uk]

Yes it's in the archives - it's been there for ages. Woodcock also stated that he thought Sheila looked too clean to have been involved in any struggle.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,4207.msg172557.html#msg172557

Yes and noted the two bullet holes. But I am surprised that he remarks about finger marks round her neck.

[Aunt Agatha]

I obviously can't answer that question, only she knows why she's doing what

She does appear confident in front of the camera. I was too overwhelmed and traumatised from having single handedly 'campaigned' and supported SH financially and emotionally on my own for all those years. I guess she's not emotionally invested in the same way I was.

I can't stand that word 'campaigner' I never saw myself as a 'campaigner.' I did what I did as I believed SH was innocent and that others were responsible. Of course with hindsight I realise now why I was left to 'campaign' single handedly. But that's a whole other story for another time...

I was treated like a pariah by some, and from my own experiences there's no 'celebrity factor' being linked to a convicted murderer maintaining innocence. I should add, I felt like this in the very beginning. There's nothing glamorous about visiting anyone in prison. It's a degrading experience and doesn't improve at any point, even in open prison conditions.

I concur. 100%

[guest154]

Where are you reading this from?

The last time Lookout mentioned all of this, Patti tried to help her remember where she had read it and help her find it. It turned out, the claim was apparently from Poppis blog - "apparently" Poppi claimed there were two COLP reports and that one was hidden - it contained Venizes "full findings"  But when you look at Poppis blog there is NOTHING at all like this on there.

It's all made up as Lookout goes along - and it changes (as it did in this topic) if it was the truth, the claim would be the same every time but each time it is pointed out why it can't be the wording changes.

[lookout]

Try reading the full interview !!

I DON'T make anything up.Why would I ??

[guest154]

Try reading the full interview !!

I DON'T make anything up.Why would I ??

I've read the whole thing numerous times Lookout. In the past you've also claimed AE said things in the COLP interviews - that are hidden in a secret second COLP report. If they are hidden how have YOU seen them? And if you have seen them why has no one else?

[lebaleb]

Yes it's in the archives - it's been there for ages. Woodcock also stated that he thought Sheila looked too clean to have been involved in any struggle.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,4207.msg172557.html#msg172557

I don't believe there was any struggle in the kitchen. There is no conclusive evidence for such an assertion.

[Steve_uk]

I don't believe there was any struggle in the kitchen. There is no conclusive evidence for such an assertion.

The ceiling light was broken for one thing. Quite apart from the bloodied fingerprints on the blue and white chequered worktop, blood on the floor and the scratches on the mantelpiece, which you can choose to believe or not.

[lookout]

I would have said that the blood on the worktops was where Neville had leaned at the phone when phoning the police as he seemingly wasn't hurt when he'd rang Jeremy.

[Caroline]

I would have said that the blood on the worktops was where Neville had leaned at the phone when phoning the police as he seemingly wasn't hurt when he'd rang Jeremy.

He didn't call the police.

[David1819]

I've read the whole thing numerous times Lookout. In the past you've also claimed AE said things in the COLP interviews - that are hidden in a secret second COLP report. If they are hidden how have YOU seen them? And if you have seen them why has no one else?

Have you read the whole thing or just what Mike has managed to upload?

I don't know about AE or lookouts claims but I know there are missing or 'secret' parts of the COLP report because you can find reference to those items in other documents, Like DI Cooks Audio interview. Whether its 'secret' or has been 'accidently lost' is down to you to guess for yourself.

[Steve_uk]

Have you read the whole thing or just what Mike has managed to upload?

I don't know about AE or lookouts claims but I know there are missing or 'secret' parts of the COLP report because you can find reference to those items in other documents, Like DI Cooks Audio interview. Whether its 'secret' or has been 'accidently lost' is down to you to guess for yourself.

I would like to know the significance of these things..

[lookout]

He didn't call the police.

Do you mind elaborating on that.

[Jane]

I would like to know the significance of these things..

...........and why it's automatically assumed there's something suspicious about it being missing. Do Jeremy's supporters believe that there's such stupidity at that level that they'd have left themselves exposed in such a way?

[Jane]

Do you mind elaborating on that.

Lookout, I believe I once asked you by what means did Nevill make the call to the police that you allege of him, and what sort of conversation might he have had with them that they may have subsequently chosen to ignore. Oh, and there's a hypothetical for you in this. What action might you have expected a living Nevill to take against a constable and civilian who took it upon themselves to disregard his call?