Latest Vlog _ Jeremy's Polygraph Test_2

[Jane]

Of course, he had to make it look easy.  The difficulty for him though was that the .22 rifle was problematic and was incapable of killing using one bullet even at point blank range, the bullets just don't have sufficient velocity. The killer had to fire multiple shots to put his victim down requiring reloading at least once.  None of this was in Bamber's plan.  His need to reload meant Nevill could get to the kitchen where the fight ensued, a fight which Sheila could never have participated in. 

The logic in this case is easy to see, the silencer issue is merely a distraction.

John, I never talk about firearm action because I understand LESS than nothing about it. The only thing I can contribute to what you've said, is that whilst the gun's inability to kill quickly was a problem for Jeremy, it wouldn't have been for a psychotic Sheila who would, presumably, just kept firing, and his aim was to make it look like psychotic Sheila had been responsible.

[Caroline]

I can see my sarcasm went straight over your head.

Sarcasm? Yeah right 

[lookout]

Of course, he had to make it look easy.  The difficulty for him though was that the .22 rifle was problematic and was incapable of killing using one bullet even at point blank range, the bullets just don't have sufficient velocity. The killer had to fire multiple shots to put his victim down requiring reloading at least once.  None of this was in Bamber's plan.  His need to reload meant Nevill could get to the kitchen where the fight ensued, a fight which Sheila could never have participated in. 

The logic in this case is easy to see, the silencer issue is merely a distraction.

Then what else besides the silencer is there ?

[Caroline]

Then what else besides the silencer is there ?

There is no point in anyone providing YET ANOTHER answer to this question because you don't take on board the answer.

[lookout]

There is no point in anyone providing YET ANOTHER answer to this question because you don't take on board the answer.

Because there is no answer beyond USING the silencer.

[Caroline]

Because there is no answer beyond USING the silencer.

I suggest yu do a search on the forum for every time you have asked that question but while you're looking, perhaps you can finally answer what evidence there is to prove Sheila resonsible. You haven't answered yet.

[lookout]

I suggest yu do a search on the forum for every time you have asked that question but while you're looking, perhaps you can finally answer what evidence there is to prove Sheila resonsible. You haven't answered yet.

I was about to ask you to do the same,but maybe you don't want to in case it throws up something you don't want to see. Then again,why should you when you're not interested ?

[Caroline]

I was about to ask you to do the same,but maybe you don't want to in case it throws up something you don't want to see. Then again,why should you when you're not interested ?

I can't count the number of times I have done your work for you - it's YOUR claim, you find it!

[lookout]

I can't count the number of times I have done your work for you - it's YOUR claim, you find it!

Poor you.I can understand why you've " missed " said information.

[Caroline]

Poor you.I can understand why you've " missed " said information.

You can't find it can you? 

[lookout]

You can't find it can you? 

It's on the other thread------just.

[lebaleb]

Sarcasm? Yeah right 

You shouldn't let being brown nosed by other members go to your head.
FYI it was blatantly obvious that Stephanie and Mrs Shipman were the same person as she admitted as much by her reply to me. My sarcastic reply was questioning the motive behind such duplicity. If you didn't get it no big deal, I can't help it that my subtle humour is wasted on you.

[John]

John, I never talk about firearm action because I understand LESS than nothing about it. The only thing I can contribute to what you've said, is that whilst the gun's inability to kill quickly was a problem for Jeremy, it wouldn't have been for a psychotic Sheila who would, presumably, just kept firing, and his aim was to make it look like psychotic Sheila had been responsible.

I have one major problem with that scenario though, a psychotic Sheila would have decorated the house with her bullets whereas the cold calculating callous killer could pick his shots.  Correction, had to pick his shots when he realised one or two would not floor an adult person unlike a rabbit.

[John]

Then what else besides the silencer is there ?

Oh dear lookout, I like you, I really do but your lack of understanding of all the evidence is appalling.  For the millionth time, Jeremy's guilt is derived from Sheila's innocence, it's as simple as that.

And for the benefit of any new reader who hasn't a clue, the evidence shows that only Jeremy or Sheila had the opportunity to murder the family, an outsider acting a lone without any help from Jeremy is a non starter.  In fact, had Jeremy set it all up for a third party he would have made bloody sure he had a bulletproof (sos) alibi!  Yet another factor which points to Jeremy being present when the dirty deeds were done.

Then there are the other acquaintances with very convenient bulletproof alibis. 

[Adam]

Lookout has posted on my forensic evidence library.

So has either forgotten all the forensic evidence, or is ignoring it.