Latest Vlog _ Jeremy's Polygraph Test_2

[guest2181]

The problem wasn't with showing the TV camera around the farmhouse,on the contrary it was when COLP started asking questions was when AE felt uncomfortable.

Says who? How would anybody know, let alone Jeremy? 

[Caroline]

So you're an expert on whether interviews are the truth or not ? Were you there ?

Are you now going to ignore what the papers say,unless of course it's slating JB ?

Hartley isn't referring to whether the interview is true or not, he's referring to what Jeremy told the interviewer.

[Caroline]

The problem wasn't with showing the TV camera around the farmhouse,on the contrary it was when COLP started asking questions was when AE felt uncomfortable.

You mentioned AE showing a TV crew around WHF as though there were something wrong in that. I fail to see what's wrong in her doing so?

[Jane]

I have read at the time that the category had been put to B that when the relatives got wind of it RWB wrote a stiff letter to EP telling them how " they've all been let down by the system,etc etc ",and a letter also found its way to the local MP at the time. Very soon after,JB went back to cat A.

C'mon Lookout. Be fair. If the person who you believed responsible for wiping out your entire family was in prison, would YOU want their status downgraded with moves which could lead to eventual release. Telling me Jeremy didn't murder anyone WON'T be the answer to my question.

[lookout]

C'mon Lookout. Be fair. If the person who you believed responsible for wiping out your entire family was in prison, would YOU want their status downgraded with moves which could lead to eventual release. Telling me Jeremy didn't murder anyone WON'T be the answer to my question.

I certainly wouldn't have been as quick to point a finger as everyone else seemingly was !

[Jane]

I certainly wouldn't have been as quick to point a finger as everyone else seemingly was !

Firstly, I believe that the key word in your sentence is "seemingly." You really have no idea of who said what to whom. Secondly, not being as quick to point a finger is remarkably generous from the woman who believes in a form of punishment from which there is no return.

[lookout]

Firstly, I believe that the key word in your sentence is "seemingly." You really have no idea of who said what to whom. Secondly, not being as quick to point a finger is remarkably generous from the woman who believes in a form of punishment from which there is no return.

Exactly !! One has to be DOUBLY sure whether it's a hanging situation or not.

[Jane]

Exactly !! One has to be DOUBLY sure whether it's a hanging situation or not.

So, how WOULD you feel if the person you were convinced was responsible for the slaughter of your entire family had his prison status reduced to a place where it could lead to potential release?

[lookout]

So, how WOULD you feel if the person you were convinced was responsible for the slaughter of your entire family had his prison status reduced to a place where it could lead to potential release?

But I'm NOT convinced. What sort of a question is that anyway ? Have you run out of options ??

[Jane]

But I'm NOT convinced. What sort of a question is that anyway ? Have you run out of options ??

And I think you're sliding out of giving a straight answer. The question was entirely reasonable. AE, convinced that Jeremy was responsible for wiping out her family, reacted to his downgrade in status, potentially paving the way to eventual release, exactly how I'd expect. Like most of us, she wouldn't want him walking the streets.

It's not a question of running out of options, Lookout, which is an irony on your part to even suggest given you don't believe in the guilty having them.

[guest154]

But Notsure. If you are so sure that you're correct, and everyone else is wrong. Please post something that backs up your opinion and the claim on the official site. We've posted plenty to back up that these are general assessments carried out yearly on every prisoners. Which is why Jeremy had 27 in 27 years inside.

Your only source is the official site and their claim. 

[lookout]

And I think you're sliding out of giving a straight answer. The question was entirely reasonable. AE, convinced that Jeremy was responsible for wiping out her family, reacted to his downgrade in status, potentially paving the way to eventual release, exactly how I'd expect. Like most of us, she wouldn't want him walking the streets.

It's not a question of running out of options, Lookout, which is an irony on your part to even suggest given you don't believe in the guilty having them.

 AE might be convinced that JB is a killer,but I'm not so therefore your questions don't pertain to me PERSONALLY.

[Jane]

 AE might be convinced that JB is a killer,but I'm not so therefore your questions don't pertain to me PERSONALLY.

NO, but the question that you're still not giving an answer to, DOES, so understandably, it seems like it's a case of it being different when the boot's on the other foot. My question was entirely up front and genuine. Leave Jeremy -and AE- out of the equation. If you were in the situation where you saw the person who you believed, beyond a shadow of doubt, had slaughtered 5 members of your family, being prepared for a change of prisoner status that could potentially lead to his release, how would you feel.

[Jane]

Because your question has a bearing on THIS case,I REFUSE to answer it !! 
 The trial verdict was NOT even beyond a shadow of doubt.

Thank-you, Lookout. THIS case could easily have been left out of the equation. It COULD have been entirely ignored. I believe your refusal to answer tells it's own story. I'll leave others to decide what the title might be.

[David1819]

You mentioned AE showing a TV crew around WHF as though there were something wrong in that. I fail to see what's wrong in her doing so?

Iv always found it rather creepy that she can live in there knowing what happened and she knew the people that died.