Latest Vlog _ Jeremy's Polygraph Test_2

[lookout]

But this often happens when there's an agenda involved, doesn't it, Lookout. Apparently, money is being asked for, for certain tests to be carried out. People aren't going to give money if they believe Jeremy is guilty. Not only MUST they make him look innocent, there must be "expert names" that that back them up.

" Backup " can work both ways Jane. Even you should realise that.

[Caroline]

OK, found the answer, it's in CAL's book. Egan was one of the psychologists that applied the PCL-R but the 27 assessments are just routine. the OS NEEDS to make this CLEAR!

[lookout]

 People will always believe the professors,top-cops, doctors,psychiatrists,etc etc,without stopping to think that they too can get things wrong.Nobody is infallible,no matter who they are.

[Jane]

" Backup " can work both ways Jane. Even you should realise that.

Yes, it can, lookout, but we don't have anything resting on the outcome of what we say.

[lookout]

Yes, it can, lookout, but we don't have anything resting on the outcome of what we say.

Unfortunately.

[Jane]

People will always believe the professors,top-cops, doctors,psychiatrists,etc etc,without stopping to think that they too can get things wrong.Nobody is infallible,no matter who they are.

I totally agree, which is why all of the above -and others- will disagree with each others' findings.

[Stephanie]

I'm NOT talking about SH !! Leave him out of this case,please. No two cases are alike ! You might think so but they're not,there's no connection whatsoever.

I disagree entirely. That is your opinion. This thread is about Bambers 'lie detector' test and Trudi's vlog with Terry Mullins. My posts have been relevant to the discussion and I have offered my experiences of how prisoners assessments are carried out annually.

Do you think Bambers yearly assessments have been created for Bamber and Bamber alone?

[Caroline]

People will always believe the professors,top-cops, doctors,psychiatrists,etc etc,without stopping to think that they too can get things wrong.Nobody is infallible,no matter who they are.

I agree, for every psychiatrist that says one thing there will be another with the opposite view. I think the PCL-R test is very much open to interpretation.

[lookout]

I agree, for every psychiatrist that says one thing there will be another with the opposite view. I think the PCL-R test is very much open to interpretation.

Any tests involving psychiatry/psychology are,in my estimation anyway.

[Stephanie]

I'm NOT talking about SH !! Leave him out of this case,please. No two cases are alike ! You might think so but they're not,there's no connection whatsoever.

There is indeed a connection imo but for some reason you are choosing to ignore it?

[Caroline]

I disagree entirely. That is your opinion. This thread is about Bambers 'lie detector' test and Trudi's vlog with Terry Mullins. My posts have been relevant to the discussion and I have offered my experiences of how prisoners assessments are carried out annually.

Do you think Bambers yearly assessments have been created for Bamber and Bamber alone?

The 27 assessments are 'ROUTINE' assessments conducted by the prison. They are not in depth psychological examinations carried out by independent experts ( source from CAL). Exactly what some of us have said ALL along.

[Stephanie]

OK, found the answer, it's in CAL's book. Egan was one of the psychologists that applied the PCL-R but the 27 assessments are just routine. the OS NEEDS to make this CLEAR!

Who tested Bamber pre trial?

[lookout]

There is indeed a connection imo but for some reason you are choosing to ignore it?

I'm not arguing with you Steph,but I see no connection whatsoever and that is why I'm ignoring it. End of.

[Stephanie]

I'm not arguing with you Steph,but I see no connection whatsoever and that is why I'm ignoring it. End of.

Then you are being subjective as opposed to objective.

[John]

Jeremy's only hope for parole could very well be if he confesses at some point and admits his part in the killings.