Author Topic: Susan Battersby  (Read 14986 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #45 on: February 20, 2016, 10:11:AM »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #46 on: February 20, 2016, 10:17:AM »
Something told me that " Daisy " was a man and in MY opinion it had connotations of the " sensationalist " similarity to the newspaper version of the PH debacle where " threats from Jeremy " were alleged to have been made from him within his prison cell to the author.
Just another Jeremy-bashing tactic.  So boring,so childish.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #47 on: February 20, 2016, 10:18:AM »
I either wasn't on the forum at the time or I didn't give it any attention, but this post from NGB seems to provide clarity.  :-\

She posted on the red forum because AA pointed her in that direction.  AA regards the red forum as a more sympathetic forum that this one, I believe because she thought the mods did not protect her from attacks by Jackie Preece.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #48 on: February 20, 2016, 10:21:AM »
Something told me that " Daisy " was a man and in MY opinion it had connotations of the " sensationalist " similarity to the newspaper version of the PH debacle where " threats from Jeremy " were alleged to have been made from him within his prison cell to the author.
Just another Jeremy-bashing tactic.  So boring,so childish.

Jackie was involved in that as well wasn't she Lookout?  ???

Seems to be a pattern.  ???

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #49 on: February 20, 2016, 10:26:AM »
No it has not been I asked NGB myself

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #50 on: February 20, 2016, 10:30:AM »
Jackie was involved in that as well wasn't she Lookout?  ???

Seems to be a pattern.  ???






I honestly didn't know that Hartley. Pattern ??

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #51 on: February 20, 2016, 10:35:AM »
No it has not been I asked NGB myself


Rather deceptive that, Jackie. It's a frequently used trick you employ. You ASKED Neil. You DIDN'T give his reply.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #52 on: February 20, 2016, 10:42:AM »





I honestly didn't know that Hartley. Pattern ??

It actually saddens me that, just because you think she's on your "side", you'd put your trust into such an untruthful and duplicitous person, yet you tell one of the most honest and straightforward people on this forum that you don't trust her.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #53 on: February 20, 2016, 10:43:AM »

I honestly didn't know that Hartley. Pattern ??

There was some strange conflict where Jackie had contacted PH and offered to provide him with a database of email addresses and contact details she had access to from her employers.

PH and NGB had some sort of an exchange, I don't think PH was particularly pleasent to NGB, then the newspaper article came out a short time later.

The common denominator however is Jackie.

If Ghandi and Jackie ever met, I'm convinced that Ghandi would later be arrested for GBH!  :o

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #54 on: February 20, 2016, 10:47:AM »
There was some strange conflict where Jackie had contacted PH and offered to provide him with a database of email addresses and contact details she had access to from her employers.

PH and NGB had some sort of an exchange, I don't the PH was particularly pleasent to NGB, then the newspaper article came out a short time later.

The common denominator however is Jackie.

If Ghandi and Jackie ever met, I'm convinced that Ghandi would later be arrested for GBH!  :o

H. If I recall, Jackie SWORE that it was PH who had contacted her first, but after reading her correspondence with him, it became perfectly clear, after examining the wording, that it was she who had made first contact.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #55 on: February 20, 2016, 10:53:AM »
H. If I recall, Jackie SWORE that it was PH who had contacted her first, but after reading her correspondence with him, it became perfectly clear, after examining the wording, that it was she who had made first contact.

Aaah yes, that's right, she tried to make out it was PH who had instigated the 'situation', but NGB posted her PM's and it showed Jackie to be lying.

Didn't her employers also give a message (must have been posted by NGB) that was somewhat scathing towards Jackies offer of providing email addresses and contact details?

It was all rather unsavoury, but with Jackie involved, what else would we expect?  ???

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #56 on: February 20, 2016, 10:59:AM »
Aaah yes, that's right, she tried to make out it was PH who had instigated the 'situation', but NGB posted her PM's and it showed Jackie to be lying.

Didn't her employers also give a message (must have been posted by NGB) that was somewhat scathing towards Jackies offer of providing email addresses and contact details?

It was all rather unsavoury, but with Jackie involved, what else would we expect?  ???

When anyone puts such store in talking about all those in high places who are known to them personally AND brags about the huge amounts of money they earns, one can expect nothing less than the unsavoury and vulgar.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #57 on: February 20, 2016, 11:08:AM »
And Daisy is who

A made up user name

What a load of rubbish and what a coincidence AA is involved

She does NOT exist

A user name Daisy exists
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #58 on: February 20, 2016, 11:13:AM »
I was reading a thread on the forum a few days ago, it was discussing traits of a psychopath.

A few posters were commenting about the fact that Jeremy appears to display many of the traits that were listed. At the time, I couldn't help but also associate many of the traits with our Jackie.

I wonder if she has ever been tested?  :-\


Very funny coming from Anne Eatons gopher

I bet your hanging onto your job by the skin of your teeth

How many times have you been banned from this forum for threatening behaviour or have you lost count
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Susan Battersby
« Reply #59 on: February 20, 2016, 11:17:AM »
Any way back to the topic of the thread if Jeremy had really told Mugford and then She had told Battersys Jeremy about the murders the deceitful pair would not be playing party games with Jeremy
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill