Author Topic: Sheila's Clean Hands  (Read 15563 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #60 on: January 14, 2016, 09:20:PM »
That's the court exhibit, the investigation reference is ND/3.

and it does say exhibit number 19

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #61 on: January 14, 2016, 09:21:PM »
it says nightdress on the paperwork .

Yes it is both 19 and ND/3. It's a Neil Davidson exhibit reference and a numerical court exhibit reference.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #62 on: January 14, 2016, 09:23:PM »
I didn't say she did wash her hands?  ??? ??? ???

I'm not arguing with you anymore. Let's just agree to disagree.  :)

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #63 on: January 14, 2016, 09:23:PM »
But her palms and fingers are free from blood when she is found right?

So we are told.

Then again in Vanezis original autopsy he writes that the palm print on the night dress came from her right hand.

When you have this much contradictory claims you really cannot be certain of anything
« Last Edit: January 14, 2016, 09:24:PM by david1819 »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #64 on: January 14, 2016, 09:24:PM »
I'm not arguing with you anymore. Let's just agree to disagree.  :)

I do agree that I disagree with you, there is no argument about that  ;) ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #65 on: January 14, 2016, 09:24:PM »
I do agree that I disagree with you, there is no argument about that  ;) ;D ;D

 ;D

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #66 on: January 14, 2016, 09:37:PM »
I don't think it is court exhibit as this is the document sending to lab

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #67 on: January 14, 2016, 09:44:PM »
I don't think it is court exhibit as this is the document sending to lab

Pretty sure it is.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #68 on: January 14, 2016, 09:47:PM »
Unless it's just a lab item reference.  :-\

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #69 on: January 14, 2016, 09:53:PM »
Anyway, it's the same item.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #70 on: January 14, 2016, 10:01:PM »
Unless it's just a lab item reference.  :-\

yes I agree lab reference - But I don't understand the analysis or which are blood groups .

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #71 on: January 14, 2016, 10:09:PM »
yes I agree lab reference - But I don't understand the analysis or which are blood groups .

KM just means it's human blood I think.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #72 on: January 14, 2016, 10:12:PM »
Kastle Meyer, test.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #73 on: January 14, 2016, 10:19:PM »
KM just means it's human blood I think.

KM test only determines blood

"Also, it is important to note that the test does not differentiate between heme molecules of different species. A separate test is required to determine whether blood is of human or animal origin."

http://chemistry.about.com/od/homeexperiments/a/Kastle-Meyer-Test-To-Detect-Blood.htm
« Last Edit: January 14, 2016, 10:20:PM by david1819 »

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's Clean Hands
« Reply #74 on: January 14, 2016, 10:21:PM »
KM test only determines blood

"Also, it is important to note that the test does not differentiate between heme molecules of different species. A separate test is required to determine whether blood is of human or animal origin."

http://chemistry.about.com/od/homeexperiments/a/Kastle-Meyer-Test-To-Detect-Blood.htm

Aaah okay.