A lot of debate is often based on the assumption that the only forensic evidence against Bamber is the silencer. Supporters, former supporters and undecided people often agree with each other on this. And debate accordingly.
The silencer is a big piece of evidence. And something that Bamber focused on in the 90's. Firstly disputing the blood results, before the inevitable accusation at the relatives. So it is not surprising that people have latched onto it.
As my threads have shown there are literally hundreds of pieces of forensic evidence which highlights Bamber's guilt. However I am constantly asked 'what forensic evidence is there ? At least seven times by one poster.
Rather than me keep having to copy and paste posts or more than one thread, a library can be created of the threads. This thread can be copied if necessary.
Today I 'll just copy the threads from the last two weeks. Although there will be other threads from before.
