Notusre, those are some VERY poor reasons to have doubt... I thought you knew more about the case than what the above post shows.
Police in conversation with someone inside the house
I guess that you don't care about the rest of that sentence? You know... the bit where they say "NO RESPONSE".
one dead male and one dead female upon entry
Clearly explained at the time. It was recorded wrong. If there were two dead bodies there, then there would have been blood left behind. Bodies bleed when shot, no evidence of anyone else in the kitchen other than Neville. June died in the bedroom, Sheila didn't move after being shot - so who is this mystery body?
non disclosure
Of what?
Just some of the reasons i have doubt
Police in conversation with someone inside the house
police used loudhailer then called for back up
one dead male and one dead female upon entry
sighting of someone in the window
non disclosure
statements re written
2 investigations
shielas diagnoses and history of mental illness
destruction of evidence by poluce both a few dwys after the incident and also many years later
peter suthersts expert evidence on photographs of paint
expert evidence on the moderator not being on the rifle
32 interviews with julie mugford
anne eaton lying
i could go on but i wanted to explain why i have so many doubts and for every point made against him regarding any of the above an expert can argue against it,
Just some of the reasons i have doubt
Police in conversation with someone inside the house
police used loudhailer then called for back up
one dead male and one dead female upon entry
sighting of someone in the window
non disclosure
statements re written
2 investigations
shielas diagnoses and history of mental illness
destruction of evidence by poluce both a few dwys after the incident and also many years later
peter suthersts expert evidence on photographs of paint
expert evidence on the moderator not being on the rifle
32 interviews with julie mugford
anne eaton lying
i could go on but i wanted to explain why i have so many doubts and for every point made against him regarding any of the above an expert can argue against it,
peter suthersts expert evidence on photographs of paint
His rejected claims?
As for the rest such as "Ann lying" and 32 interviews with JM, not really worth answering really as
1. You're not clear on what Ann is supposed to have lied about & she has never been shown as a liar, so it's a bit general.
2. What are you basing 32 interviews with JM as being a high number against? Compared to what?
