Thats okay, I'm not arguing. 
------------------------------
I've very recently discovered other police records which make a mockery of the silencer evidence, that was used to convict Jeremy of these murders - now, before you start going off the handle, it becomes quite clear that there were more than one silencer in the possession of the police, at one time or another, and that these different silencers, must all have had different exhibit references. Now, I know what you said in one of your earlier posts is something which the police put forward as a possible explanation for why the sole silencer had three different exhibit references, SBJ/1, DB/1 and DRB/1, and I do not suggest that this is your explanation even though you appear to agree with it, but ask yourself this honest question, if there was only one silencer, and it had all these different exhibit references, what exhibit references were given to the Boutflour silencers that landed in police possession?
Lets get the facts right so that everybody can see what we are talking about, there were three other silencers belonging to relatives that lay at the heart of this investigation, in addition to the Bamber one (DRB/1):-
(1) Anthony Pargeter had a Parker hale silencer that was normally kept in the downstairs toilet / bathroom at whf - what exhibit reference was given to this silencer?
(2) David Boutflour had a Parker Hale silencer that police took custody / possession of, and later handed back to him after Jeremy was convicted of the murders- what exhibit reference was given to this silencer?
(3) Robert Boutflour had a Parker Hale silencer that police took custody / possession of, and later handed back to him after Jeremy was convicted of the murders - what exhibit reference was given to this silencer?
