Author Topic: Anglolawyer's theory  (Read 20448 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #225 on: November 09, 2015, 07:07:PM »
Sorry Notsure, I don't understand your thinking at all.

thats alright i dont understand it much either!

i dont believe jms version of the phone call to her and it makes me wonder if she was in on it thats my guilty stance , however, if im in innocent mode i can appreciate why he didnt call 999 as im not sure i would have done. I might have called jm to ask her what she thought i should do/do you think i should call 999 or just tge local bobby.

If hes guilty she knew a lot more than shes told us but what i dont understand is why he wouldnt have dobbed her in. Why should she get away with it, thats what i would think. Does my thinking becomd any clearer caroline? 




Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #226 on: November 09, 2015, 07:10:PM »
thats alright i dont understand it much either!

i dont believe jms version of the phone call to her and it makes me wonder if she was in on it thats my guilty stance , however, if im in innocent mode i can appreciate why he didnt call 999 as im not sure i would have done. I might have called jm to ask her what she thought i should do/do you think i should call 999 or just tge local bobby.

If hes guilty she knew a lot more than shes told us but what i dont understand is why he wouldnt have dobbed her in. Why should she get away with it, thats what i would think. Does my thinking becomd any clearer caroline?

He can't drop her in it without admitting guilt. Try to think.

If he had been planning the crime for months, why would he telephone Julie to ask her what to do ?
« Last Edit: November 09, 2015, 07:11:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #227 on: November 09, 2015, 07:13:PM »
Telephoning the forth furthest away police station was a calculated move.

In a panic, you don't do that.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #228 on: November 09, 2015, 07:15:PM »
Adam, excuse me i do think thank you, its your inability to see where i am coming from.

if he knew there was a mountain of evidence against him his lawyers would have told him that it was likely he would be found guilty and advised him to plead guilty in which case he would have told police about her involvment for a lighter sentende. Just to say im innocent wasnt going to work if they had thst much evidence against him and he would have known that.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #229 on: November 09, 2015, 07:24:PM »
thats alright i dont understand it much either!

i dont believe jms version of the phone call to her and it makes me wonder if she was in on it thats my guilty stance , however, if im in innocent mode i can appreciate why he didnt call 999 as im not sure i would have done. I might have called jm to ask her what she thought i should do/do you think i should call 999 or just tge local bobby.

If hes guilty she knew a lot more than shes told us but what i dont understand is why he wouldnt have dobbed her in. Why should she get away with it, thats what i would think. Does my thinking becomd any clearer caroline?

I don't believe her version either but the last thing I would have done if I thought my dad/family were in danger, was call someone else. However, Jeremy denies calling Julie first, he said he called her after - so why would he? It can't have been for advice on what to do because according to him, he called the police first and why didn't her tell her he'd called the police?

He wouldn't dob her in because then he would have to admit to being guilty!!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #230 on: November 09, 2015, 07:32:PM »
To be fair caroline he did say he was confused about the sequence of the phone calls which is understandable after reading the police interview. I was confused after all that questioning.!

i think he must have said something other than theres something wrong at the farm, it doesnt make any sense.

i dont know what to beieve, i would loveto see the trial transcripts wouldnt you?




Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #231 on: November 09, 2015, 07:39:PM »
To be fair caroline he did say he was confused about the sequence of the phone calls which is understandable after reading the police interview. I was confused after all that questioning.!

i think he must have said something other than theres something wrong at the farm, it doesnt make any sense.

i dont know what to beieve, i would loveto see the trial transcripts wouldnt you?

What do think Sheila was doing when Neville phoned Jeremy ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #232 on: November 09, 2015, 07:44:PM »
Adam, excuse me i do think thank you, its your inability to see where i am coming from.

if he knew there was a mountain of evidence against him his lawyers would have told him that it was likely he would be found guilty and advised him to plead guilty in which case he would have told police about her involvment for a lighter sentende. Just to say im innocent wasnt going to work if they had thst much evidence against him and he would have known that.
He couldn't plead guilty without forfeiting the inheritance.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #233 on: November 09, 2015, 08:06:PM »
To be fair caroline he did say he was confused about the sequence of the phone calls which is understandable after reading the police interview. I was confused after all that questioning.!

i think he must have said something other than theres something wrong at the farm, it doesnt make any sense.

i dont know what to beieve, i would loveto see the trial transcripts wouldnt you?

He wouldn't have been confused had he just told the truth and didn't try to remember which lie he told first.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #234 on: November 09, 2015, 08:17:PM »
have you ever been interviewed by the police it can get confusing.

especally if there asking the same qustions over and over agian.

of trying to catch you or through you of balance as they used to do.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2015, 08:19:PM by nugnug »

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #235 on: November 09, 2015, 08:28:PM »
have you ever been interviewed by the police it can get confusing.

especally if there asking the same qustions over and over agian.

of trying to catch you or through you of balance as they used to do.
I thought Jeremy coped well with the constant questioning,but at that stage the Police had very little to incriminate him.  They were obviously hoping he would break down and confess. Whether he telephoned Julie before or after he called the Police was not so important in the scheme of things.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #236 on: November 09, 2015, 08:50:PM »
have you ever been interviewed by the police it can get confusing.

especally if there asking the same qustions over and over agian.

of trying to catch you or through you of balance as they used to do.

The truth is the truth - it can get confusing if you lie and no, I haven't been interviewed by the police. Liars get caught out - simple!
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #237 on: November 09, 2015, 08:58:PM »
The truth is the truth - it can get confusing if you lie and no, I haven't been interviewed by the police. Liars get caught out - simple!

The same question over and over should be easy if you're telling the truth. You just keep repeating the same answer, the truth!  ;D

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #238 on: November 09, 2015, 09:09:PM »
two points - as the calls were supposed to be his planned alibi then he would have made very sure he had got his sequence and timings correct so as not to give cause for suspicion. Secondly when he found out his family were all dead then perhaps he did feel guilty about calling Julie before the police (if he did) and hesitated about his answers .Because after all if he is innocent his delays could have contributed to their deaths - athough even if the police had got their earlier its obvious they would not have gone in

The police are the ones who should have got EVERY timing correct as they were trained to do so and had clocks in front of them.


Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #239 on: November 09, 2015, 09:18:PM »
two points - as the calls were supposed to be his planned alibi then he would have made very sure he had got his sequence and timings correct so as not to give cause for suspicion. Secondly when he found out his family were all dead then perhaps he did feel guilty about calling Julie before the police (if he did) and hesitated about his answers .Because after all if he is innocent his delays could have contributed to their deaths - athough even if the police had got their earlier its obvious they would not have gone in

The police are the ones who should have got EVERY timing correct as they were trained to do so and had clocks in front of them.

I don't agree at all - you seem to be expecting him to have committed the perfect crime. He obviousy never thought he would be s suspect because he told Julie he'd thought of everything - that's clearly not the case because he didn't pay attention to detail such as times etc. He make mistakes that's why he got caught.

The police aren't trained not to make mistakes, they are human at the end of the day and we don't know that Jeremy didn't have a clock in front of him. He probably had a watch on given that he didn't go to bed.
Few people have the imagination for reality