Author Topic: Anglolawyer's theory  (Read 20412 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #150 on: November 06, 2015, 08:40:PM »
Taff Jones didn't believe her but DS Jones felt she was telling the truth ever since he listened at the door and heard Jeremy chuckle.






Pity DS Jones hadn't heard a confession instead then there'd have been no need for the lies that rolled off everyone's tongues after that.
I don't believe he heard a chuckle at all.What he probably heard was a choked cry more like it,but a chuckle sounded better under the circumstances.
God,how I loathe people like that.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #151 on: November 06, 2015, 08:42:PM »
She lay in bed after that call unable to resume slumber and rationalized he had just told her that he had murdered his family.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #152 on: November 06, 2015, 08:44:PM »
If you believe that you'll believe anything-----------------silly me,you do anyway. ::)

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #153 on: November 06, 2015, 08:46:PM »
If you believe that you'll believe anything-----------------silly me,you do anyway. ::)

It would help if you would quote the response you are addressing...
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #154 on: November 06, 2015, 08:51:PM »
It would help if you would quote the response you are addressing...






Yours of course.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #155 on: November 06, 2015, 08:54:PM »
What you choose to believe means little.

You can choose to believe she was lying when she said she thought he was just blowing off steam and not serious about killing them to your heart's content.  What matters is what can be proven not what you choose to believe.

No one can prove that she knew he was serious.

Similarly choosing to believe that she knew he was going to make up a phone call from Nevill and told her to help him falsely support receiving such call means little.  Proving it matters and there is no evidence to prove it.

If Julie had been actively involved then she would have no reason to try to help get Jeremy caught because if he was caught he could end up rolling over on her.  The whole reason she didn't mind telling the truth was because they broke up so him going to jail would not end up with them being apart they already were apart and him going to jail would not run the risk of him implicating her in anything serious.


Hmm, I'm fully aware that proof is required for every point, but I'm not prepared to dismiss a point as being unimportant/not having happened because proof doesn't exist. It wouldn't have been necessary for him to go into minute detail, nor do I think he'd have needed to tell her to falsely support him. He'd have known she would because he'd have been aware of her agenda, ie. MARRIAGE.....................all of which can undoubtedly be dismissed in court. No proof. But nothing just happens out of thin air.



 

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #156 on: November 06, 2015, 08:59:PM »
What spoony love was this that had engendered such a state of affairs, what confabulations was she to experience henceforth, almost unable to believe that she had fallen in love with this monster,who had slain five as if he were disembarrassing himself of vermin in the granary;how to proceed with the knowledge that she was complicit morally if not in law, compelled to bear witness as she advanced to the mortuary to identify the results of her boyfriend's nocturnal escapade.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2015, 09:00:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #157 on: November 06, 2015, 09:02:PM »
An officers report re. the shooting in the kitchen ? Where is it ? Apart from it being written in log no.1612. What shooting in the kitchen ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #158 on: November 06, 2015, 09:04:PM »
What spoony love was this that had engendered such a state of affairs, what confabulations was she to experience henceforth, almost unable to believe that she had fallen in love with this monster,who had slain five as if he were disembarrassing himself of vermin in the granary;how to proceed with the knowledge that she was complicit morally if not in law, compelled to bear witness as she advanced to the mortuary to identify the results of her boyfriend's nocturnal escapade.


LUST?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13787
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #159 on: November 06, 2015, 09:06:PM »
If Julie was involved, I wonder if her current employer or the kids at the School she teaches know who she is.



Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #160 on: November 06, 2015, 09:12:PM »
Her own children will be old enough to know.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #161 on: November 06, 2015, 09:16:PM »
Julie wasn't altogether truthful in her testimony but she won't say anything about it despite a request.
I suppose silence is golden.

At this point in her life, I really don't blame her. 30 years ago there was a trial in which the media dubbed her a "star witness." Her testimony was instrumental in getting someone convicted but hers wasn't the ONLY testimony. If you, like Mike, believe that Uncle TC et al -some 30ish in total so far- were liars, WHY pick out this one person who SHOULD(?) in your opinion, put herself out and potentially ruin not just her own life, but that of her innocent husband and children, and those of her family living here?
« Last Edit: November 06, 2015, 09:34:PM by Jane J »

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #162 on: November 06, 2015, 09:18:PM »
Her own children will be old enough to know.


So that makes it all right, does it? Is there some sort of cut off point at which it doesn't matter?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #163 on: November 06, 2015, 09:30:PM »
If Julie was involved, I wonder if her current employer or the kids at the School she teaches know who she is.
She was placed in an invidious position at the London primary school,where political correctness ruled courtesy of the Inner London Education Authority. She lasted two further years,having been moved to a different school before deciding wisely in my opinion to move on from where she was not really wanted and resolved to take a trip abroad,whereupon she met her husband-to-be. After all life's tribulations she was determined to make a success of her marriage,which she juggled with career and child-caring responsibilities along with her extensive charity work as she formed contacts and climbed the greasy pole of success, of which it would have been churlish to divest this individual,who made amends for past misdeeds,though of course no solace whatsoever for Colin,also left to start again with what god-given creative talents he possessed,yet possibly not as independent as Julie as he picked up the remnants of his broken life.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2015, 09:31:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Anglolawyer's theory
« Reply #164 on: November 06, 2015, 09:36:PM »
An officers report re. the shooting in the kitchen ? Where is it ? Apart from it being written in log no.1612. What shooting in the kitchen ?

The shooting of Nevill in the kitchen.  This is something else Mike long has lied about.  For years Mike was lying claiming this report is hidden by PII. Harters even had a heated debate with him where Harters said he didn't believe Mike had the other action reports but not this one.

Mike claimed it was hidden and pertains to police shooting victims in the kitchen.  It turns out Mike had it all along and inadvertently revealed such when he posted a snapshot of part of the report.  It pertains to Nevill being shot in the kitchen.  The only page he posted though was this:

 
« Last Edit: November 06, 2015, 10:13:PM by scipio_usmc »
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry