Author Topic: Mystery of the presence of human blood both ends of the silencer, 13th August...  (Read 53767 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
As already pointed out, the three main photographic albums ('SENIOR INVESTIGATING OFFICERS ALBUM', and 'MASTER COPY ALBUM', and the 'COURT ALBUM') were all created in sequential order, 1 to 581, 1 to 223, and 1 to 50, in sequential order, so it should have been a piece of cake trying to reconstruct each album in turn, starting with the 50 belonging to the 'COURT ALBUM', backwards in sequential order against the 223 photographs in 'THE MASTER COPY ALBUM', backwards in sequential order against the 581 photographs in 'THE SENIOR INVESTIGATING OFFICERS ALBUM'. But a full schedule of the latter album has never yet been provided. Additionally, when I started to back check the sequential order of the 50 'COURT ALBUM' photographs, against the 223 photographs in sequential order, I found that all the 223 photographs were not listed in sequential order, but mixed up...

This alerted me to the fact that the 223 photographs of the ' MASTER COPY ALBUM' were not all of the photographs that had been taken in connection with this investigation, there had it seems been some editing going on, or in other words photographs taken out of circulation.. It took me quite to some time to find out that in fact a total of 358 photographs had been removed for the purpose of trying to keep the lid on Essex police's big secret, that they and not Jeremy, or anybody else had staged the crime scene to make out the case that Sheila had taken her own life...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I now know why the original photographic record was severely edited, and the purpose behind DI Ron Cook, and PC David Bird, both claiming at the trial in 1986 that photograph No. 23 (Court Album) had been taken after the photographs showing the rifle on Sheila Caffells body, as per photograph No. 25, No. 26, No. 28, No. 30, No. 31, and No. 32, etc, had been taken by PC Bird, when in actual fact, Photograph No. 23 (Court Album) had been taken beforehand. The simple truth was that 'the' rifle was brought from its position against the bedroom window, and positioned on the body, not the other way around. The police went to a great deal of trouble to try and edit out all or any photograph which might expose the deception but overlooked the importance of photograph No. 23 (Court Album), which has undone them...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Jeremy Bamber did not shoot his sister dead, or stage manage her body as was claimed during his trial...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
When you stop to think about this the relatives didn't half take the heat off EP. A clever but crafty move on the part of EP that the relatives wouldn't have been any the wiser.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
When you stop to think about this the relatives didn't half take the heat off EP. A clever but crafty move on the part of EP that the relatives wouldn't have been any the wiser.

That is precsely what appears to have happened, EP showed no interest in involving anyone else in the shootings, the wanted the matter dealt with through the Coroner's Court system. The pressure imposed by relatives upon the police was resisted initially...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Since we now know that the rifle was photographed resting against the bedroom window (photo' No. 23), before 'it' was photographed on Sheila Caffells body (photo No.' 26 to 32 consecutively), the following exert from Ron Cooks sworn trial transcript becomes relevant:-

Q - At that stage, did you and Mr Bird confer together, and did Mr Bird commence taking photographs? A - Yes, I gave Mr Bird a rough outline of the scene as I had shown to Detective Inspector Jones, and I asked him to start taking a series of photographs before any further examination of the premises took place. Q - to your knowledge, at that stage had the gun, resting on Sheila Caffells, been examined to see whether it was still loaded? A - The gun on Sheila Caffells, when I entered the bedroom, was as it was as it was when it was photographed by Detective Constable Bird before anything - further examination took place. Q - was it examined in your presence to see whether it was loaded or not? A - it was, Sir. Q - by whom? A - it was, I recall, on arrival at the scene and I believe Inspector Montgomery was also at the scene, as were other uniform officers, and one of the main concerns for our safety was whether the gun was still loaded, and I believe I informed him that when I got around to this particular part of the examination, before anything is moved, I would notify him to carry out a safety check on the weapon before it was moved...

MR JUSTICE DRAKE - You went off to begin with, and was a photograph taken before anyone, to your knowledge, touched the gun? A - when I arrived at the scene, I was a pair with Detective Inspector Jones, and in accordance with the normal police instructions in these circumstances, I became in charge of recording that scene before anything was moved or touched, so as to preserve the integrity of it for the information of any subsequent court....

MR MUNDAY - That was your responsibility. A - initially, Sir, yes. Q - it did not matter that others were other officers of superior rank there, you were acting in charge of that scene? A - could I clarify that before I answer? Although I was in charge of the scene, I would have been working under the directive of a senior officer and in this particular case it would have been Detective Inspector Jones, who unfortunately is not with us, but this was the position. Q - if one looks, for instance, at the bundle of photographs -- which I would ask you to look at -- particularly photographs 26 to 31, please -- behind the green divider -- the first one --- A - 26? Q -- and 31. A - 31. Q - does either of those photographs differ from the scene that you saw when you first arrived? A - No, Sir, no Sir. Q - I want you to look at photographs 29 and 30, please. It would appear that the hand and arm have been moved. Who was responsible for that? A - I was, Sir. Q - for what purpose,? A - to demonstrate the blood marks which were not readily visible under the wrist. When we began the initial examination of the body, there was obviously something underneath the wrist. I just moved it to one side and photographed that before any further examination took place. Q - when that photograph was taken, had the gun been examined to see whether it was still loaded? A - no, Sir. Q - it had not? A - no, Sir. Q - turn to photograph 23 if you would, again in the same bundle. We can see in photograph 23 what appears to be a gun leaning against the window frame. What gun is that? A - it is a rifle which we have just looked at in the previous photographs. Q - can you explain how it got there? A - when we commenced work, I instructed Detective Constable Bird to commence taking a series of photographs. Again, this is normal procedure. Before anything was moved in the main bedroom, I asked him to photograph it first, and then to continue to photograph the remaining parts of the house. This photograph would have been taken after he had taken his original photographs of the main bedroom. Q - who moved the gun to that position? Do you know? A - I did. Q - would that be before or after it had been checked by a firearms officer? A - it was checked as we removed it from the body and then stood there, having been given a safety check...
« Last Edit: November 21, 2015, 01:04:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Cook lied whilst testifying about these matters, since photograph 23 which shows the gun leaning against the bedroom window frame, was taken before the same gun was photographed on Sheila's body, not the other way round like Cook testified about. Ron Cook committed perjury, and in so doing, has 'perverted the course of justice'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The crime scene was set up by the police, not by Jeremy Bamber, or any as yet unidentified murderer...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
As a result of it now having been established that police staged the crime scene involving the death of Sheila Caffells, the convictions are no longer tenable and must be quashed as a matter of legal principle, and in the interest of justice'...

In this case, scenes of crime officers staged the crime scene and then set about photographing the scene as though they had been dealing with a case of 4 murders, and a suicide, destined to be dealt with in the Coroner's court system, not the criminal court...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The jury would have been influenced by the bundle of crime scene photographs depicting the rifle laid on Sheila Caffells body, and the testimony of both Detective Inspector Ron Cook, and Police Constable David Bird, stating that the body of Sheila had been photographed exactly as it had been originally found, untouched and unmoved. When you have a police officer testifying to that effect in the presence of the jury, and the jury have been provided with the photographs of the rifle being grasped on the victims body, and the prosecution are drilling it into the minds of the jury, that the body and the gun upon it is evidence that Jeremy Bamber killed his sister and set the scene the make it appear like his sister had shot the others, before having turned the gun upon herself - yet, all along it had been the police themselves, who had set the scene with the rifle from the bedroom window onto Sheila's body so they could photograph her body as though she had killed herself. At trial, the photographs were used to suggest these were evidence of Bambers culpability, when all along the photographs prove police culpability...

Why did the police put the rifle from the bedroom window upon Sheila's body, and photograph it there, and promote the idea that this was how Jeremy Bamber had staged the crime scene as such to deliberately fool police into accepting that his sister had taken her own life. We now know that this presentation to the jury was a deliberate fabrication on the part of the police / prosecution case. This is proveable because the rifle was photographed (23) leaning against the bedroom window frame, before it was photographed on the body. It must follow that police moved the rifle at the window, and they put it on the body (26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, etc). Anyone looking at this batch of 7 photographs would be drawn to the conclusion that the body with the rifle upon it, looks manufactured. That is because it was...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Why was the gun resting against the bedroom window frame (23), in the very first photograph taken of the main bedroom, if Jeremy Bamber had killed his sister already and staged her body with the gun upon it by 'that' stage?  It doesn't add up or make any sense, it therefore cannot possibly be true. Police did not find Sheila's body on the bedroom floor, with 'that' rifle set upon her body as claimed by police. Sheila could not have already been shot twice, laid on the bedroom floor, whilst the gun that is supposed to have fired both shots was photographed (23) against the bedroom window, since if she had already been shot twice by that stage, police had removed the rifle from the body and rested it back against the window, to enable PC Bird (after his arrival at the scene) to photograph it there. But where was the body at that stage? How was it laid on the bedroom floor whilst the rifle was leaning against the bedroom window? The bible which shows up in later photographs could not have been resting upon the top part of Sheila's right arm, because the arm was not positioned on the rifle yet for obvious reasons. Her body was more than likely rolled over upon its right side in the recovery position. At some stage police had to have placed Sheila's body into the recovery position, and roll it back into the supine position, before PC Bird was able to photograph the rifle from the window on the body as per photographs, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, etc. Since, PC David Bird did not start taking photographs until 10 O'clock onwards, and the rifle was photographed (23) at the window, thereafter, police must have already rolled Sheila's body into theWith the gun photographed (23) at the bedroom window, how could Jeremy Bamber have supposedly set the scene in the bedroom with 'that' rifle on his sisters body to fool the police and everybody else into thinking Sheila 'had' taken her own life? He couldn't have, and he didn't...
« Last Edit: November 21, 2015, 01:14:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I think what is very telling, is the fact that according to Detective Inspector Ron Cook the rifle was not checked and made safe, until after he arrived at the scene, moved Sheila's hand and the rifle. Cook stated once he removed the rifle, he gave it to PI Montgomery who checked it to see if it was still loaded with bullets, before giving it back to Ron Cook who then placed it against the window. The thing is, Cook is lying through his teeth. He is lying through his teeth, because the rifle was not on the body when PC Bird took photograph 23, but was on the body when photographs, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 31, etc, were taken.
« Last Edit: November 21, 2015, 01:31:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
The jury would have been influenced by the bundle of crime scene photographs depicting the rifle laid on Sheila Caffells body, and the testimony of both Detective Inspector Ron Cook, and Police Constable David Bird, stating that the body of Sheila had been photographed exactly as it had been originally found, untouched and unmoved. When you have a police officer testifying to that effect in the presence of the jury, and the jury have been provided with the photographs of the rifle being grasped on the victims body, and the prosecution are drilling it into the minds of the jury, that the body and the gun upon it is evidence that Jeremy Bamber killed his sister and set the scene the make it appear like his sister had shot the others, before having turned the gun upon herself - yet, all along it had been the police themselves, who had set the scene with the rifle from the bedroom window onto Sheila's body so they could photograph her body as though she had killed herself. At trial, the photographs were used to suggest these were evidence of Bambers culpability, when all along the photographs prove police culpability...

Why did the police put the rifle from the bedroom window upon Sheila's body, and photograph it there, and promote the idea that this was how Jeremy Bamber had staged the crime scene as such to deliberately fool police into accepting that his sister had taken her own life. We now know that this presentation to the jury was a deliberate fabrication on the part of the police / prosecution case. This is proveable because the rifle was photographed (23) leaning against the bedroom window frame, before it was photographed on the body. It must follow that police moved the rifle at the window, and they put it on the body (26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, etc). Anyone looking at this batch of 7 photographs would be drawn to the conclusion that the body with the rifle upon it, looks manufactured. That is because it was...

Mike do you have all the 1986 trial transcripts?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21081
I don't think anybody does.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
I don't think anybody does.

Then how comes mike has some transcripts.