Mystery of the presence of human blood both ends of the silencer, 13th August...

[mike tesko]

During her testimony at the trial, Glynis Howard stated that there was a presence of blood inside both ends of the silencer she examined at the lab' on the 13th August 1985. This crucial piece of evidence appears to have been overlooked with regards to the alleged use of the silencer in the shooting of Sheila caffell, since no blood was found anywhere on the thread on the end of the anshuzt rifles barrel, nor inside the end of the barrel itself. Furthermore, DNA was detected in the mother thread of the silencer, yet no such corresponding DNA found upon the male thread of the rifles barrel - suggestive of the fact that the silencer could not have been fitted to the barrel of the anshuzt rifle, without leaving traces of blood and DNA being deposited from the inner female thread of the silencer, onto the male thread on the end of the guns barrel...

Proof confirming this, can be found in the trial testimony of Glynis Howard...

[scipio_usmc]

During her testimony at the trial, Glynis Howard stated that there was a presence of blood inside both ends of the silencer she examined at the lab' on the 13th August 1985. This crucial piece of evidence appears to have been overlooked with regards to the alleged use of the silencer in the shooting of Sheila caffell, since no blood was found anywhere on the thread on the end of the anshuzt rifles barrel, nor inside the end of the barrel itself. Furthermore, DNA was detected in the mother thread of the silencer, yet no such corresponding DNA found upon the male thread of the rifles barrel - suggestive of the fact that the silencer could not have been fitted to the barrel of the anshuzt rifle, without leaving traces of blood and DNA being deposited from the inner female thread of the silencer, onto the male thread on the end of the guns barrel...

Proof confirming this, can be found in the trial testimony of Glynis Howard...

Since you lie so much post her testimony as proof.

Defense expert Lincoln among others doesn't support your claims but what else is new...

The official documents and defense expert Lincoln say blood was found on the threads inside the front of the weapon.  Inside of the openings is a "shelf" that is threaded. This is where the blood was sitting that the family saw, which Howard removed and tested to see if it was human blood. The lab and Lincoln both stated there was no blood beyond the 8th baffle which rules out the other end of the moderator because that was WELL past the 8th baffle.

[mike tesko]

...

[mike tesko]

Here are the corresponding silencers, examined at the Lab' on the 13th August 1985, and the 25th September 1985:-

[mike tesko]

...

[mike tesko]

It seems to me, that differently designed silencers were examined on the two occasions, firstly on the 13th August 1985, and secondly, on the 25th September 1985, two differently designed Parker Hale Silencer, one silencer with 'Parker Hale' ingrained into it, the other without any engraving...

[mike tesko]

As has been demonstrated, the silencer which Glynis Howard examined on the 13th August 1985, had blood smears present on both ends, that is, 'THE MUZZLE END', and the 'END WHICH FITS CLOSEST TO THE BARREL OF THE RIFLE', as confirmed in her testimony from page 3 of the trial transcript onward:-

[mike tesko]

How could blood be present on both ends of the silencer, yet no trace of corresponding blood found on the threads at the muzzle screw thread end of the anshuzt rifles barrel? This strongly suggests that blood on that en of the silencer got there when it was not fitted to the barrel of the anshuzt rifle at all, does it not...

[mike tesko]

Lets take the matter a step further, a fact which could not possibly have been known at the time of the trial, was that in 2000 / 2002, DNA said to belong to Sheila Caffell was found to be present upon the internal thread of the silencer - do not these factors, when coupled with the presence of blood on the gun barrel end of the silencer not suggest that the silencer could not have been fitted to this silencer because of a lack of corresponding blood on the thread of the gun barrel, and that the presence of Sheila's DNA present in the female thread of the silencer, is consistent with the silencer having been screwed onto the thread of the rifles barrel which had been in direct contact with Sheila's body at the time she was killed, and that there was cross contamination between the thread of the guns barrel, and the female thread of the silencer, when DI 'Ron' Cook, screwed both together prior to sending the rifle and the silencer back to the lab', confirmed by photographs he took of these exercises which he sent to the lab' for the attention of Malcolm Fletcher...

[scipio_usmc]

As has been demonstrated, the silencer which Glynis Howard examined on the 13th August 1985, had blood smears present on both ends, that is, 'THE MUZZLE END', and the 'END WHICH FITS CLOSEST TO THE BARREL OF THE RIFLE', as confirmed in her testimony from page 3 of the trial transcript onward:-

You either possess the reading comprehension skills of a flea or are intentionally lying and think we are too stupid to read plain English.

Her testimony doesn't reference any blood inside the other end of the moderator only blood inside the front opening which she called the bore.

Her testimony initially referenced blood outside the moderator:

1) on the face- which she referred to as the flat part.

2) on part of the knurled tip

She then talked about the rifle not the moderator. 

Subsequently she was asked again about the moderator and stated:

"In addition to the [outside] areas I have described I found actually inside the bore, just inside the bore, some blood staining attached to that surface."

This is the only blood her testimony referenced being found inside. 

[scipio_usmc]

This should be added to the archive for Howard's testimony.

[Zoso]

This should be added to the archive for Howard's testimony.

Done

[mike tesko]

It clearly states that Howard found blood at both ends of the silencer...

[mike tesko]

It clearly states that Howard found blood at both ends of the silencer...

Page 3:-

Q - Did you discover any blood on the exterior of the moderator? A - Yes, there was.
Q - Whereabouts? A - There was a smear of blood actually on the flat surface.
Q - the flat surface immediately outside the muzzle end? A - Yes.
Q - what sort of size are we talking about? A - something about, 1/4" X 1/8th".
Q - In depth to the smear? A - No, it is simply described as a smear.
Q - It is 1/4" X 1/8th? A - There was some blood staining actually in the knurled end.

Mr Justice Drake - Actually in, as opposed to on? A - within the dips in the surface, like little holes in the surface.

Q - On the outside? A - Yes.
Q - On the outside but in the holes? A- The actual ridges formed dips in the surface and the blood was actually in those. There was also blood staining in the ridge on the opposite end where the name was stamped.

Q - That part nearest to the rifle if it was attached? A - Yes, that is correct.
Q - What was the nature of the staining? A - I simply described it as some blood staining. There was very little actually...

-------------------------------------

For those amongst us who can read, it clear states that there was blood of sorts at both ends of the moderator, in keeping with what I have said. The moron amongst us can basically fuck off, because all he can say is He's lying, or similar bullshit. Fuck Off back to the other site and brag there about what a fucking fine fellow he is. He's a piece of donkey dung. He's the one who lies, all the time. I hate the fucking cunt. He's told that many lies he convinces himself its all true, and hypocrites believe him...

[scipio_usmc]

Page 3:-

Q - Did you discover any blood on the exterior of the moderator? A - Yes, there was.
Q - Whereabouts? A - There was a smear of blood actually on the flat surface.
Q - the flat surface immediately outside the muzzle end? A - Yes.
Q - what sort of size are we talking about? A - something about, 1/4" X 1/8th".
Q - In depth to the smear? A - No, it is simply described as a smear.

It says blood on the OUTSIDE on the flat part. The face is what she was referring to as the flat part. The muzzle end of the moderator means the end that was not attached to the rifle. The muzzle is the end where the bullet leaves through.

You either possess the comprehension skills of a flea or are intentionally trying to fool us but your efforts are a complete waste of time because we are not anywhere near as dumb as you wish we were.