Author Topic: Trudie being vague again:  (Read 8949 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Trudie being vague again:
« on: October 29, 2015, 10:16:PM »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2015, 10:18:PM »
https://youtu.be/9seXCDo4nlA

Sorry here is the link.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2015, 10:20:PM »
I see Trudie wasn't discussing with Leo Mckinsty this time. Don't blame here.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2015, 10:57:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2015, 10:21:PM »
The police are withholding evidence which could free Bamber ?

Bleedin hell. The police have been naughty.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2015, 10:24:PM »
Nothing Trudie has read 'in the last five years has convinced Trudie Bamber is guilty'.

Bleedin hell. Talk about giving someone the benefit of the doubt.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2015, 10:26:PM »
It sounds a bit like a staple gun with the silencer attached. What exactly is Trudi's status anyway?

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2015, 10:27:PM »
I don't think she is being vague, I just think she doesn't know.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2015, 10:30:PM »
'Non disclosure has been huge'.

Bleedin hell. CAL, Poppy, Jan, Lookout, Caroline and Jeremy have said they have everything.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2015, 10:33:PM »
'Jeremy hasn't had a fair trial or fair appeals'.

Bleedin hell. Try telling that to the tax payers.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2015, 10:37:PM »
A petition two months old has nearly a 1000 signatures.

That's 16 a day from the campaign juggernaut.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2015, 10:58:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2015, 10:41:PM »
I would like to see evidence that the police are withholding evidence. Bamber supporters just stating this to the media is not enough.

Similar to the supporters not having any evidence to support Bambers innocence. Or not having any evidence to refute the evidence that there was a massive frame. Just repeating something does not make it correct.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2015, 10:54:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2015, 10:43:PM »
Trudie claims a huge amount of documents were released after the 2002 appeal.

That must be why the 2012 CCRC application failed.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2015, 10:46:PM »
Apparently the documents they have received since 2002 highlights what documents are still missing.

So that explains the failed CCRC application failure. Nice more Trudie. 
« Last Edit: October 29, 2015, 10:55:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2015, 10:48:PM »
Yes Trudie you are not a 'sad woman'.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2015, 10:51:PM »
Trudie says Jeremy 'doesn't have a family that's rallying behind him'.

No Trudie, he doesn't.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.