Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?

[Caroline]

so theres no reason not to publish the letters then.

No have absolutely no chance! 

[nugnug]

No have absolutely no chance! 

why not give us a reason.

[Adam]

why not give us a reason.

Caroline was a long term passionate Bamber supporter. 

Bamber's letters to her would have been thanking her for her support and answering her questions, probably unconvincingly.

Now a passionate guilter it's doubtful Caroline will want to post letters relating to her support.

Mike and David have posted Bamber's letters on here. Both were and still are supporters.

[nugnug]

yes they have so theres no real reason to we know from her posts carline was a prvious supporter so why should that be a problem.

[Caroline]

why not give us a reason.

That's simple Nug Nug - the reason is that it has fuck all to do with you! Is that plain enough? What gives you the right to ask me to post letters that weren't sent to satisfy your (or the other idiot's) curiosity? Put your money where your mouth is and write to him yourself - I'm not doing your donkey work for you!

I might believe he's guilty but whatever he told me or didn't tell me will be a subject that 'I CHOOSE' to share - BUT (and let me make this clear), I would NOT post letters on the open forum. There are people I would NEVER share info with and you would be one of them.

[nugnug]

its everything to do with me and other posters because you brought it here in the first place

[Caroline]

its everything to do with me and other posters because you brought it here in the first place

Brought what here?

[Stephanie]

its everything to do with me and other posters because you brought it here in the first place

On that basis, why do you refuse to answer any questions in relation to the Billy Middleton case and the murder of an innocent baby girl?

[nugnug]

That's simple Nug Nug - the reason is that it has fuck all to do with you! Is that plain enough? What gives you the right to ask me to post letters that weren't sent to satisfy your (or the other idiot's) curiosity? Put your money where your mouth is and write to him yourself - I'm not doing your donkey work for you!

I might believe he's guilty but whatever he told me or didn't tell me will be a subject that 'I CHOOSE' to share - BUT (and let me make this clear), I would NOT post letters on the open forum. There are people I would NEVER share info with and you would be one of them.

david has mike has whats the problem with you doing it.

[Caroline]

david has mike has whats the problem with you doing it.

Brought what here?

[Stephanie]

its everything to do with me and other posters because you brought it here in the first place

Have you heard of virtual mobbing Nugnug?

[Caroline]

Have you heard of virtual mobbing Nugnug?

I have something he wants but he can be rest assured, he'll never have it! 

[nugnug]

i can only conclude that the letters do not say we have been led to belive.

[Caroline]

i can only conclude that the letters do not say we have been led to belive.

That must be right then - however, you'll never get to see them so I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. Although I don't imagine for one moment you even know what has been said! 

[maggie]

i can only conclude that the letters do not say we have been led to belive.

Personally I don't understand your argument on this nugs. Imo it's never right to post up someone's personal letters on a public forum without permission from the author.  It is however the owner ie. The addressee of the letter's personal choice whether they choose to do this and some do while other's don't.
I can't see there is anything sinister in choosing not to.