Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?

[nugnug]

well posters can make of your reply what they will to me it says youve been less than honest about your cliams and that those clias no longer have any credibility but ill let others form there own judgment

[nugnug]

I have something he wants but he can be rest assured, he'll never have it! 

i dont care weather i see them or not your reply has allready told me all  i need to know.

[Caroline]

well posters can make of your reply what they will to me it says youve been less than honest about your cliams and that those clias no longer have any credibility but ill let others form there own judgment

What claims would those be? You don't even seem to know what it is I specifically claimed, you're simply jumping on the tail coats of another poster. Pathetic really. I couldn't give a flying crap what you (or others like you) think. You never had any credibility so from you - the above means a BIG FAT ZERO!

[Adam]

It's no secret Caroline was a long term passionate supporter of Bamber. And they exchanged letters supporting each other.

Now a passionate guilter she will not want to remind everyone of her judgement error, by posting the nice letters a convicted killer sent to her.

[maggie]

It's no secret Caroline was a long term passionate supporter of Bamber. And they exchanged letters supporting each other.

Now a passionate guilter she will not want to remind everyone of her judgement error, by posting the nice letters a convicted killer sent to her.

Think that's a pretty poor argument as well, Adam. Why d o especially it matter, anyway?

[Adam]

i can only conclude that the letters do not say we have been led to belive.

I doubt that anything Bamber wrote in these letters made himself look more guilty. Bamber isn't stupid and his own letters probably made him look more innocent.

Caroline said herself she only changed stance after Bamber didn't answer her question on the last harvest. Rather than because of anything he had written. I was also creating a lot of threads at the time, which two posters confirmed made them change stance at this time.

However it would still be interesting to read Bamber's letters as he may give things away. Such as when he said to Caroline he now has all documents.  Prior to the CT currently claiming there are lots of undisclosed documents. 

[nugnug]

What claims would those be? You don't even seem to know what it is I specifically claimed, you're simply jumping on the tail coats of another poster. Pathetic really. I couldn't give a flying crap what you (or others like you) think. You never had any credibility so from you - the above means a BIG FAT ZERO!

you claimed he avoided your question about the wallet but for some strange reason you refuse to back up that cliam.

as I said ill  leave people to make of that ewhat they will.

[Caroline]

you claimed he avoided your question about the wallet but for some strange reason you refuse to back up that cliam.

as I said ill  leave people to make of that ewhat they will.

He did 

[Caroline]

It's no secret Caroline was a long term passionate supporter of Bamber. And they exchanged letters supporting each other.

Now a passionate guilter she will not want to remind everyone of her judgement error, by posting the nice letters a convicted killer sent to her.

As usual your post is a complete contradiction, if it's no secret why would I need to remind anyone? 

You can try and be as sarcastic as you like (although you're not every good at it) but at least instead of writing mountains of repetitive bullshit on a forum, I had the guts to confront the man himself and ask HIM what I wanted to you. You and your little keyboard warriors can sit in the confines of your bedroom under a methane haze and play detective all you like, but you haven't got a clue!

[Adam]

If I was a guilter and had letters from Bamber, I would post extracts of the letters if it supported my view on an issue. You can't have a better source than Bamber himself.

People put up links to witness statements, court testimonies, videos and articles. Both for and against people involved in the case. So I would not feel guilty about putting extracts of letters from Bamber. Other posters have.

Bamber  knows his letters could find there way into the public domain, which I'm sure he does not mind, otherwise he would not send them. And him & his supporters dish it out to Julie, the relatives and police enough.

[Caroline]

If I was a guilter and had letters from Bamber, I would post extracts of the letters if it supported my view on an issue. You can't have a better source than Bamber himself.

People put up links to witness statements, court testimonies, videos and articles. Both for and against people involved in the case. So I would not feel guilty about putting extracts of letters from Bamber. Other posters have.

Bamber  knows his letters could find there way into the public domain, which I'm sure he does not mind, otherwise he would not send them. And him & his supporters dish it out to Julie, the relatives and police enough.

Other posters may have but I don't think it's right. However, in order to PROVE that he told me he has almost all of the PII stuff - here is an extract from a letter I received asking him about Mike's theory of Sheila on the bed. He states here that he received 'almost' all of the PII stuff after they stopped contact so he now has no need to speculate. I don't lie! What would be the point?

[Steve_uk]

Maybe he doesn't know whether he has received all documents. According to Poppy Ann Miller there were some empty boxes. Or are they all clutching at straws?  http://poppymeze.blogspot.co.uk/2016_11_01_archive.html

[David1819]

Other posters may have but I don't think it's right. However, in order to PROVE that he told me he has almost all of the PII stuff - here is an extract from a letter I received asking him about Mike's theory of Sheila on the bed. He states here that he received 'almost' all of the PII stuff after they stopped contact so he now has no need to speculate.

You were asked to post the letters where you allegedly caught him out and became convinced of his guilt. Posting a cut out of a single sentence from Jeremy about PII is a typical insubstantial reply from you. Its a red herring shrouded in the impression of an honest answer. 

I don't lie! What would be the point?

 

[Steve_uk]

You were asked to post the letters where you allegedly caught him out and became convinced of his guilt. Posting a cut out of a single sentence from Jeremy about PII is a typical insubstantial reply from you. Its a red herring shrouded in the impression of an honest answer. 

 

If you'd followed the case you'd know that one of the questions he failed to answer satisfactorily was how he knew the contents of Nevill's wallet, and another which had been mentioned was the conversation about the last load of rapeseed on the Tuesday evening.

I seem to recall you keeping your cards close to your chest a few months back regarding your forensic breakthrough of Sheila. Is the pot calling the kettle black perhaps..

[Samson]

If you'd followed the case you'd know that one of the questions he failed to answer satisfactorily was how he knew the contents of Nevill's wallet, and another which had been mentioned was the conversation about the last load of rapeseed on the Tuesday evening.

I seem to recall you keeping your cards close to your chest a few months back regarding your forensic breakthrough of Sheila. Is the pot calling the kettle black perhaps..

Steve_uk, what do you think of these thoughts from IA?

IMO he's completely innocent. The police theory does not fit the crime scene, and it does not fit their own records. The case boils down to a couple of pieces of flimsy evidence versus a more plausible explanation of what happened. The people who "found" that evidence thereby gained Bamber's inheritance. The conviction is bullshit and should be overturned.

The guy that wrote that has an encyclopedic knowledge of hundreds of criminal cases world wide.

Charlie Wilkes.