Author Topic: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?  (Read 50214 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #375 on: October 27, 2015, 06:35:PM »
The reason for this is, I think, Bamber wanted it to look like a frenzied attack.
or it was done by a mentally ill person.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #376 on: October 27, 2015, 06:36:PM »
The reason for this is, I think, Bamber wanted it to look like a frenzied attack.






Well of course you would say that.I was waiting !

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #377 on: October 27, 2015, 06:37:PM »
or it was done by a mentally ill person.

By mentally ill person you mean Sheila. But I think the evidence shows she didn't do anything of the sort, but don't let that get in your way.  :-\






Well of course you would say that.I was waiting !

Glad not to dissapoint you.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #378 on: October 27, 2015, 06:38:PM »
The reason for this is, I think, Bamber wanted it to look like a frenzied attack.

And the rifle was not powerful. So had no choice.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #379 on: October 27, 2015, 06:38:PM »
By mentally ill person you mean Sheila. But I think the evidence shows she didn't do anything of the sort, but don't let that get in your way.  :-\

Glad not to dissapoint you.





Oh you certainly don't do that----------pity about the spelling though. ;D

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #380 on: October 27, 2015, 06:40:PM »
And the rifle was not powerful. So had no choice.

not powerful? It killed 5 people?

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #381 on: October 27, 2015, 06:41:PM »
And the rifle was not powerful. So had no choice.

Would have been even less powerful if Bamber hadn't have got the gun he wanted.






Oh you certainly don't do that----------pity about the spelling though. ;D

Oh, am I not a great speller Lookout? I am sorry for that I'm quite dyslexic but I have managed to get myself over something that can be quite limiting for people. But then again I think spelling a couple of words wrong on the internet is forgivable - posting propaganda for a convicted child killer when you constantly get FACTS wrong, not so forgivable.


Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #382 on: October 27, 2015, 06:42:PM »
not powerful? It killed 5 people?


And had it been powerful enough to kill with one, well aimed shot for each victim, it quite obviously wouldn't have been Sheila.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #383 on: October 27, 2015, 06:43:PM »
not powerful? It killed 5 people?

Eventually. After 20+ close range shots.

A Magnum would blow you're head clean off. But Clint always went for body shots.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #384 on: October 27, 2015, 06:44:PM »
not powerful? It killed 5 people?

Any of the guns could have killed 5 people. But with a lot of effort and mess. the more powerful weapon seemed to struggle to get the intended job done.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #385 on: October 27, 2015, 06:46:PM »
Would have been even less powerful if Bamber hadn't have got the gun he wanted.


Oh, am I not a great speller Lookout? I am sorry for that I'm quite dyslexic but I have managed to get myself over something that can be quite limiting for people. But then again I think spelling a couple of words wrong on the internet is forgivable - posting propaganda for a convicted child killer when you constantly get FACTS wrong, not so forgivable.







Oh dear,it's I feel sorry for me time. ::) Playing the sympathy card doesn't work with me Mat. While you're at it,prove that what I say is propaganda. After all,it's only the opposite of what you say !

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #386 on: October 27, 2015, 06:49:PM »






Oh dear,it's I feel sorry for me time. ::) Playing the sympathy card doesn't work with me Mat. While you're at it,prove that what I say is propaganda. After all,it's only the opposite of what you say !

Sympathy card? Being dyslexic isn't an illness  ;D In fact most people wouldn't even be able to tell from most of my posts.




 While you're at it,prove that what I say is propaganda. After all,it's only the opposite of what you say !

Aren't you the one who posted the lies about what Ralph was wearing in his photograph? Yes.
You preach the official sites propaganda about a phone call from Neville.
Aren't you one who pretends there is a hidden, secret COLP report?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #387 on: October 27, 2015, 07:42:PM »
Sympathy card? Being dyslexic isn't an illness  ;D In fact most people wouldn't even be able to tell from most of my posts.

Aren't you the one who posted the lies about what Ralph was wearing in his photograph? Yes.
You preach the official sites propaganda about a phone call from Neville.
Aren't you one who pretends there is a hidden, secret COLP report?






Where did you dig these oddities up from ? Lies about " what Ralph was wearing ? What's that about ?
Preach " about a phone-call ?" Wasn't there a poll/discussion among OUR posters here about that,or is it that you just want to single me out ?
Pretends there's " a hidden secret COLP report ?".When ?
What the heck ARE you on about ?

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #388 on: October 27, 2015, 07:49:PM »





Where did you dig these oddities up from ? Lies about " what Ralph was wearing ? What's that about ?
Preach " about a phone-call ?" Wasn't there a poll/discussion among OUR posters here about that,or is it that you just want to single me out ?
Pretends there's " a hidden secret COLP report ?".When ?
What the heck ARE you on about ?

For God's sake Lookout, you know what I am talking about on every point! NOW you really are showing deceit - because all of these have been talked about a lot recently.
But taking them one by one.

You claimed a "source" had told you information about the state of Nevilles pyjama top.
NGB and Caroline - who have seen the photo corrected you. I believe the two of them.

A phonecall poll was posted here, by Caroline I believe, not because there is any truth to it but to show that MOST people don't believe it. The phone call is official site propaganda - I think you're the only person here who believes it.

The second hidden COLP report was posted about by.......YOU when you were going on aboutcomments made by AE in her COLP statement - Patti traced these back to a pro Jeremy blog - by someone of the name of Poppy - who was claiming there is a hidden COLP report.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?
« Reply #389 on: October 27, 2015, 07:54:PM »





Where did you dig these oddities up from ? Lies about " what Ralph was wearing ? What's that about ?
Preach " about a phone-call ?" Wasn't there a poll/discussion among OUR posters here about that,or is it that you just want to single me out ?
Pretends there's " a hidden secret COLP report ?".When ?
What the heck ARE you on about ?

Yes, there was a poll Lookout and the majority of posters thought that Nevill didn't call the police - it was removed and I still see no good reason why that happened.
Few people have the imagination for reality