shiela atending a party.

[nugnug]

did shiela atend a party on the night in qustion.

[scipio_usmc]

did shiela atend a party on the night in qustion.

What's the night in question?  Are you referring to the party the weekend before the murders or are you referring to a party where she encountered Freddie?

[Caroline]

did shiela atend a party on the night in qustion.

Nugs, you have posted here for years, surly you know Sheila didn't attend a party on the night of the murders? 

[lookout]

I should imagine that her itchy feet wanted to go and party again,but she'd found another outlet for all her pent-up energy ! Sadly !!

[Jane]

I should imagine that her itchy feet wanted to go and party again,but she'd found another outlet for all her pent-up energy ! Sadly !!

From most of what is said of her behaviour during her last week on earth, she could barely put one foot in front of the other, let alone scratch an itch.

[Caroline]

I should imagine that her itchy feet wanted to go and party again,but she'd found another outlet for all her pent-up energy ! Sadly !!

Lookout, you know that isn't true and anyone even slightly familiar with the case knows that she was hardly the life and soul of the Saturday night party. I don't see how anyone could paint Sheila as a 'good time girl' because it just simply wasn't the case!

[maggie]

Lookout, you know that isn't true and anyone even slightly familiar with the case knows that she was hardly the life and soul of the Saturday night party. I don't see how anyone could paint Sheila as a 'good time girl' because it just simply wasn't the case!

Obviously, due to her adoption, upbringing and illness Sheila was always looking for love in all the wrong places.  Very sad imo

[lookout]

Lookout, you know that isn't true and anyone even slightly familiar with the case knows that she was hardly the life and soul of the Saturday night party. I don't see how anyone could paint Sheila as a 'good time girl' because it just simply wasn't the case!

I don't think anyone in Sheila's position would have been " the life and soul of a party " with the prospect of heading to WHF," losing her husband " and the possibility of also " losing " the twins.

[Caroline]

I don't think anyone in Sheila's position would have been " the life and soul of a party " with the prospect of heading to WHF," losing her husband " and the possibility of also " losing " the twins.

Losing her husband? The were divorced and I don't think she feared 'losing the twins'. The ONLY source for such a suggestion was Jeremy. I don't believe for one moment that June or Nevill would suggest or want her to be parted from her children - but of course it does make a neat little motive for a psychotic episode - one which might lead a 'crazy sister' to kill her parents, her children and ultimately - herself.

[Jan]

Losing her husband? The were divorced and I don't think she feared 'losing the twins'. The ONLY source for such a suggestion was Jeremy. I don't believe for one moment that June or Nevill would suggest or want her to be parted from her children - but of course it does make a neat little motive for a psychotic episode - one which might lead a 'crazy sister' to kill her parents, her children and ultimately - herself.

so if her diaries turned up and contained just those fears would you consider them relevant?

[Caroline]

so if her diaries turned up and contained just those fears would you consider them relevant?

That's quite a few if's for something so specific? 'IF' they turned up and 'IF' they contained such evidence - then it would support Jeremy's claim of the discussion around the table. If they didn't contain such fears - what would you consider?

[guest154]

so if her diaries turned up and contained just those fears would you consider them relevant?

You'd want to see them first though, right? Being told that Sheilas diaries has turned up and showed her worries and deteriorating mind, is one thing, seeing them and them actually being her diaries - would be something else.

That's quite a few if's for something so specific? 'IF' they turned up and 'IF' they contained such evidence - then it would support Jeremy's claim of the discussion around the table. If they didn't contain such fears - what would you consider?

Missing pages, withheld under PII. 

[scipio_usmc]

so if her diaries turned up and contained just those fears would you consider them relevant?

Not really since the evidence that convicted Jeremy is that Sheila can't have killed herself but rather was murdered like everyone else and that Jeremy had been planning to kill them and admitted afterwards to being responsible.  The only thing relevant is what can counter such.  It is not some accident this is what the defense concentrates on.  This is what the defense MUST counter.

[Caroline]

You'd want to see them first though, right? Being told that Sheilas diaries has turned up and showed her worries and deteriorating mind, is one thing, seeing them and them actually being her diaries - would be something else.

Missing pages, withheld under PII. 

Oh YES! I would want to see them, there's no way I would believe anything unless I had seen it for myself. However, I still wouldn't think she was the killer - I'm confident that Jeremy was.

[Jan]

That's quite a few if's for something so specific? 'IF' they turned up and 'IF' they contained such evidence - then it would support Jeremy's claim of the discussion around the table. If they didn't contain such fears - what would you consider?

I just think they would be interesting either way ,and of course they would not prove anything but they could be an indication of how she was feeling. She does not strike me as someone who would just use it for dates and actions.