Colin said he would have killed June

[scipio_usmc]

Oh shut up Scipo - they are man's slippers - the picture you posted looks NOTHING like the slippers in the CS picture!  You seem to have developed a bit of a vendetta - guess you don't like being proved wrong - oh well, nighty night! 

You have zero evidence they are man's slippers.  You made the claim up just because you want support for your made up claims that Nevill was in that bedroom.  There ar eplenty of female slippers tha tlook like this:




You posted tweed plaid slippers.  I posted black cotton slippers.  Canvas is made from cotton so he material and color I posted is much closer than what you posted.  You complaining is a laugh.  Like Mike's posts that sees to be all yous are good for.

[Caroline]

You have zero evidence they are man's slippers.  You made the claim up just because you want support for your made up claims that Nevill was in that bedroom.  There ar eplenty of female slippers tha tlook like this:




You posted tweed plaid slippers.  I posted black cotton slippers.  Canvas is made from cotton so he material and color I posted is much closer than what you posted.  You complaining is a laugh.  Like Mike's posts that sees to be all yous are good for.

Seriously? You want to argue that a 27 year old woman would wear those?  By the way, the errrrr ''official' stance is that they were 'canvas SHOES' - you might want to follow that avenue! Musn't divert from the 'official' train of thought - god forbid someone might have an original idea! (Not you though!!)

[scipio_usmc]

Seriously? You want to argue that a 27 year old woman would wear those?  By the way, the errrrr ''official' stance is that they were 'canvas SHOES' - you might want to follow that avenue! Musn't divert from the 'official' train of thought - god forbid someone might have an original idea! (Not you though!!)

I can post countless slippers that look similar that which are made for women.  I posted a bunch of links in your thread about slippers.  Obviously women are buying them or they would not make them. 

[Jane]

I posted them to show the style. The style is used for men and women. In the meantime we can't see the toe area of the shoes in question and for all we know they are rounded and thus even more obviously female. 

What you posted were not canvas shoes or even black so it is amusing watching you try to get picky to try to defense your nonsense lies.

Making up BS like you do is not debating it is simply making up things which is just what Mike happens to do.

We have you making up that Sheila's slippers were Nevill's so you can pretend you have support for your made up claim he was sleeping in her room and Sheila in his bed though it is clearly every bit nonsense like Mike spews.

And the footwear YOU posted in no way resembled the type of slipper WE are talking about. Those great thick rubber soles make yours look like outdoor footwear. OURS are what is referred to as HOUSE SLIPPERS.

You put words in Caroline -and anyone else's mouth- if it doesn't fit with YOUR thinking, but she ISN'T saying the slippers owned by Sheila were really Neville's slippers because it's obvious to everyone but you, that a fashion conscious 27 year old wouldn't have OWNED a pair of old men's WINTER slippers, but obviously SOMEONE owned them, so stop playing the spoilt brat and wake up to the fact that, whilst anything is possible -you see I have more of an open mind that you- it's far more LIKELY that an elderly man is the owner of slippers designed for the elderly, that is his fashion conscious 27 year old daughter. I'll go one stage further, shall I? I think it's doubtful that Sheila even BOUGHT slippers with her. She MAY not even have owned slippers. The black canvas espadrilles -the ones the police took away?- she was seen wearing would have served the purpose.

[lookout]

I do have to wonder why those black canvas shoes were whipped away like they were. It's a question which needs an answer.

[Caroline]

I can post countless slippers that look similar that which are made for women.  I posted a bunch of links in your thread about slippers.  Obviously women are buying them or they would not make them.

No you didn't, the stuff you posted is nothing like the slippers in question - the picture I just posted is about as near as you can get and they are described as 'Old men slipper'. I'm not being dishonest though, you are - posting pictures that are nothing like the original and trying to pass that off as proof is just laughable. You are totally predictable and will pick away at this because I dared to suggest you might be wrong about something (and you were/are) - you're WRONG about this too. There's not much you're getting right at the moment - is there?  'Sucks for you' - I believe that's an Americanism for 'oh dear'? 

[buddy]

I'm bored with scipio's nonsense.
He is a trouble maker IMO.

[nugnug]

what great diffrence do thses slippers make to anything anyway.

[Caroline]

I'm bored with scipio's nonsense.
He is a trouble maker IMO.

Well, you see Buddy, I dared to tell him he was wrong about something and now (predictably) he will pick at everything I say - even down to arguing over a pair of slippers that are clearly from the 'old man' section of M&S (also available at other department stores and footwear outlets - and online). Sad really, but you are certainly right about the boredom aspect, oh! And the nonsense.  .

Question for the ladies ......... If your significant other bought you a pair of said slippers, how over the moon would you be?

Question for the men ....... If you bought a pair of said slippers for you significant other, how long would you expect to be sleeping in the spare room/on the sofa? 

[buddy]

None Nugs.

[nugnug]

i cant see how thses slippers have any significance to crime who ever they belonged to.

[Caroline]

what great diffrence do thses slippers make to anything anyway.

Probably none but they could be significant and I have already said why they might be. However, Scipio just latched on to drag an argument out.

[buddy]

Probably none but they could be significant and I have already said why they might be. However, Scipio just latched on to drag an argument out.

AS usual.

[Caroline]

i cant see how thses slippers have any significance to crime who ever they belonged to.

Because clearly they are men's slippers and must have belonged to Nevill, however, they aren't in his room, they are in Sheila's. Also when AE talked about a pair of Sheila's shoes being taken by police from her room, she didn't mention these slippers - I'd have thought she'd have picked up on the fact that Nevill's slippers were in Sheila's room. Of course Sheila may simply have borrowed them but as we don't know, it's odd for them to be there!

[buddy]

Because clearly they are men's slippers and must have belonged to Nevill, however, they aren't in his room, they are in Sheila's. Also when AE talked about a pair of Sheila's shoes being taken by police from her room, she didn't mention these slippers - I'd have thought she'd have picked up on the fact that Nevill's slippers were in Sheila's room. Of course Sheila may simply have borrowed them but as we don't know, it's odd for them to be there!

Apparently the police told AE you didn't see this.