Telegraph article :

[scipio_usmc]

good grief Scip, there you go again. discrediting the experts, this chap works for the government and had 50 years experience.

what the hell do you want.

Experts who fail to use recognized science to arrive at conclusions deserve to be criticizesd and it shoudl be pointed out that other experts reject their claims and also pointed out when all they offer is speculation.

Even NASA can't blow up low photos from anothe rphoto to get the level of detail necessary to be able to match a tiny fleck of something against the mantle let alone to the exact shape of her nail varnish scratch.

There is good reason why the courts rejected his claims.  People love to ignore that part and to keep spouting rejected claims.

The experts on the other side who say his methods are not scientifically valid should be rejected though the scientific literature is on their side?

It doesn't even take any expertise just common sense in the meantime to recognize the photos fail to show the underneath side of the mantle and thus can't possible be used to assess what was or was not under such side. 

[notsure]

Perhaps you should let the goverment departments he works for that hes a fake and not really an expert then and knows fa about anything.

[scipio_usmc]

Perhaps you should let the goverment departments he works for that hes a fake and not really an expert then and knows fa about anything.

He doesn't work for the government. The Courts already rejected his claims.

[notsure]

Yes yecdoes do hour research

[David1819]

3. He claims that papers show that 43 police officers entered the house – 17 more than was declared at his original trial.

This is a new one. And an attempt to obtain freedom on a technicality. 17 or 43, what is the problem ?

Bamber should get a retrial and the Crown Prosecutors know it, The Law knows it. They just wont allow it because they is a good chance he would be found not guilty. A Journalist from the telegraph who attended the trail said he would not have found him guilty based on what was presented.

The misconduct and conflicts of interest at the 1986 trial was apauling, specially by todays standards.

Ideally a retrial with a unanimous guilty verdict would probably crush his campaign and support for good but I cant see the CPS risking it.

Either way Jeremy should have a retrial and I would accept the verdict either way.

Other than a retrial The CPS have two other options

1. Forget about Jeremy
2. Quash his conviction and release him on a gagging order AKA superinjuction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Injunction#UK_superinjunctions
 

[scipio_usmc]

Yes yecdoes do hour research

He doesn't work for the government.  His Photography experience was from working at Kodak where he was a manager in charge of people who investigated defects in their processes.