Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.

[Caroline]

I wonder how much PH was paid over the " threat " fiasco in the Scottish press.

Keep chasing that wagon!

[nugnug]

and this book is supposed to be the pruduct of 10 years resaerch.

[Caroline]

and this book is supposed to be the prudoct of 10 years resaerch.

He's written other book in between.

[lookout]

Reminiscent of starting a letter which you keep putting down until there's a bit more news to write about,which you started weeks previous but 10 years is stretching it a bit.

We've probably more than filled a book on here in 3 years.

[lookout]

He's written other book in between.

Now who's making excuses ?

[Caroline]

Reminiscent of starting a letter which you keep putting down until there's a bit more news to write about,which you started weeks previous but 10 years is stretching it a bit.

We've probably more than filled a book on here in 3 years.

Filled with what though? Certainly only a fraction of it is fact.

[Caroline]

Now who's making excuses ?

Errr, he has written other books. Why would I need to make excuses for PH?

[lookout]

Filled with what though? Certainly only a fraction of it is fact.

A variety I would have said instead of a wholly biased one.

[nugnug]

Reminiscent of starting a letter which you keep putting down until there's a bit more news to write about,which you started weeks previous but 10 years is stretching it a bit.

We've probably more than filled a book on here in 3 years.

and he only finds most of alleged evedence at the end of those 10 years.

and hes suposedly resarched it for 10 years but only decides on guilt in the last 3 months of reasarch yeah right.

and dispite his change the book does not need any rewriting.

[Jan]

Because the book states no one was paid.  The letter makes it clear that they do not want anything in return. After having read the book I believe the author of the anonymous letter wasn't paid.

If you have anything that goes against that - I'd be interested in seeing/hearing it but I don't think you do. I think your dislike of PH is clouding your view on what is a pretty clear matter. I don't particularity like PH either but it seems clear to me there was no need or reason to pay an anonymous letter writer.

He was only anonymous in the book . PH knew who he was.

[Caroline]

A variety I would have said instead of a wholly biased one.

A fraction.

[Caroline]

He was only anonymous in the book . PH knew who he was.

That's what I thought - but having just checked that's not what it says.

[Jan]

Thats a point, if he was 34 at that time or more he'd be at least in his 60s now.

I know Mike put up a doc showing part of his police interview, his age may have been on that. I haven't been able to find it since although I have searched.

I wonder if he is actually dead ? Was Brett interviewed for any other books at all?

[nugnug]

ive never heard of any other interviews by brett other than this alleged one.

[guest154]

A variety I would have said instead of a wholly biased one.

No one would be interested in any of our books because all we have are our opinions. PH spoke with those involved - so he wasn't just giving his opinion.

He was only anonymous in the book . PH knew who he was.

Have you read the book, Jan?

Jan/Lookout. What do you make to Ed Lawsons comments, that Bamber was horrible, wholly interested in money and guilty.

Ed Lawson being junior for Bambers defence team.