Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.

[Adam]

Not if he has died.  I don't know either way but its amazing how sure you are it was Brett because it proves your arguments.  If this |Brett had said he had never believed it was Jeremy and he is sure he's innocent you would be arguing against him.

There is no proof he has died.

As my last post says, it's easy for a researcher to validate his sources. Just ask them a question or two that only they or a handful of people would know.

I trust PH interviewed hundreds of people regarding the case. So can think up lots of questions.

[maggie]

Not a nice way to speak about the people who support him and help keep his name in the public eye though is it?
Doesn't make him guilty but it shows his character.

I think it's irrelevant.  Not sure if it shows his character, it depends how serious he's being and how it's said. 
Many people on here have been rude about people, especially women who write to murderers and no doubt he has more than a few of that ilk ....  its not necessarily his friends and people he trusts he's calling such names, is it|?

[maggie]

There is no proof he has died.

As my last post says, it's easy for a researcher to validate his sources. Just ask them a question or two that only they or a handful of people would know.

I trust PH interviewed hundreds of people regarding the case. So can think up lots of questions.

PH states he is sure it was Brett but as he didn't meet this guy he has no real proof it was him.  If PH hasn't real proof, how can you have it?

[maggie]

There is no proof he has died.

As my last post says, it's easy for a researcher to validate his sources. Just ask them a question or two that only they or a handful of people would know.

I trust PH interviewed hundreds of people regarding the case. So can think up lots of questions.

PH said he had heard a rumour that Brett had died since the interview.  The guy he spoke to claiming to be Brett told PH he was very ill......  so who knows??

[Caroline]

PH states he is sure it was Brett but as he didn't meet this guy he has no real proof it was him.  If PH hasn't real proof, how can you have it?

It's more likely to be him that not. If he called PH, he must have done so through the friend or how would he have PH's number and call him after his friend suggested setting up a meeting? There is no reason to assume it wasn't him.

[Caroline]

I think it's irrelevant.  Not sure if it shows his character, it depends how serious he's being and how it's said. 
Many people on here have been rude about people, especially women who write to murderers and no doubt he has more than a few of that ilk ....  its not necessarily his friends and people he trusts he's calling such names, is it|?

It doesn't mean he is guilty but I do think it shows his character. Can you imagine one of The Birmingham Six or The Guildford Four having derogatory names for people who were trying to show support?

[nugnug]

how come paul harrision gets all these amoumous letters and no other auther does.

[maggie]

It's more likely to be him that not. If he called PH, he must have done so through the friend or how would he have PH's number and call him after his friend suggested setting up a meeting? There is no reason to assume it wasn't him.

I'm not assuming it isn't him, was just hoping for something more positive but that can't be helped.

[maggie]

It doesn't mean he is guilty but I do think it shows his character. Can you imagine one of The Birmingham Six or The Guildford Four having derogatory names for people who were trying to show support?

I agree it shows his character but would like to know who are the people he's talking about.  I'm not making excuses but am trying to be fair,  in all honesty I don't know and I don't think I'm in a position to judge.

[David1819]

Thirty years on, the conspiracy against Jeremy continues.

PH either lied and never spoke to BC.

Or someone pretended to be BC and said harmful lies about Jeremy. Perhaps it was Julie with a false butch voice.

Either way BC could sue PH or publically rubbish the book.

I didn't say its a conspiracy. If PH worded the book correctly saying (Phone call claiming to be Brett Collins) then he is ok cant be sued because that is what happened.

So many people cant decide on guilt or innocence purley because all the nonsense rumors, He said this she said that he said this ect ect ect. Most of it is conflicting BS.

[Caroline]

I agree it shows his character but would like to know who are the people he's talking about.  I'm not making excuses but am trying to be fair,  in all honesty I don't know and I don't think I'm in a position to judge.

Women who write to him. I have heard this before from other sources.

[maggie]

I didn't say its a conspiracy. If PH worded the book correctly saying (Phone call claiming to be Brett Collins) then he is ok cant be sued because that is what happened.

So many people cant decide on guilt or innocence purley because all the nonsense rumors, He said this she said that he said this ect ect ect. Most of it is conflicting BS.

I agree

[Caroline]

The OS are claiming that police officers have come forward with information in support of Bamber. These are nameless people and yet certain members here are willing to believe it and the amount of claims made here that 'someone read somewhere' are too numerous to mention. At least PH is saying that a certain person called him and that person now has a right to refute the claim if it's bogus. However, I fail to see how someone calling himself BC would call at a time when a meeting is in the pipeline - arranged through a friend. Bit of a coincidence.

[nugnug]

It's more likely to be him that not. If he called PH, he must have done so through the friend or how would he have PH's number and call him after his friend suggested setting up a meeting? There is no reason to assume it wasn't him.

so brett phoned him from newzealand did he well that should be easy to establish ethere how he would of found his phone number though im not sure.

[maggie]

The OS are claiming that police officers have come forward with information in support of Bamber. These are nameless people and yet certain members here are willing to believe it and the amount of claims made here that 'someone read somewhere' are too numerous to mention. At least PH is saying that a certain person called him and that person now has a right to refute the claim if it's bogus. However, I fail to see how someone calling himself BC would call at a time when a meeting is in the pipeline - arranged through a friend. Bit of a coincidence.

It is but PH himself said he couldn't be certain the person who phoned him months later was definitely Brett, although he thought it was him but there is an element of doubt. 
I will believe police have come forward if there's proof otherwise I'll ignore it.