New video on the bike:

[lookout]

EP were continually using a sledgehammer to crack a nut,simply because they'd found nothing to go on as regards Jeremy having been the killer.
They tried the bike,the file,the windows, the phone-call,etc,etc and when all else failed,used the silencer,which to this day remains dodgy.

[Jan]

Do you think it is a coincidence it was brought over just before the massacre ? It was certainly a big one. And strange that Jeremy would expect his girlfriend and guest to start cycling to places. Very charming.

There is no proof the bike was used. But the prosecution alleged this to the jury. He could have also walked there.

No because Julie admitted that in the past she had asked Jeremy about the bike.

[Jan]

If the inside latch falls into place after being banged from outside, that is locked.

It may not be a very secure lock, like a bolt or key lock.  But an intruder would have to force entry.

If you want to call it closed, shut etc, feel free.

I will have to remember that if I have an insurance claim

"claim refused your windows were closed but not locked so the burglars got in "


But insurance company how can you refuse my claim ? CLOSED AND  LOCKED IS THE SAME THING!

[Adam]

No because Julie admitted that in the past she had asked Jeremy about the bike.

A year earlier she said she may have mentioned it.

Why would he bring the bike over just before the massacre for Julie, if the relationship was coming to a close ? (Judges question).

She also put in her WS that Bamber was planning to cycle to WHF.

[Jan]

Seems his campaign team are trying to work against all of the negative publicity that Bamber has received lately and of course the fact that two new books have been released highlighting Bambers guilt to the wider public.

But the campaigns illogical propaganda does more harm than good, to me anyway. If he is truly innocent- then why do the campaign team lie in their videos?

Mat - are they telling lies about the phone then?


Just to show I am still trying to look at things in detail and asking questions.

Or are you saying the words they are attributing to Ainsley  are not true - it is a very clear statement?

[Adam]

If Julie was trying to frame Bamber, why would she say that she 'may' have mentioned a bike may be useful to her a year earlier ?

[Jan]

If Julie was trying to frame Bamber, why would she say that she 'may' have mentioned a bike may be useful to her a year earlier ?

I never said she was trying to frame Jeremy - did I - Do you never read my posts?

[Adam]

I never said she was trying to frame Jeremy - did I - Do you never read my posts?

So you think she was telling the truth ?

[Jan]

So you think she was telling the truth ?

that proves 100% you just like the sound of your own voice .

And you are not even one tiny bit interested in anyones opinion except your own.

[Adam]

I never said she was trying to frame Jeremy - did I - Do you never read my posts?

I have reported you to the moderators again.

My post was not asking you or anyone else. However you accused me of 'not bothering to read you're posts'.

Of course I read them, which is why I have told you that you must change stance.

[Jan]

Adam -why don't you start a thread on the new video about the phones ?

Just to show you are open minded to discussion?

[Jan]

I have reported you to the moderators again.

My post was not asking you or anyone else. However you accused me of 'not bothering to read you're posts'.

Of course I read them, which is why I have told you that you must change stance.

No you have not otherwise you would not be asking questions about what I think of julies evidence - I explained my OPINION, because it is nothing more nothing less, very recently.

F

[Adam]

Adam -why don't you start a thread on the new video about the phones ?

Just to show you are open minded to discussion?

Why don't you start a thread.

I have only watched a bit of it.

It is interesting that there was just one phone line. Bamber taking the kitchen phone off the hook upon entry disabling all phones.

[Jan]

Why don't you start a thread.

I have only watched a bit of it.

It is interesting that there was just one phone line. Bamber taking the kitchen phone off the hook upon entry disabling all phones.

Hmm refusing to start a thread . Really ? Are you not feeling well today?

[Adam]

Unless BW,  the housekeeper or anyone else can say where the phones were on the day of the massacre, then no one will ever know.

The bedroom phone was either in the bedroom and disabled by Bamber upon entrance. Who then took it downstairs. Or it was already downstairs in the kitchen. 

Either way, it is a reason why Neville headed to the kitchen.