Same old same old.
No one saw Jeremy go to or from WHF and his car had not moved. Which can and has been explained away. Easily.
It then said there is no evidence linking Jeremy to the scene. This is wrong as there is a mountain of forensic and circumstantial evidence.
When did the police say Jeremy walked to WHF ? The video also says that is a 'fantastic' story. Don't see what is so fantastic about a 24 year old man walking 3 miles. Or less.
It says there was no evidence of a force entry. Which is wrong. There were scratch marks on the bathroom window. Anyway Jeremy said he knew how to get into WHF.
It says he used the bike only to return home. This is wrong as Julie's WS says she saw the bike at Goldhanger pre massacre.
Why would there be blood on the bike ? Was Jeremy bleeding ? I thought he showered at WHF.
The bike had been bought for Julie to use

It says the reconstruction of the bike ride was not done by someone of Jeremy's size and weight ? Was Jeremy 20 stone and hardly able to move then ?
It seems there were several cycle and walking routes to/from WHF. The longest route was 35 minutes. And ?
It says Jeremy detailed TV programmes he watched. However the police interviews show he made mistakes.
It says there is no evidence he videoed any TV programmes on the night. Perhaps he erased them, the criminal mastermind. Or didn't video anything.
It has a pop at the relatives. But the police didn't need the relatives. Julie had told them the bike had been brought over just before the massacre. RB & AE had seen the bike at Goldhanger as well. All eventually confirmed by Jeremy in his police interviews.