But why are you interested in a case which has been concluded in your mind? the only interest to you could be why a man who is guilty would continue to protest his innocence ? what other possible interest could there be ?
Oh and don't say thread created . Its boring
Oi!!! Don't you start this too.
Starting to sound like xxxxx and that isn't good!!
It's an interesting case to me because.
He still claims innocence because he has nowhere else to go. The courts and CCRC heavily reject his poor applications - yet people still support him. I really struggle to understand why.
I think it's easy to throw the "why do you care" statement at 'guilters' but I find it just as confusing why supporters care & what the heck it can be that means they will throw what amounts to not much more than blind faith behind Bamber because there is absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing. All that there is are a few discrepancies in police statements but the truth is that if you were to look at most cases the same would be true.
I think the counter question to yours would be - why is it that SOME supporters seem to support many other MOJ's too? It's not just Bamber they support but others - and why do some supporters seem to have previous trust issues with establishments and the police. I am not including you in this, Jan as I don't think you follow other 'MOJs' but some people that have trust issues and past issues with the police are more inclined to support MOJ's online it seems.
