New radio interviews

[Caroline]

so ph might not have a clue who this person or weather they are what they cliam to be.

Someone who sent the letter would have to know he was writing a book, they would have to know it as about Bamber, they would have to have access to his address and they would have to know about the case. People here write to Jeremy - they could always ask him about the scenario?

[nugnug]

well he anounced to everyone he was writing a book about Jeremy bamber the first one shouldent of been hard to work out.

and its not like its hard to find information on the case.

[Caroline]

well he anounced to everyone he was writing a book about Jeremy bamber the first one shouldent of been hard to work out.

and its not like its hard to find information on the case.

So just another one to add to the ever growing long list of liars? 

[Jane]

But the idea that Jeremy is innocent and he was framed by EP, the relatives, Julie Mugford, the Sun Newspaper, the lab, the prosecution team, Julie's friends, his friends, the establishment, Babs Wilson ..... (please feel free to add to the list) makes perfect sense 

Don't forget the writer of the anonymous letter!!! To summerize, what I learned yesterday was that not only does Nugs believe all the above to be true but also that there are certain "experts" who concur -however we're not told who are these experts.

 It was with some interest that I learned from Nugs that prisoners don't talk to each other but what interested me more was Lookout's emphatic assertion that prisoners don't have friends in other prisoners!!!!!!!!!!! Might this be to put a pure. spotless and monk-like and unblemished Jeremy aside from prison riff raff? I CANNOT imagine what life would be like OUT of any confined space, without friends -nor do I care to- but I imagine that 30yrs behind bars and friendless would be intolerable, MORE so if one had needed to be surrounded by people on the outside, OR have an audience, which it seems Jeremy did.

[Jane]

well he anounced to everyone he was writing a book about Jeremy bamber the first one shouldent of been hard to work out.

and its not like its hard to find information on the case.

Nugs, I'm beginning to wonder if you keep adding to the list of those you consider to be involved in, what is fast becoming the greatest conspiracy of all time, bar none as a way of keeping it alive. Feel free to keep on adding. The more that get added to the list, the more improbable it becomes because the same question can be applied to the cast of thousands as could be applied to a few. The question is WHY

[Neil]

I agree but I think her role (if she had one) would have been passive, but having her onside means one less person to control.

If ifs & ands were pots and pans they'd be no need for tinkers' hands.

[Jane]

Prisoners do talk to each other about past crimes or whatever they have been up to before going to jail.  It's about survival in prison people live on their wits, how many times have you heard about cell mates confessing to other cell mates and then police getting involved, at one time they  used to put prisoners in cells with other prisoners hoping to get confessions?  I would not be surprised if this is not still carried on?      Reasons prisoners confess They might figure that since they're both criminals, the guy won't snitch on him, or that even if he does, his testimony will be regarded as unreliable. Sometimes people feel like they want to tell their stories to someone, and in that situation there's no one else to confide in besides other prisoners. Also, sometimes people get to know their celly pretty well, and they may think that the guy is trustworthy. Also, if the celly does snitch, he'll be in violation of the anti-snitching convict code.

Confessors might not realize that there are plenty of people in jails and prisons who are yearning for any opportunity to get some information they can trade to the government for a lighter sentence, and the government is often happy to make that kind of deal, and to protect the snitches from retaliation. They also might not realize that some cellies will have an attitude of, "I'm going to go to prison for my crime, so you should too." If their celly treats them cordially, they might overestimate the strength of the bond of friendship between them.

Brilliant post, Justice. 

[susan]

I agree that there might have been some passive involvement from Sheila - but I think Jeremy did the shooting.

Caroline
I agree with you I think Jeremy did the shooting he would originally have roped Sheila in so as she could let him in and keep her quiet her thinking they had a suicide pact or the like I have always thought Sheila was brainwashed by him but did not shoot anyone this explains why she was so clean and he had a need to say he had taken her soiled clothes home to destroy it sounds like the story he told his cell mate was told to fit the crime scene and it is strange no mention of the twins.  I suppose with such a complex person has JB it is difficult to figure his action out.

[Caroline]

If ifs & ands were pots and pans they'd be no need for tinkers' hands.

If ifs and buts were fruits and nuts them we'd all have a Merry Christmas -The forum is made up of them - usually a discussion is!

[lookout]

If ifs and buts were fruits and nuts them we'd all have a Merry Christmas -The forum is made up of them - usually a discussion is!

Speak for yourself.

[maggie]

If ifs and buts were fruits and nuts them we'd all have a Merry Christmas -The forum is made up of them - usually a discussion is!

Never heard that before  I like it 

[Caroline]

Speak for yourself.

I do speak for myself 

[Caroline]

Never heard that before  I like it 

 

[guest154]

If ifs and buts were fruits and nuts them we'd all have a Merry Christmas -The forum is made up of them - usually a discussion is!

Forum is made up of ifs and buts? Or fruits and nuts?   

[Caroline]

Forum is made up of ifs and buts? Or fruits and nuts?   

Possibly more the latter?