New radio interviews

[nugnug]

Same here Maggie, always had the feeling that this might be the case. Always felt Jeremy on his own no, Sheila on her own no, together yes?  Just don't feel they were both cut out on their own to do it, Jeremy being the instigator.

what would be the motive for both of them doing it.

[susan]

They were both in the house so it's possible but if the letter is genuine, what is more important to me, is that Jeremy was willing to discuss his involvement and innocent people wouldn't do that.

Caroline
well said that is so true an innocent man would not discuss his involvement.

[Caroline]

what would be the motive for both of them doing it.

Freedom!

[guest7363]

what would be the motive for both of them doing it.

Jeremy's motive is obvious, he wants the lot?  Sometimes one doesn't need a motive one can easily be manipulated into committing crime esp when one's mind is unbalanced, Sheila might not have realised it was going to go as far as it did or just got carried away in what was happening who knows Nugs we will never know I am afraid?

[guest7363]

They were both in the house so it's possible but if the letter is genuine, what is more important to me, is that Jeremy was willing to discuss his involvement and innocent people wouldn't do that.

Very well said Caroline.

[nugnug]

Jeremy's motive is obvious, he wants the lot?  Sometimes one doesn't need a motive one can easily be manipulated into committing crime esp when one's mind is unbalanced, Sheila might not have realised it was going to go as far as it did or just got carried away in what was happening who knows Nugs we will never know I am afraid?

how likely is it that he would want sheila as an acomplice she couldent be relyid upon.

[maggie]

Caroline
well said that is so true an innocent man would not discuss his involvement.

It was interesting, if it's true that he said in the letter that JB said he left through the window and locked it behind him.

[scipio_usmc]

how likely is it that he would want sheila as an acomplice she couldent be relyid upon.

Not only could that backfire by her telling people in advance but worse would he really trust her with a gun and expect her to only shoot everyone else and not him as well?

[guest7363]

how likely is it that he would want sheila as an acomplice she couldent be relyid upon.

What makes you think she was not reliable? You think she did it alone doesn't that make her reliable? What if he pulled her in on the final day when they chatted in the field, he could have been training her mind up to this point? Again I am no expert I have always had a feeling that their were two and it could have been Sheila?  Now you can throw lots of questions to me and I or anyone on  here cannot be 100 per cent certain and that is what makes this case so interesting. On the plus side Nugs I have talked to a pyschiatrist who worked at full Sutton and believe me they do talk?  Their was another person who worked at full Sutton and I will not name the role they did and funnily enough they both said the same things as one another told me?  But again this is only my hearsay

[Caroline]

What makes you think she was not reliable? You think she did it alone doesn't that make her reliable? What if he pulled her in on the final day when they chatted in the field, he could have been training her mind up to this point? Again I am no expert I have always had a feeling that their were two and it could have been Sheila?  Now you can throw lots of questions to me and I or anyone on  here cannot be 100 per cent certain and that is what makes this case so interesting.

I agree but I think her role (if she had one) would have been passive, but having her onside means one less person to control.

[nugnug]

What makes you think she was not reliable? You think she did it alone doesn't that make her reliable? What if he pulled her in on the final day when they chatted in the field, he could have been training her mind up to this point? Again I am no expert I have always had a feeling that their were two and it could have been Sheila?  Now you can throw lots of questions to me and I or anyone on  here cannot be 100 per cent certain and that is what makes this case so interesting. On the plus side Nugs I have talked to a pyschiatrist who worked at full Sutton and believe me they do talk?  Their was another person who worked at full Sutton and I will not name the role they did and funnily enough they both said the same things as one another told me?  But again this is only my hearsay

how could her to go along with it not change her mind and not tell anybody.

what are the chances of them both wanting to kill there parents unless theres somthing about there parents we dont know about its higly unlikely.

[guest7363]

I agree but I think her role (if she had one) would have been passive, but having her onside means one less person to control.

Could not agree more Caroline, also it would give him a feeling of less guilt?  He could blame Sheila and this would help him later on in life to deal with it in his mind?

[Caroline]

how could her to go along with it not change her mind and not tell anybody.

what are the chances of them both wanting to kill there parents unless theres somthing about there parents we dont know about its higly unlikely.

There is lots about all of them that we don't know about.

[maggie]

I agree but I think her role (if she had one) would have been passive, but having her onside means one less person to control.

It does answer the question of what she was doing while Jeremy was killing everyone.

[Caroline]

Could not agree more Caroline, also it would give him a feeling of less guilt?  He could blame Sheila and this would help him later on in life to deal with it in his mind?

That too - although I don't think Jeremy has any guilt. If he did tell an imate this story, he seem to be playing games.