Author Topic: New radio interviews  (Read 20470 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #90 on: July 23, 2015, 09:33:PM »
What experts?

I guess he means Sutherst... although I think his 'findings' left a lot to be desired. Same with the recent Arizona tests.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #91 on: July 23, 2015, 09:44:PM »
I guess he means Sutherst... although I think his 'findings' left a lot to be desired. Same with the recent Arizona tests.

But Suthest admitted his findings weren't conclusive or scientific. I haven't see any experts that have suggested the entire enquiry all lies and only Jeremy was telling the truth but if Nugs knows of one??  :-\
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #92 on: July 23, 2015, 09:45:PM »
well i think if they had recived such anoumous letter they might of mentioned it but appwerantly who ever gets sent these letters.

Why would they mention it?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #93 on: July 23, 2015, 09:48:PM »
what another prisoner telling them of a confession of course they would mention it.

im sure they would mention anoumous death threats if they really got them as well.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2015, 09:49:PM by nugnug »

guest154

  • Guest
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #94 on: July 23, 2015, 09:51:PM »
But Suthest admitted his findings weren't conclusive or scientific. I haven't see any experts that have suggested the entire enquiry all lies and only Jeremy was telling the truth but if Nugs knows of one??  :-\

There aren't any. I know that, you know that.  ;D

Unless I've missed something. Nuggs, which expert/s did you mean?

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #95 on: July 23, 2015, 09:52:PM »
Maggie what parts of the letter did you find plausible.?
The fact they may have both done it. As I said I don't know why but I do find that more plausible than some other theories.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #96 on: July 23, 2015, 09:54:PM »
what another prisoner telling them of a confession of course they would mention it.

im sure they would mention anoumous death threats if they really got them as well.

The explanation of the letter explains why the prisoner wrote to PH. It comes down to who you want to believe but I find it odd that you believe everyone (and his dog) lied to frame and innocent JB but you can't believe that prisoners talk to each other. Odd!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #97 on: July 23, 2015, 09:54:PM »
There aren't any. I know that, you know that;D

Unless I've missed something. Nuggs, which expert/s did you mean?

Really?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;) 8)
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #98 on: July 23, 2015, 09:55:PM »
Prisoners do talk to each other about past crimes or whatever they have been up to before going to jail.  It's about survival in prison people live on their wits, how many times have you heard about cell mates confessing to other cell mates and then police getting involved, at one time they  used to put prisoners in cells with other prisoners hoping to get confessions?  I would not be surprised if this is not still carried on?      Reasons prisoners confess They might figure that since they're both criminals, the guy won't snitch on him, or that even if he does, his testimony will be regarded as unreliable. Sometimes people feel like they want to tell their stories to someone, and in that situation there's no one else to confide in besides other prisoners. Also, sometimes people get to know their celly pretty well, and they may think that the guy is trustworthy. Also, if the celly does snitch, he'll be in violation of the anti-snitching convict code.

Confessors might not realize that there are plenty of people in jails and prisons who are yearning for any opportunity to get some information they can trade to the government for a lighter sentence, and the government is often happy to make that kind of deal, and to protect the snitches from retaliation. They also might not realize that some cellies will have an attitude of, "I'm going to go to prison for my crime, so you should too." If their celly treats them cordially, they might overestimate the strength of the bond of friendship between them.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #99 on: July 23, 2015, 09:55:PM »
The fact they may have both done it. As I said I don't know why but I do find that more plausible than some other theories.

I agree that there might have been some passive involvement from Sheila - but I think Jeremy did the shooting.
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #100 on: July 23, 2015, 09:56:PM »
The fact they may have both done it. As I said I don't know why but I do find that more plausible than some other theories.

I agree that there might have been some passive involvement from Sheila - but I think Jeremy did the shooting.


I find the idea of both of them being involved, the worst theory I have heard.  ;D And I've heard a few. It just seems madness to me.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #101 on: July 23, 2015, 10:00:PM »

I find the idea of both of them being involved, the worst theory I have heard.  ;D And I've heard a few. It just seems madness to me.

They were both in the house so it's possible but if the letter is genuine, what is more important to me, is that Jeremy was willing to discuss his involvement and innocent people wouldn't do that.
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #102 on: July 23, 2015, 10:00:PM »
The fact they may have both done it. As I said I don't know why but I do find that more plausible than some other theories.
Same here Maggie, always had the feeling that this might be the case. Always felt Jeremy on his own no, Sheila on her own no, together yes?  Just don't feel they were both cut out on their own to do it, Jeremy being the instigator.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #103 on: July 23, 2015, 10:04:PM »
They were both in the house so it's possible but if the letter is genuine, what is more important to me, is that Jeremy was willing to discuss his involvement and innocent people wouldn't do that.

Couldn't agree more.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #104 on: July 23, 2015, 10:08:PM »
Prisoners do talk to each other about past crimes or whatever they have been up to before going to jail.  It's about survival in prison people live on their wits, how many times have you heard about cell mates confessing to other cell mates and then police getting involved, at one time they  used to put prisoners in cells with other prisoners hoping to get confessions?  I would not be surprised if this is not still carried on?      Reasons prisoners confess They might figure that since they're both criminals, the guy won't snitch on him, or that even if he does, his testimony will be regarded as unreliable. Sometimes people feel like they want to tell their stories to someone, and in that situation there's no one else to confide in besides other prisoners. Also, sometimes people get to know their celly pretty well, and they may think that the guy is trustworthy. Also, if the celly does snitch, he'll be in violation of the anti-snitching convict code.

Confessors might not realize that there are plenty of people in jails and prisons who are yearning for any opportunity to get some information they can trade to the government for a lighter sentence, and the government is often happy to make that kind of deal, and to protect the snitches from retaliation. They also might not realize that some cellies will have an attitude of, "I'm going to go to prison for my crime, so you should too." If their celly treats them cordially, they might overestimate the strength of the bond of friendship between them.

Excellent post Justice.
Few people have the imagination for reality