Lets all be honest there are a LOT of contradictions in this case and somehow Scipio Always knows the one which is right. 
He excuses every contradiction as a "mistake" that suits his scenario.
He also keeps repeating things as if they are fact that have not been proved. Assumptions are not facts.
Most contradictions are in the claims of Jeremy supporters. Anytime I challenge you and other supporters to come up with questionable things you end up coming up with nothing beyond the fact the police initially missed the moderator. That means nothing and the rest of what is raised is nonsense.
The police initially failed to properly consider the possibility they were all murdered and as a result failed to do some things they should have that would have caught Jeremy sooner. They failed to take the firearms and all firearms related materials from the outset. They left evidence behind like bloody bedding then destroyed it for Jeremy to try to help him so he would not have to clean such up. They failed to ask for his clothing and to make a record of injuries to his body or to ask him to willingly provide any swabs to test for GSR. They did not question Jeremy about the contradictory claims he made to police. He told different police different things.
These things were all to Jeremy's benefit so it is illogical to point them out and try to suggest these are things which hurt him.
Jeremy supporters dishonestly try to pretend their initial lack of suspicion and miserable failures at reading the scene properly means Jeremy was innocent and they framed him when they later changed their minds and built a case against him.
After his conviction a lot of nonsense has been made up including bogus claims that police moved things before taking photos which still would not have any implications even if true but are not true. All these dishonest supporters do is take photos taken after things were moved and lie claiming they were taken before the bodies were moved. The same lie can be used in any case. At some point the bodies have to be moved and photos taken again after they are.
All cases have typographical errors on documents and plenty have changes made to exhibit numbers etc.
These are all insignificant but have been jumped on after the conviction to try creating a general sense of suspicion. Since there is no actual specific evidence of wrongdoing supporters rely on a web of suspicion they conjure up and that is supposed to make up for the lack of any actual evidence of evidence being doctored. It doesn't.
When I challenge supporters to actually back up their claims such as the claim you just made I always am left hearing crickets.
